• The How-to Guide for Adopting Model Based Definition (MBD) reveals advice and best practices for implementing MBD.  The guide explains why 89% of companies are happy they made the transition and benefits they enjoy as a result. The hardest part of adopting MBD is overcoming the cultural resistance to change. The guide identifies what other companies have done to make the adoption of MBD a success, both internally and with suppliers.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting model-based definition (MBD)Please … [ read more ]

    The How-to Guide for Adopting Model Based Definition (MBD) (eBook, survey findings)
  • How do leading manufacturers use cloud software to support product innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on cloud software for product innovation and manufacturing.If you already completed the survey  –> please share with a colleague or on social media using the “Share/Save” buttons above. If you haven’t taken the survey  –> please: CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE SURVEY NOW!Complete the survey and receive a free copy of the final report. In addition, 25 *eligible respondents will … [ read more ]

    Cloud for PLM and Manufacturing (survey invite)
  • This infographic shares survey results about quality and cost management in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. It visually communicates the results of our research that shows how Top Performing CPG companies are able to achieve better quality and better cost of quality, without trading one for the other. The research shares the methods these leading companies employ, including automation, integration, and a more holistic approach to managing quality.To learn more, please:View the full Stop Choosing Between Cost and Quality in CPG infographic from our sponsor Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA (free or … [ read more ]

    Choosing Cost versus Quality in CPG (infographic)
  • Jim Brown contributed a guest post, Innovation Platforms - the Operating System for the Digital Enterprise, on the value of innovation platforms published in the Dassault Systèmes' Navigate the Future blog. The post shares the value an integrated platform of solutions provides to engineers, the enterprise, and toward achieving digital transformation. The post also covers some basis of the innovation platform from people, process, and technology perspectives.Read the post now (free of charge, no registration required).   … [ read more ]

    Innovation Platforms are the Operating Systems for the Digital Enterprise (guest post)
  • Please join Tech-Clarity's Michelle Boucher, Mark Turner from Alcon Labs, and Swapan Jha from PTC on Tuesday September 12, 2017 for a discussion on the right software solution for medical device engineering. The discussion will feature an interactive discussion between the panelists coving topics such as:Challenges facing medical device manufacturers. Why to consider the complete product lifecycle with respect to:Managing product and requirements. Transitioning from document to product centric approaches. Enabling smart and connected products.The best selection criteria for … [ read more ]

    Selecting the Right PLM Software for Medical Device Engineering (webcast)

LCA and PLM – Two (Green) Peas in a Pod – Chat with Trayak

Share

I had the chance to talk with … Prashant Jagtap, CEO of Trayak, about designing products for sustainability. Prashant is a veteran of the PLM industry, and he and I had a great discussion about how design for sustainability fits into PLM. This post will share a bit of that discussion as well as a bit about Trayak.

Why is PLM the Place for Sustainable Design?

First, I want to share some of my discussion with Prashant on a general basis. I am a big proponent of getting compliance and sustainability right during product design. Why? Because like so many other product attributes, sustainability is really hard to accomplish once the design is locked in. Material choices and manufacturing process decisions clearly have a significant influence on the environmental impact of a product. They are also very difficult to change after a product has bee designed because late product changes often sub-optimize a lot of previous design decisions which can increase cost, degrade product performance, or at a minimum cause a lot of disruption through engineering changes (ECOs).

So earlier is better. But why in PLM?  Simply put, PLM is where the product data is. PLM has the bill of material (BOM) early in the product lifecycle. As PLM has matured it has extended to capture the manufacturing processes in a bill of process (BOP) as well. That is the right core of information required to conduct an effective lifecycle analysis (LCA). As the Tech-Clarity compliance/sustainability diagram above shows, making the right decisions requires a combination of product information and impact data. To me, this is an obvious extension of PLM. In fact, environmental compliance and sustainability is the example I use most frequently when I discuss the four dimensions of PLM expansion.

What does Trayak Do?

