<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Software and PLM &#8211; Gap Filler or Intelligent Network?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=social-software-plm-intelligent-network</link>
	<description>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/comment-page-3/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=824#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks very much for the links to my blog post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. &lt;br&gt;In order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#039;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>Thanks very much for the links to my blog post.</p>
<p>This is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. <br />In order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).</p>
<p>In my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.</p>
<p>I guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.</p>
<p>I have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#39;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=824#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#039;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#8217;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/comment-page-1/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=824#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#039;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#8217;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=824#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#039;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#8217;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=824#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#039;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#8217;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/social-software-plm-intelligent-network/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=824#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#039;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,nnThanks very much for the links to my blog post.nnThis is a great question that Andrew McAfee already has articulated. nIn order to facilitate Enterprise Social Networks (ESN or ESSP), he recommends to put these tools into the work processes(what he calls in the flow) instead of above the flow (i.e independently or on top of standard work processes).nnIn my article, I consider ESN as great facilitator for casual yet efficient knowledge management. This is the main usage I recommend for integration hance using it above the flow.nnI guess that considering the complexity of PLM, it is very challenging to identify the functional integration points where  ESN can be integrated in the flow to bring more added value. This is the approach you recommend which is in my view more valuable but more difficult.nnI have been thinking lately about this and hopefully I&#8217;ll come back with a blog post that will address this issue and be more aligned with your approach, which is great by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

