<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Clarity on PLM &#187; Processes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/tag/processes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm</link>
	<description>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Clarity on PLM</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>In Search of a Standard PLM Definition</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=standard-plm-definition</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault Systemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invention Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porduct Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Lifecycle Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage-Gate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I learned this week was that we could use a good, common PLM definition and scope, but we will not get one. The discussion (a lot of discussion in multiple forums, actually) came from my post SAP, Too Much or Too Little Credit for PLM Efforts and another called Who Will Disrupt Entrenched PLM Vendors? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/standard-plm-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>492</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Implementing PLM Hard?</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/implementing-plm-hard/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=implementing-plm-hard</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/implementing-plm-hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I learned this week ... is that there are still some technical challenges that make implementing PLM challenging, but that is not what this post is about. The technical challenges include customization, data migration, and integration among others. See Oleg's post on the "3 main factors of mainstream PLM adoption" for more detail on each of these, and his views on why these three factors impact the adoption rate of PLM. I accept Oleg's premise on these factors (although we will likely continue to debate the relative priority of ERP integration) from a technical perspective. But I think any technical conversation about PLM implementation has to be complemented with a view on why PLM is really hard - you have to change the way people work in order to improve your product development performance and your product profitability.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/implementing-plm-hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

