Clarity on PLM

Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing
Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’

Webcasts: Learn what Social Business Collaboration and Advanced Product Portfolio Management Have in Common

February 08, 2012 By: Jim Brown Category: Uncategorized

A quick peek into some research on Social Business Collaboration and Advanced PPM. What do these two very  interesting topics have in common? Live webcasts featuring Jim Brown of Tech-Clarity next week, Thursday and Friday February 16-17.

OK, I admit it was a cheap trick, but I hope it convinces you to learn about one (or both) of these exciting topics:

Nuage Social Business Collaboration Launch
Jim Brown will present views from his recent report on social business collaboration and the product lifecycle as a guest host of the launch of software company Nuage Corporation. Nuage is a very interesting new company with a very different view on how social computing can drive innovation and help product development teams work together and collaborate effectively, with or without a PLM system.
Register for the Webinar

Taking PPM to the Next Level
Jim Brown presents his views on Advanced PPM on this joint SAP / SmartOrg webinar. He will share his views from his report on improving product development decision making. This is a repeat performance of a popular subject, and will also explain how Advanced PPM can fit in as a workbench to extend SAP PLM.
Register for the Webinar

So I hope you can join us for these educational events, they should be exciting. Please take a look to find out about more Tech-Clarity speaking engagements.

Share

Social Innovation Crystal Ball Predictions for 2012

January 31, 2012 By: Jim Brown Category: Uncategorized

A quick peek into some research on the use of social computing for product innovation and product development and some insight into what to expect in 2012. I teamed up with innovation consulting firm Kalypso last year to survey companies using (or planning to use) social media or other “web 2.0″ techniques to improve innovation. The research followed a similar survey in 2010, allowing us to get some insight into trends and future direction. Kalypso’s Amy Kenly and I teamed up to share the results and I thought I would share a bit with you here.

The Research (and my crystal ball disclaimer)

For those of you that know me, you know my regular disclaimer that I don’t really own a crystal ball (or even a magic eight ball), so I rely on survey-based research to get a view of what companies are doing and plan to do in the near future. Kalypso’s second annual “SPIKE” survey provided an opportunity to see what companies planned to, but also to see how much they accomplished of the plans they put in place in 2010. I will hit on a couple of the highlights here, but feel free to read the full Predictions for Social Product Innovation in 2012 post on the Kalypso website.

Key Research Findings

One of the main findings from the research was that in 2011 companies managed to gain benefits despite a lack of strategic plans. In 2010 we found that many companies were acting without a plan. In 2011, we saw that many were able to achieve some valuable results including more (and perhaps more importantly) better product ideas. In addition, they were able to use social computing to strengthen relationships internally and externally.

Source: Kalypso LLC

 A related finding is that quite a few companies took a step back from social computing in 2011. While the total percentage of companies (about half of companies in both 2010 and 2011, see chart in the Kalypso post) either have a plan or are developing a plan for social product innovation – there was a distinct shift from those that said they have a plan towards those that are in planning mode. We interpret this as a direct result of the fact we reported last year – that companies were acting without a plan – and that this is a healthy sign that they are taking a step back to strategize (hopefully taking into account the learnings of their early efforts).

Implications for Manufacturers

Social product innovation is still new and companies are still learning. There have been some false starts and some companies have needed to take a step back to put a plan in place. On the other hand, the benefits manufacturers are achieving from social product innovation are impressive and strategic. Not surprisingly, companies plan to do more in 2012 (see below). It should be an interesting year.

Source: Kalypso LLC

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on the use of social computing for NPD and innovation, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? How about my post on 2011 – The Year Social Computing Explodes in NPD and PLM, was my “crystal ball” clear on that one? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective. And please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

Share

Better Service Performance requires Better Product and Service Information

January 24, 2012 By: Jim Brown Category: Uncategorized

A quick peek into some research on enabling service organizations with the right product information from Tech-Clarity Insight: Better Service from Better Product Information: Evolving to Visual, Product-Centric Service Communication. Service has become a higher strategy priority for manufacturers focused on keeping customers satisfied and taking advantage of higher profit margins in the service lifecycle. Providing technicians and customers with the right product and service information, particularly in a visual formats including 3D and animations, has become more important – and more attainable – over the last few years. The report highlights interviews with General Atomics, Nikon, and Whirlpool to understand the issue and how manufacturers take advantage of PLM tools to enable better service.

