• Top 5 Ways to Measure Product Innovation, Choosing Metrics to Drive Innovation Performance shares the importance of measuring innovation to improve innovation capability and outcomes. Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration required). For the full report, please visit our sponsor, Planview (free of charge, registration required). Why Measure Innovation? Companies know they’ll be rewarded for innovation. They’ve seen that product developers who set the agenda in their market and force their competitors to react have a distinct … [ read more ]

    Top 5 Ways to Measure Product Innovation (white paper)
  • This episode of Tech-Clarity TV explains how food and beverage companies can survive in the digital age as new, agile, innovative companies disrupt their markets.  It shares how these food and CPG companies can use analytics as a competitive tool to better sense and respond to customer needs and gain deeper understanding of their products, processes, and production. This video is part of a series of videos showing how digitalization can help food and beverage companies compete with innovative, digital industry competitors that are disrupting the status quo. The video series is sponsored by Siemens, a … [ read more ]

    The Analytics Opportunity for Food and Beverage in the Digital Age (video)
  • Tech-Clarity’s BOM Management Buyer’s Guide - Boost Performance with Digital BOMs provides criteria for manufacturers to evaluate software solutions to support their Bill of Material and product structure data and processes. Tech-Clarity’s Buyer’s Guides go beyond software functionality to provide a framework of requirements that impact implementation success and long-term ROI, including: Software requirements Implementation Integration User adoption Support Vendor characteristics / attributes Industry or unique business needs Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to … [ read more ]

    BOM Management Buyer’s Guide
  • This episode of Tech-Clarity TV explains how digital food and beverage companies improve agility, innovation, and productivity through better connectivity between R&D and the plant, streamlined production operations, and analytics. This video is part of a series of videos showing how digitalization can help food and beverage companies compete with innovative, digital industry competitors that are disrupting the status quo. The video series is sponsored by Siemens, a leader in digitalization for the food and beverage industry. For more information, see Tech-Clarity's series of guest posts on how … [ read more ]

    Producing Food and Beverages in the Digital Age (video)
  • How do chemical companies apply digital to the chem lab? Digitalization is streamlining the way companies innovate and bring products to market. Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown will share findings from his research on how chemical companies leverage the digital enterprise to improve efficiency and reduce cost while dealing with mounting regulatory and sustainability pressure. Register for the December 13 webcast (free of charge, registration required). Sponsored by Dassault Systemes BIOVIA. … [ read more ]

    Digitalizing the Chemical Lab (webcast)

A New Product Portfolio Management Opportunity for Engineering-Centric Businesses

Share

A quick peek into some research on … how product portfolio management (PPM) can be more closely tied to engineering projects. The research, Issue in Focus: Product Portfolio Management in a PLM Strategy – Closing the Loop on Product Planning explores the connection between PLM and PPM for manufacturers that focus on intense engineering programs as opposed to high-volume products like consumer packaged goods (CPG). I look forward to your thoughts as I shake off the cobwebs from a summer that involved too little attention to blogging. But it was a good summer, and I hope you enjoyed yours (or your winter for those of you in the Southern Hemisphere).

The Research Findings

Most of the research I have read – and written– on PPM in the past has focused primarily on fast-moving consumer goods. Clearly, consumer goods companies live and die based on a steady stream of new and innovative products with extremely short product lifecycles. But what about companies that focus on engineering-centric products like aircraft? Or organizations like Sandia Labs, interviewed for the paper, a multi-program engineering and science laboratory? Don’t they have to manage and balance their engineering investments? Do they have any special needs?

The research starts by reporting that the basics of PPM still apply, companies need to focus on the following four fundamentals:

  • Select and Maximize Product Portfolio
  • Resource and Enable Pipeline
  • Execute and Manage Projects
  • Determine and Monitor Product Value

Beyond that, the research points out that PPM processes are often disconnected from other product development and engineering processes. The paper then asks the question “What additional value can be achieved through a tighter integration between PPM and PLM, and from closing the gap between product planning and the reality of the underlying design and development efforts?”  In fast-moving consumer goods, the R&D project is complete before production begins. The die has been cast from a portfolio perspective by the time the product is released. In more engineering-intense industries, however, program management is ongoing during the entire project and real knowledge can replace early assumptions. This is where the opportunity lies to close the loop between the engineering program and the portfolio, so portfolio assumptions can be monitored and updated as the engineering proceeds. This is also true for fast-moving goods during the R&D process, of course.

Implications for Manufacturers

So why is this important? PLM have grown, as discussed in my Four Dimensions of PLM Expansion. Many PLM initiatives now include portfolio management in their scope. Further, PLM vendors including Siemens PLM, PTC, Dassault Systemes, and others have added PPM to their product suites. Enterprise vendors SAP and Oracle also have PPM offerings in addition to PLM. Does this present an opportunity for tighter integration? The paper does more good at bringing up the question than answering it. The most important advice in the research is “…manufacturers shouldn’t integrate because they can, they should find the right areas of value to focus in across the four core PPM processes.” I believe the integration opportunities will vary by company, but the good news is that the door has now been opened and the potential is there.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on portfolio management, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective.

Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  2. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  3. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  4. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  5. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting.

    It would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.

    Key solution requirements as I see them:
    – significantly reduce the product data input workload
    – live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members,
    – intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance)
    – intuitive documentation and distribution of decisions

  6. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

Speak Your Mind

*