<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research Rap: Are Engineers Social? Online They Are!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/research-rap-are-engineers-social-online-they-are/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/research-rap-are-engineers-social-online-they-are/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=research-rap-are-engineers-social-online-they-are</link>
	<description>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Woodhouse</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/research-rap-are-engineers-social-online-they-are/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Woodhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=251#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Jim,

From what I&#039;ve seen, in the high tech industry segment, engineers have been using the network for social and business interaction for longer than almost any other community (look at usenet). Historically though, there has been a firm border between these systems and the &quot;official&quot; product development/PLM toolsets. Typically, the use of these networking tools for product development has been discouraged because of security and IP protection concerns (open source software being the exception).

What is interesting is that the border between enterprise tools and networking tools is now fuzzy, and getting fuzzier, yet companies are more concerned than ever with protecting their IP. So what you get is &quot;underground&quot; collaboration. I haven&#039;t seen a solution yet that attempts to address these conflicting trends without requiring a lot of administrative overhead.

Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen, in the high tech industry segment, engineers have been using the network for social and business interaction for longer than almost any other community (look at usenet). Historically though, there has been a firm border between these systems and the &#8220;official&#8221; product development/PLM toolsets. Typically, the use of these networking tools for product development has been discouraged because of security and IP protection concerns (open source software being the exception).</p>
<p>What is interesting is that the border between enterprise tools and networking tools is now fuzzy, and getting fuzzier, yet companies are more concerned than ever with protecting their IP. So what you get is &#8220;underground&#8221; collaboration. I haven&#8217;t seen a solution yet that attempts to address these conflicting trends without requiring a lot of administrative overhead.</p>
<p>Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos Voskuil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/research-rap-are-engineers-social-online-they-are/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos Voskuil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=251#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Jim hi, I fully agree with your observations. I believe due to the time engineers and developers spent behind the computer it becomes a &#039;friendly&#039;environment, easy to expand their activities as they feel comfortable with somehow complex interfaces. For that reason new Web 2.0 technologies / concepts are interesting for them. A data consumer (sorry for the word) who uses the computer like a browser to search for data, usually does not jump into the complexity to be interactive. 

Although i believe the new generation, like my kids, are much more trained and familiar with social networking. They have hundreds of friends ..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim hi, I fully agree with your observations. I believe due to the time engineers and developers spent behind the computer it becomes a &#8216;friendly&#8217;environment, easy to expand their activities as they feel comfortable with somehow complex interfaces. For that reason new Web 2.0 technologies / concepts are interesting for them. A data consumer (sorry for the word) who uses the computer like a browser to search for data, usually does not jump into the complexity to be interactive. </p>
<p>Although i believe the new generation, like my kids, are much more trained and familiar with social networking. They have hundreds of friends &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrek cooper</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/research-rap-are-engineers-social-online-they-are/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>derrek cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=251#comment-83</guid>
		<description>The adoption of social product dev will be interesting for sure. The biggest unknown is how it will be accepted by the masses and how to ensure that the social side of it is directed towards work during work and not work during non-work.

The more actual examples in working environments, the more you will see mgmt accept the idea of it.. &quot;proof is in the pudding&quot;

Otherwise, we will see some will have a jaded view of social networks because of what they see and hear at home with their kids.

There will be a fine line of &quot;professional&quot; level social networks and &quot;personal&quot; networks. There will certainly be overlap with contacts and tools, but the content should be quite different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The adoption of social product dev will be interesting for sure. The biggest unknown is how it will be accepted by the masses and how to ensure that the social side of it is directed towards work during work and not work during non-work.</p>
<p>The more actual examples in working environments, the more you will see mgmt accept the idea of it.. &#8220;proof is in the pudding&#8221;</p>
<p>Otherwise, we will see some will have a jaded view of social networks because of what they see and hear at home with their kids.</p>
<p>There will be a fine line of &#8220;professional&#8221; level social networks and &#8220;personal&#8221; networks. There will certainly be overlap with contacts and tools, but the content should be quite different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