Backdrop: Strategic Importance of Service on the Rise

Ten years ago service was an afterthought for most manufacturers. In fact, most companies would call it a necessary evil. But even in the early 2000′s, The Service Lifecycle Management Approach: Strong Customer Relationships Result in Profit in the Service Industry indicated a shift toward a more strategic view. As one of the participants in that research explained, manufacturers were starting to realize that “Customer satisfaction is extremely important to building long term relationships. It is also good business, because it leads to greater profitability through customer retention and repeat business.” In other words, good service is just good business.

Service may be good business, but it is also a big challenge. This is even more true in today’s global marketplace where service techs may be located anywhere in the world and speak any number of languages. Product complexity has also risen, as explained by Nikon in the report and evidenced by Tech-Clarity’s The Five Dimensions of Product Complexity. Products are now more complex due to new materials, miniaturization, smarter product capabilities, and other trends. Without the right information at hand – or perhaps worse having the bad information – service techs are likely to waste time, incur higher service cost, and end up disappointing customers with machine downtime. See the report for more, but for now let’s talk about how to address the challenges and achieve better service.

The Research Findings

Customers want their equipment serviced quickly and accurately. To do this in a complex service environment, techs need to be enabled with the right product information and service instructions. They need to be able to access and use that information quickly, and it should be the most up to date information possible. As Debra West-Maciaszek for Nikon explains in the report, “Looking for information doesn’t help the field service engineer, and the customer is in their face saying ‘fix my machine’.” The report highlights a number of key factors that can help manufactures develop better, more timely service information at lower cost:

  • Use visual illustrations to improve communication and cut through language barriers
  • Leverage existing assets (including CAD) to develop illustrations faster and more accurately
  • Move to 3D to provide a more realist representation of products
  • Incorporate animation to demonstrate service procedures clearly
  • Provide rich product data behind the graphics to give service techs the details they need to do their jobs
  • Take a product-centric approach to service information and illustrations, including specific documentation for different configurations
  • Manage service documentation and illustration change holistically with product change

One of the key points is that visual communications offers tremendous advantages. First and foremost, it just fits the world we live in. I like to ask people to try to write text instructions for tying a shoe. It takes a lot of steps, and is very difficult to comprehend without pictures (do I hear some of you reciting “the bunny goes into the bunny hole” as you think about it? Even in native language text-based instructions miss the mark, and with variable language and reading skills in the global workforce the problem only gets worse. Graphical communication for products is the way to go. This is valuable for service and beyond, see Showing Off Your Products – 3D Technical Product Communications for more.

Another aspect of the findings is that there is a great opportunity to leverage PLM for service information. PLM has the right product-centric approach and houses the CAD and product specification assets that companies need to develop effective service communication. It also offers the opportunity to include service information as part of the product lifecycle, incorporating graphics and instructions into the umbrella of change management and allowing information to be tailored to specific product configurations. As the report concludes, “It is a natural extension for PLM to manage product-centric service information in the service lifecycle such as illustrations and documentation.”

Implications for Manufacturers

So what can manufacturers do with the information in this report? First, they can review (or develop) their service information strategy to ensure that it is providing the most up to date, graphical, tailored service information it can. Evaluate what technicians need to get their jobs done, and look for ways to leverage existing CAD and PLM assets to deliver it. The service lifecycle is getting a lot of attention in corporate strategies, and PLM solutions are now extending their capabilities further into the lifecycle. The time has come to see how PLM can improve service performance and profitability.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on providing service technicians and customers with better product and service information, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective. Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

Share

Mechatronics: Driving Product Innovation with Embedded Software

August 16, 2011 By: Jim Brown Category: Uncategorized

A quick peek into some research on … designing mechatronic products. The research, Tech-Clarity’s Issue in Focus: Systems and Software Driven Innovation: Complexity and Opportunity in the Mechatronic Era covers both sides of the software driven products coin – the complexity it places on engineering and product development teams and the opportunity it offers to drive more innovative products.

