<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Clarity on PLM &#187; Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/tag/strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm</link>
	<description>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/2.0.4" -->
	<itunes:summary>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Clarity on PLM</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Clarity on software for innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>What the Heck is Going on in the Engineering Software Market!?</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2011/engineering-software-market/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=engineering-software-market</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2011/engineering-software-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Rap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What I Learned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering Software Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VARs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=1145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking a look around at the engineering software market there are a few things that are clear and a lot of unanswered questions. One clear fact is that 2010 was a lot better than 2009 for most manufacturers and the engineering software vendors that serve them. From early indications, 2011 is looking even better. But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2011/engineering-software-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kalypso PLM Braintrust grows with Metafore Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/kalypso-metafore/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=kalypso-metafore</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/kalypso-metafore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[One-to-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arena Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dassault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalypso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metafore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omnify Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the chance to talk with ... Kalypso's managing partner Bill Poston and new Kalypso partner Andreas Lindenthal about the recent merger of their companies. PLM implementation experts are in high demand, with most many "big name" consulting firms carrying small teams. In this case, two smaller specialists in product innovation and PLM are coming together to make an even stronger team.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/kalypso-metafore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You CAD! Strategic Considerations for Multi-CAD versus Standardization</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/cad-versus-multi-cad/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cad-versus-multi-cad</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/cad-versus-multi-cad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Rap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constraints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi-CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tradeoffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick peek into some more research on standardizing CAD solutions, starting with a strategy to determine if you should standardize in the first place. Tech-Clarity Issue in Focus: CAD Standardization Strategies discusses considerations for operating in a multi-CAD environment versus standardizing on a single solution. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/cad-versus-multi-cad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Engineering Software &#8211; Strategies for 2010+</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/future-engineering-software-strategies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=future-engineering-software-strategies</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/future-engineering-software-strategies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Rap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A peek into more research on how manufacturers and vendors plan to react to the market for CAD, CAE, PLM, and other engineering software in 2010 and beyond.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/future-engineering-software-strategies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Closing the Loop on Product Innovation &#8211; Integrating ERP and PLM</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/closing-loop-product-innovation-erp-plm/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=closing-loop-product-innovation-erp-plm</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/closing-loop-product-innovation-erp-plm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research Rap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick peek into some research on closing the loop on product innovation through an integrated ERP-PLM strategy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/closing-loop-product-innovation-erp-plm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAP &#8211; Too Much, or Too Little Credit for PLM Efforts?</title>
		<link>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/sap-credit-plm/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sap-credit-plm</link>
		<comments>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/sap-credit-plm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[One-to-One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best-of-Breed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roadmap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/?p=702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the chance to talk with the PLM team at SAP recently to get an update on their plans and their progress to date. I struggled to understand why after all of the years of SAP getting too much credit for PLM, why they don't seem to be getting as much credit for their recent efforts as I would expect. What do you think?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/sap-credit-plm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

