• Tech-Clarity’s BOM Management Buyer’s Guide - Boost Performance with Digital BOMs provides criteria for manufacturers to evaluate software solutions to support their Bill of Material and product structure data and processes. Tech-Clarity’s Buyer’s Guides go beyond software functionality to provide a framework of requirements that impact implementation success and long-term ROI, including:Software requirements Implementation Integration User adoption Support Vendor characteristics / attributes Industry or unique business needsPlease enjoy the summary below, or click the report to … [ read more ]

    BOM Management Buyer’s Guide
  • This episode of Tech-Clarity TV explains how digital food and beverage companies improve agility, innovation, and productivity through better connectivity between R&D and the plant, streamlined production operations, and analytics.This video is part of a series of videos showing how digitalization can help food and beverage companies compete with innovative, digital industry competitors that are disrupting the status quo.The video series is sponsored by Siemens, a leader in digitalization for the food and beverage industry. For more information, see Tech-Clarity's series of guest posts on how … [ read more ]

    Producing Food and Beverages in the Digital Age (video)
  • How do chemical companies apply digital to the chem lab? Digitalization is streamlining the way companies innovate and bring products to market. Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown will share findings from his research on how chemical companies leverage the digital enterprise to improve efficiency and reduce cost while dealing with mounting regulatory and sustainability pressure.Register for the December 13 webcast (free of charge, registration required). Sponsored by Dassault Systemes BIOVIA. … [ read more ]

    Digitalizing the Chemical Lab (webcast)
  • This Tech-Clarity TV animation explains how companies can combat industry disruption from new, innovative companies and business models in the food and beverage industry by adopting the digital enterprise. It's no secret that companies like Amazon, Blue Apron, HelloFresh, and more are changing the way consumers and consumer packaged goods companies relate. This video shares how companies can become more innovative and agile to compete with these challengers through the value of digitalization, and provides an example of what a digital food and beverage company looks … [ read more ]

    Digitalization in the Food and Beverage Industry (Animation)
  • Join Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown in a lively discussion with Planview NPD Evangelist Carrie Nauyalis discussing how to effectively measure product innovation. The duo will discuss the pitfalls of measuring innovation based on prior performance, the top five measures companies can use to measure innovation capability, and what's needed to get started measuring innovation to improve outcomes.Register for the November 30th webcast now, sponsored by Planview (free of charge, registration required).  … [ read more ]

    Top 5 Metrics to Stop Measuring Innovation in the Rearview Mirror (webcast)

LCA and PLM – Two (Green) Peas in a Pod – Chat with Trayak

Share

I had the chance to talk with … Prashant Jagtap, CEO of Trayak, about designing products for sustainability. Prashant is a veteran of the PLM industry, and he and I had a great discussion about how design for sustainability fits into PLM. This post will share a bit of that discussion as well as a bit about Trayak.

Why is PLM the Place for Sustainable Design?

First, I want to share some of my discussion with Prashant on a general basis. I am a big proponent of getting compliance and sustainability right during product design. Why? Because like so many other product attributes, sustainability is really hard to accomplish once the design is locked in. Material choices and manufacturing process decisions clearly have a significant influence on the environmental impact of a product. They are also very difficult to change after a product has bee designed because late product changes often sub-optimize a lot of previous design decisions which can increase cost, degrade product performance, or at a minimum cause a lot of disruption through engineering changes (ECOs).

So earlier is better. But why in PLM?  Simply put, PLM is where the product data is. PLM has the bill of material (BOM) early in the product lifecycle. As PLM has matured it has extended to capture the manufacturing processes in a bill of process (BOP) as well. That is the right core of information required to conduct an effective lifecycle analysis (LCA). As the Tech-Clarity compliance/sustainability diagram above shows, making the right decisions requires a combination of product information and impact data. To me, this is an obvious extension of PLM. In fact, environmental compliance and sustainability is the example I use most frequently when I discuss the four dimensions of PLM expansion.

What does Trayak Do?

