• The How-to Guide for Adopting Model Based Definition (MBD) reveals advice and best practices for implementing MBD.  The guide explains why 89% of companies are happy they made the transition and benefits they enjoy as a result. The hardest part of adopting MBD is overcoming the cultural resistance to change. The guide identifies what other companies have done to make the adoption of MBD a success, both internally and with suppliers.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting model-based definition (MBD)Please … [ read more ]

    The How-to Guide for Adopting Model Based Definition (MBD) (eBook, survey findings)
  • How do leading manufacturers use cloud software to support product innovation, product development, engineering, and manufacturing?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on cloud software for product innovation and manufacturing.If you already completed the survey  –> please share with a colleague or on social media using the “Share/Save” buttons above. If you haven’t taken the survey  –> please: CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE SURVEY NOW!Complete the survey and receive a free copy of the final report. In addition, 25 *eligible respondents will … [ read more ]

    Cloud for PLM and Manufacturing (survey invite)
  • This infographic shares survey results about quality and cost management in the Consumer Packaged Goods industry. It visually communicates the results of our research that shows how Top Performing CPG companies are able to achieve better quality and better cost of quality, without trading one for the other. The research shares the methods these leading companies employ, including automation, integration, and a more holistic approach to managing quality.To learn more, please:View the full Stop Choosing Between Cost and Quality in CPG infographic from our sponsor Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA (free or … [ read more ]

    Choosing Cost versus Quality in CPG (infographic)
  • Jim Brown contributed a guest post, Innovation Platforms - the Operating System for the Digital Enterprise, on the value of innovation platforms published in the Dassault Systèmes' Navigate the Future blog. The post shares the value an integrated platform of solutions provides to engineers, the enterprise, and toward achieving digital transformation. The post also covers some basis of the innovation platform from people, process, and technology perspectives.Read the post now (free of charge, no registration required).   … [ read more ]

    Innovation Platforms are the Operating Systems for the Digital Enterprise (guest post)
  • Please join Tech-Clarity's Michelle Boucher, Mark Turner from Alcon Labs, and Swapan Jha from PTC on Tuesday September 12, 2017 for a discussion on the right software solution for medical device engineering. The discussion will feature an interactive discussion between the panelists coving topics such as:Challenges facing medical device manufacturers. Why to consider the complete product lifecycle with respect to:Managing product and requirements. Transitioning from document to product centric approaches. Enabling smart and connected products.The best selection criteria for … [ read more ]

    Selecting the Right PLM Software for Medical Device Engineering (webcast)

A New Product Portfolio Management Opportunity for Engineering-Centric Businesses

Share

A quick peek into some research on … how product portfolio management (PPM) can be more closely tied to engineering projects. The research, Issue in Focus: Product Portfolio Management in a PLM Strategy – Closing the Loop on Product Planning explores the connection between PLM and PPM for manufacturers that focus on intense engineering programs as opposed to high-volume products like consumer packaged goods (CPG). I look forward to your thoughts as I shake off the cobwebs from a summer that involved too little attention to blogging. But it was a good summer, and I hope you enjoyed yours (or your winter for those of you in the Southern Hemisphere).

The Research Findings

Most of the research I have read – and written– on PPM in the past has focused primarily on fast-moving consumer goods. Clearly, consumer goods companies live and die based on a steady stream of new and innovative products with extremely short product lifecycles. But what about companies that focus on engineering-centric products like aircraft? Or organizations like Sandia Labs, interviewed for the paper, a multi-program engineering and science laboratory? Don’t they have to manage and balance their engineering investments? Do they have any special needs?

The research starts by reporting that the basics of PPM still apply, companies need to focus on the following four fundamentals:

  • Select and Maximize Product Portfolio
  • Resource and Enable Pipeline
  • Execute and Manage Projects
  • Determine and Monitor Product Value

Beyond that, the research points out that PPM processes are often disconnected from other product development and engineering processes. The paper then asks the question “What additional value can be achieved through a tighter integration between PPM and PLM, and from closing the gap between product planning and the reality of the underlying design and development efforts?”  In fast-moving consumer goods, the R&D project is complete before production begins. The die has been cast from a portfolio perspective by the time the product is released. In more engineering-intense industries, however, program management is ongoing during the entire project and real knowledge can replace early assumptions. This is where the opportunity lies to close the loop between the engineering program and the portfolio, so portfolio assumptions can be monitored and updated as the engineering proceeds. This is also true for fast-moving goods during the R&D process, of course.

Implications for Manufacturers

So why is this important? PLM have grown, as discussed in my Four Dimensions of PLM Expansion. Many PLM initiatives now include portfolio management in their scope. Further, PLM vendors including Siemens PLM, PTC, Dassault Systemes, and others have added PPM to their product suites. Enterprise vendors SAP and Oracle also have PPM offerings in addition to PLM. Does this present an opportunity for tighter integration? The paper does more good at bringing up the question than answering it. The most important advice in the research is “…manufacturers shouldn’t integrate because they can, they should find the right areas of value to focus in across the four core PPM processes.” I believe the integration opportunities will vary by company, but the good news is that the door has now been opened and the potential is there.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on portfolio management, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective.

Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  2. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  3. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  4. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  5. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting.

    It would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.

    Key solution requirements as I see them:
    – significantly reduce the product data input workload
    – live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members,
    – intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance)
    – intuitive documentation and distribution of decisions

  6. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

Speak Your Mind

*