So other than sharing some common philosophy about how manufacturers can design more sustainable products, Prashant was excited to tell me about the progress Trayak is making. Their goal is to “make sustainable product design mainstream.” The idea is to put the right tools and information into engineers’ hands (or at least their desktops) so they can understand the environmental impact of their design decisions. Trayak believes that the current LCA tools are too complex, too expensive, require experts, and are too separated from the design process. I believe changing that could have a profound effect. Engineers would love to make more eco-friendly products, but face a myriad of tradeoffs and typically don’t have the right information at hand. How can you optimize what you don’t understand? How can you design for sustainability when you don’t know the impact of your decisions until after the fact? To me, solving those problems is the value Trayak has to offer.

What do they Offer?

Trayak offers three products:

  • EcoDesigner – helping engineers design for compliance using LCA techniques
  • EcoLabel – a tool to help grade BOMs and provide labeling information for compliance (for EPEAT regulations)
  • EcoScore – a broader solution that collects a wide range of factors/criteria about environmental impact (which could include LCA results) which could also be used to create scoring mechanisms to rate their product portfolio as they evaluate greener design options

Who do they Work with?

Here, to me, are two valuable facts about Trayak:

  • They understand CAD and PLM, and have integrated into Siemens PLM tools (including Teamcenter and Solid Edge) – Prashant’s history and experience play a big role here
  • They are LCA agnostic – Trayak does not believe that there is one right way to do LCA. In fact, they believe that some companies may already have a source of LCA information. Trayak is partnering with EcoInvent for data, but is built with the expectation that they will work with multiple sources of information. A very interesting approach. As more OEMs start to demand LCA information, what are the chances that suppliers will have to support more than one set of LCA calculations? Pretty good, I bet.

So that’s what I hear from Trayak, I hope you found it useful. What do you think? What else should I have asked them? Do you think the open approach to LCA will make a difference?

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Jim, this is excellent approach.Decisions on materials and manufacturing process shall be more and more biased by sustainability priorities. What is the impact on controllers and software to realize the functionalities ? PLM has to also support these changes in software architecture and software lifecycle.

    • I believe the more information we can provide to engineers as they are designing their products the better. For example, when choosing a material or a component they should have access to sustainability data. Providing that information in an integrated CAD/PLM environment seems like the best approach. In addition, there should be a process that reviews designs to identify issues/opportunities for improvement in product sustainability. For example, as new substances are regulated or environmental impact data is updated, existing BOMs should be analyzed for issues. I also think ad-hoc analysis is important, for example if companies would like to know the impact if a certain material was added to a watch list (for regulatory, commercial, political, customer requirements, or any other reason). These processes should access the most current BOM (and BOP if available) which is typically in PLM. So I would absolutely agrees that PLM has to support this.

      Thanks for sharing your perspective.

  2. Jim, this is excellent approach.Decisions on materials and manufacturing process shall be more and more biased by sustainability priorities. What is the impact on controllers and software to realize the functionalities ? PLM has to also support these changes in software architecture and software lifecycle.

    • I believe the more information we can provide to engineers as they are designing their products the better. For example, when choosing a material or a component they should have access to sustainability data. Providing that information in an integrated CAD/PLM environment seems like the best approach. In addition, there should be a process that reviews designs to identify issues/opportunities for improvement in product sustainability. For example, as new substances are regulated or environmental impact data is updated, existing BOMs should be analyzed for issues. I also think ad-hoc analysis is important, for example if companies would like to know the impact if a certain material was added to a watch list (for regulatory, commercial, political, customer requirements, or any other reason). These processes should access the most current BOM (and BOP if available) which is typically in PLM. So I would absolutely agrees that PLM has to support this.

      Thanks for sharing your perspective.

  3. The question shouldn’t be “Why is PLM the Place for Sustainable Design?,” it should be “Where doesn’t PLM have a place?” 

    This is a great article, I believe PLM should be implemented in all design processes…it just makes since.

  4. The question shouldn’t be “Why is PLM the Place for Sustainable Design?,” it should be “Where doesn’t PLM have a place?” 

    This is a great article, I believe PLM should be implemented in all design processes…it just makes since.

Speak Your Mind

*