So other than sharing some common philosophy about how manufacturers can design more sustainable products, Prashant was excited to tell me about the progress Trayak is making. Their goal is to “make sustainable product design mainstream.” The idea is to put the right tools and information into engineers’ hands (or at least their desktops) so they can understand the environmental impact of their design decisions. Trayak believes that the current LCA tools are too complex, too expensive, require experts, and are too separated from the design process. I believe changing that could have a profound effect. Engineers would love to make more eco-friendly products, but face a myriad of tradeoffs and typically don’t have the right information at hand. How can you optimize what you don’t understand? How can you design for sustainability when you don’t know the impact of your decisions until after the fact? To me, solving those problems is the value Trayak has to offer.

What do they Offer?

Trayak offers three products:

  • EcoDesigner – helping engineers design for compliance using LCA techniques
  • EcoLabel – a tool to help grade BOMs and provide labeling information for compliance (for EPEAT regulations)
  • EcoScore – a broader solution that collects a wide range of factors/criteria about environmental impact (which could include LCA results) which could also be used to create scoring mechanisms to rate their product portfolio as they evaluate greener design options

Who do they Work with?

Here, to me, are two valuable facts about Trayak:

  • They understand CAD and PLM, and have integrated into Siemens PLM tools (including Teamcenter and Solid Edge) – Prashant’s history and experience play a big role here
  • They are LCA agnostic – Trayak does not believe that there is one right way to do LCA. In fact, they believe that some companies may already have a source of LCA information. Trayak is partnering with EcoInvent for data, but is built with the expectation that they will work with multiple sources of information. A very interesting approach. As more OEMs start to demand LCA information, what are the chances that suppliers will have to support more than one set of LCA calculations? Pretty good, I bet.

So that’s what I hear from Trayak, I hope you found it useful. What do you think? What else should I have asked them? Do you think the open approach to LCA will make a difference?

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Jim, this is excellent approach.Decisions on materials and manufacturing process shall be more and more biased by sustainability priorities. What is the impact on controllers and software to realize the functionalities ? PLM has to also support these changes in software architecture and software lifecycle.

    • I believe the more information we can provide to engineers as they are designing their products the better. For example, when choosing a material or a component they should have access to sustainability data. Providing that information in an integrated CAD/PLM environment seems like the best approach. In addition, there should be a process that reviews designs to identify issues/opportunities for improvement in product sustainability. For example, as new substances are regulated or environmental impact data is updated, existing BOMs should be analyzed for issues. I also think ad-hoc analysis is important, for example if companies would like to know the impact if a certain material was added to a watch list (for regulatory, commercial, political, customer requirements, or any other reason). These processes should access the most current BOM (and BOP if available) which is typically in PLM. So I would absolutely agrees that PLM has to support this.

      Thanks for sharing your perspective.

  2. Jim, this is excellent approach.Decisions on materials and manufacturing process shall be more and more biased by sustainability priorities. What is the impact on controllers and software to realize the functionalities ? PLM has to also support these changes in software architecture and software lifecycle.

    • I believe the more information we can provide to engineers as they are designing their products the better. For example, when choosing a material or a component they should have access to sustainability data. Providing that information in an integrated CAD/PLM environment seems like the best approach. In addition, there should be a process that reviews designs to identify issues/opportunities for improvement in product sustainability. For example, as new substances are regulated or environmental impact data is updated, existing BOMs should be analyzed for issues. I also think ad-hoc analysis is important, for example if companies would like to know the impact if a certain material was added to a watch list (for regulatory, commercial, political, customer requirements, or any other reason). These processes should access the most current BOM (and BOP if available) which is typically in PLM. So I would absolutely agrees that PLM has to support this.

      Thanks for sharing your perspective.

  3. The question shouldn’t be “Why is PLM the Place for Sustainable Design?,” it should be “Where doesn’t PLM have a place?” 

    This is a great article, I believe PLM should be implemented in all design processes…it just makes since.

  4. The question shouldn’t be “Why is PLM the Place for Sustainable Design?,” it should be “Where doesn’t PLM have a place?” 

    This is a great article, I believe PLM should be implemented in all design processes…it just makes since.

Speak Your Mind

*