<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Clarity on PLM &#187; Invention Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/tag/invention-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm</link>
	<description>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Clarity on PLM</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>In Search of a Standard PLM Definition</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=standard-plm-definition</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invention Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porduct Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage-Gate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I learned this week was that we could use a good, common PLM definition and scope, but we will not get one. The discussion (a lot of discussion in multiple forums, actually) came from my post SAP, Too Much or Too Little Credit for PLM Efforts and another called Who Will Disrupt Entrenched PLM Vendors? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>492</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invention Machine Boosts &#8220;Every Day&#8221; Innovation Capabilities</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/invention-machine-innovation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=invention-machine-innovation</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/invention-machine-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[One-to-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invention Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the chance to talk with ... Jim Todhunter and the team at Invention Machine about the new product release they announced today. There are lot of things that I like in the release designed to help further Invention Machine's ability to operationalize innovation. But what really struck me was the goal of this release to improve "Every Day Innovation" in a procedural, sustainable way.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/invention-machine-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

