<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clarity on PLM &#187; Dassault Systemes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/tag/dassault-systemes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm</link>
	<description>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Did PLM Give Up on Product Cost Management?</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-product-cost-management/</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-product-cost-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adidas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akoya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aPriori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design for Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Cost Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens PLM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Product cost is not getting the attention it deserves in PLM. I was presenting on the future of PLM and a participant asked "why I hadn't included cost in the future of PLM?"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-product-cost-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Search of a Standard PLM Definition</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invention Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porduct Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage-Gate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I learned this week was that we could use a good, common PLM definition and scope, but we will not get one. The discussion (a lot of discussion in multiple forums, actually) came from my post SAP, Too Much or Too Little Credit for PLM Efforts and another called Who Will Disrupt Entrenched PLM Vendors? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>294</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Will Disrupt Entrenched PLM Vendors?</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/who-will-disrupt-entrenched-plm-vendors/</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/who-will-disrupt-entrenched-plm-vendors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arena Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I learned this week ... came from some discussions with Chris Williams yesterday about my blog post SAP - Too Much, or Too Little Credit for PLM? in combination with a conversation over breakfast with Oleg, author of PLMTwine. In both conversations I kept hearing about who is going to disrupt the big PLM vendors (Dassault Systemes, PTC, Siemens PLM).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/who-will-disrupt-entrenched-plm-vendors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mythbusting ERP-PLM Integration</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/mythbusting-erp-plm-integration/</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/mythbusting-erp-plm-integration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mythbusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Composite Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENOVIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teamcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windchill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick peek into some feedback on my research on ... the Evolving Roles of ERP and PLM in the manufacturing industry]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/mythbusting-erp-plm-integration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dassault Systemes and IBM put right the PLM Ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/dassault-systemes-ibm-plm-acquisition-ecosystem/</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/dassault-systemes-ibm-plm-acquisition-ecosystem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[One-to-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the chance to talk with ... Dassault Systemes and IBM today about Dassault's announced acquisition of parts of IBM's PLM business. For many, this is the dissolution of a long-standing marriage that they are comfortable with and makes sense. They may mourn the loss. To me, this is just the final correction to a legacy relationship that has served its time and purpose. Dassault Systemes (DS) and IBM have been great partners - and still will be. But this move will allow IBM and DS to focus on their core competencies and allow DS to continue pursuing their PLM vision.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/dassault-systemes-ibm-plm-acquisition-ecosystem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Vision for PLM and Beyond &#8211; Dassault Systemes</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/vision-plm-dassault-systemes/</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/vision-plm-dassault-systemes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[One-to-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the chance to talk with ... Dassault Systemes CEO Bernard Charles and his team at Dassault's 2009 customer conference today. I attended the general sessions in the morning and then spent some time speaking with DS execs in a smaller group setting. Once again, Bernard and the team painted a very different picture of PLM than some might have in mind. Dassault does PLM, but the vision does not stop there. It doesn't matter if you call it PLM 2.0 (as Dassault does) or put some other label on it - DS has a very unique view on what the future will look like. And they have plans to play a broader role than CAD, CAE or product design.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/vision-plm-dassault-systemes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
