• Dassault Systèmes continues to make significant progress on the 3DExperience vision they laid out 5 years ago. This strategy has seen them transform from a software vendor offering distinct solutions for a variety of functional areas to a company that leads with a strong business transformation message backed up by a platform of solutions. I dropped "PLM" from the title of last year's strategy review. I feel even better about that decision a year later. They now have a broad software suite brought to market as solutions tailored to support key initiatives in the vertical industries they serve. As times goes … [ read more ]

    Dassault Systèmes Strategy 2017+
  • The Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies ebook explains how smaller companies in the high technology industry find themselves stuck between full-featured Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems that feel out of reach and less capable solutions including cloud-based file sharing or very basic data management applications. They know they can’t afford the errors and inefficiency inherent to informal data and process management, but can’t afford a large time, resource, and financial investment to fix their problems. Unfortunately simple solutions like web file sharing, while very attractive, fall … [ read more ]

    Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies
  • The How-to Guide to Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD  shares best practices for moving from 2D to 3D. The guide shares the reasons you should consider going from 2D to 3D, common challenges to avoid, and benefits enjoyed by other companies who gone to 3D. The guide then shares advice to make your switch from 2D to 3D CAD a success. The recommendations were developed by analyzing the responses of Top Performing companies and comparing them to Average Performing companies.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting … [ read more ]

    Best Practices for Going from 2D to 3D CAD
  • The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration … [ read more ]

    Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)
  • What type of experiences prepare engineering students the best for "real world" industry work? What should new graduates know when they start their first job?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on the engineering skills gap. We are exploring questions such as, what types of things do you look for in a new graduate? How can engineering colleges and universities improve their curriculum to better prepare students for today's modern products?  What concerns do you have about the future engineering workforce?Developing the future workforce is critical to the … [ read more ]

    What Skills Do You Wish Engineering Graduates Had? (Survey Invite)

A New Product Portfolio Management Opportunity for Engineering-Centric Businesses

Share

A quick peek into some research on … how product portfolio management (PPM) can be more closely tied to engineering projects. The research, Issue in Focus: Product Portfolio Management in a PLM Strategy – Closing the Loop on Product Planning explores the connection between PLM and PPM for manufacturers that focus on intense engineering programs as opposed to high-volume products like consumer packaged goods (CPG). I look forward to your thoughts as I shake off the cobwebs from a summer that involved too little attention to blogging. But it was a good summer, and I hope you enjoyed yours (or your winter for those of you in the Southern Hemisphere).

The Research Findings

Most of the research I have read – and written– on PPM in the past has focused primarily on fast-moving consumer goods. Clearly, consumer goods companies live and die based on a steady stream of new and innovative products with extremely short product lifecycles. But what about companies that focus on engineering-centric products like aircraft? Or organizations like Sandia Labs, interviewed for the paper, a multi-program engineering and science laboratory? Don’t they have to manage and balance their engineering investments? Do they have any special needs?

The research starts by reporting that the basics of PPM still apply, companies need to focus on the following four fundamentals:

  • Select and Maximize Product Portfolio
  • Resource and Enable Pipeline
  • Execute and Manage Projects
  • Determine and Monitor Product Value

Beyond that, the research points out that PPM processes are often disconnected from other product development and engineering processes. The paper then asks the question “What additional value can be achieved through a tighter integration between PPM and PLM, and from closing the gap between product planning and the reality of the underlying design and development efforts?”  In fast-moving consumer goods, the R&D project is complete before production begins. The die has been cast from a portfolio perspective by the time the product is released. In more engineering-intense industries, however, program management is ongoing during the entire project and real knowledge can replace early assumptions. This is where the opportunity lies to close the loop between the engineering program and the portfolio, so portfolio assumptions can be monitored and updated as the engineering proceeds. This is also true for fast-moving goods during the R&D process, of course.

Implications for Manufacturers

So why is this important? PLM have grown, as discussed in my Four Dimensions of PLM Expansion. Many PLM initiatives now include portfolio management in their scope. Further, PLM vendors including Siemens PLM, PTC, Dassault Systemes, and others have added PPM to their product suites. Enterprise vendors SAP and Oracle also have PPM offerings in addition to PLM. Does this present an opportunity for tighter integration? The paper does more good at bringing up the question than answering it. The most important advice in the research is “…manufacturers shouldn’t integrate because they can, they should find the right areas of value to focus in across the four core PPM processes.” I believe the integration opportunities will vary by company, but the good news is that the door has now been opened and the potential is there.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on portfolio management, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective.

Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  2. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  3. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  4. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  5. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting.

    It would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.

    Key solution requirements as I see them:
    – significantly reduce the product data input workload
    – live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members,
    – intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance)
    – intuitive documentation and distribution of decisions

  6. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

Speak Your Mind

*