The Research Findings

The report first describes the trend toward more software in products. An increasing amount of product functionality is now driven by software algorithms rather than mechanics, even for mechanically-intensive products like transmissions and suspensions. In fact, many traditional manufacturers now have a lot more software engineers working on product development than they do in their IT departments, and more software engineers than mechanical engineers. Clearly, times are changing.

The report covers two aspects of mechatronics – complexity and opportunity:

  • Complexity: As discussed in the Five Dimensions of Product Complexity with PLM, designing products that cross engineering disciplines adds complexity. For example, changes to mechanical designs might require changes in the control software. In fact, managing requirements, configurations, and change across disciplines are some of the more significant challenges companies face.
  • Opportunity: The report also describes how software driven capabilities allow manufacturers to tailor products to customer or market needs, increase reuse, change products in the field, reduce product cost, and lower product development cost.

Implications for Manufacturers
The trend toward more software driven capabilities will likely continue and perhaps accelerate. The benefits are just too compelling, and traditional products will continue to have a hard time competing against “smarter” products. Mechatronics is here to stay, so Engineering and product development teams have to learn systems engineering approaches and how to manage the complexity of multi-discipline design. But while fighting the complexity, manufacturers shouldn’t lose sight of the potential benefits ranging from more innovative and flexible products to cost savings.

The key to success is integrating designs and product development processes into a systems view. I believe that systems engineering approaches hold the answer, and that PLM solutions will evolve to manage the full systems engineering process. PTC clearly believes this based on their acquisition of MKS as announced at PlanetPTC. Other PLM vendors are also actively at work trying to solve this problem (and create new opportunities for themselves and their customers).

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on innovating with software driven products, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Are you including more software functionality in your products? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective.

Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

Share

Managing the Five Dimensions of Product Complexity with PLM

July 21, 2010 By: Jim Brown Category: Uncategorized

A quick peek into some research on … managing complexity across the product lifecycle from the Tech-Clarity research report The Five Dimensions of Product Complexity. The report highlights the trend toward increased product complexity over the past ten years, and how it has made developing profitable products more difficult. The report details the five dimensions, and then discusses how Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) software helps manage the complexity on an enterprise scale, helping manufacturers achieve greater efficiency and better products.

The Research Findings

The report points out three main aspects of the complexity problem. The first is obvious from the title, products have become more complex. Smarter product, miniaturization, and other advancements in engineering and product design have allowed companies to make more complex – and more capable – products. The second is the greater complexity of the supply and design chains that has resulted from globalization. The last part of the problem isn’t about complexity, it is the fact that as complexity has made engineers’ and product developers’ jobs more difficult – expectations for rapid development of high-quality, innovative products has increased. It is a perfect storm for engineers. The job is hard, but they must deliver better results.

The report discusses five different types of complexity, highlighting interviews with Honeywell and Mercury Marine:

  • Mechanical Complexity
  • Mechatronics
  • Global Markets
  • Global Design and Manufacturing
  • Lifecycle Profitability

Implications for Manufacturers

Increased product complexity probably comes as no surprise to product developers and engineers that are dealing with the complexity every day. The report goes beyond identifying the problem, and provides insight into how PLM software can help manufacturers deal with the perfect storm of increased complexity and higher expectations. As Rick Kennedy, Senior Technical Manager of Electrical Systems Engineering for Honeywell explains, “PLM offers really big gains in managing design complexity from systems design all the way through the product lifecycle.” Please see the report for more discussion from Rick as well as great insight from Fred Bellio of Mercury Marine.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on the use of PLM to manage product complexity, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective. Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

Share

Hello world!

April 28, 2009 By: Jim Brown Category: Uncategorized

Welcome to the new Tech-Clarity blog, Clarity on PLM. This blog will be Tech-Clarity’s primary outlet for our research and commentary on the value of enterprise software to improve product innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing.

We look forward to sharing this forum with you, and to your active participation in an ongoing dialogue about how software technology can improve business performance.

Share

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline