• This infographic shares the importance of developing a cohesive digital thread when developing formulated products in the consumer packaged goods industry. The digital thread should be driven by customer requirements and incorporate the recipe / formulation, specifications, packaging design, compliance information, claims, cautions, ingredients, labeling, artwork, and more to provide a full view of the product and it's design history. An effective CPG Digital Thread relies on an integrated Product Innovation Platform to connect product data from early in the front end of innovation through development, … [ read more ]

    The CPG Digital Thread (infographic)
  • Join Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown on this webinar sharing  recent survey results from almost 200 Consumer Packaged Goods companies, delving into their quality issue and how top performing CPG companies achieve better quality without suffering from excess internal cost. Learn the process, organizational, and technology approaches that Top Performers leverage to overcome their challenges and drive cost-effective quality. This Business Review Webinars event is brought to you by Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA. Register for the June 20th webcast now (free of charge, registration required). All registrants will … [ read more ]

    Cost Effective Quality in CPG (webcast, survey results)
  • On Thursday June 8, 2017  please join Michelle Boucher as she conducts a live interview with Mark Turner, Technical Manager for Development IT at Alcon, a Novartis Division. They will focus on key topics for medical device companies, including the Case for Quality. During the discussion, Michelle will share research on medical device industry trends. She will also discuss the implications for the Case for Quality and offered advice to efficiently manage regulatory compliance. Throughout the discussion, she will have an interactive conversation with Mark Turner. Mark will reveal how Alcon addresses their … [ read more ]

    Live Interview – Medical Devices: Making the Right Choice — Your Case for Quality
  • This eBook shares survey results analyzing companies' ability to hit new product development (NPD) targets, then offers seven practical tips identified by the research as best practice processes, organization, and technology leveraged by the top performing product developers. The research provides recommendations to companies based on the approaches taken by the Top Performers, those that are able to outperform their competitors in revenue growth, margin expansion, and delivering innovative products to market. Please enjoy the summary below. For the full report, please visit our sponsor Autodesk (free … [ read more ]

    7 Ways to Outperform Your Competitors in NPD (eBook, survey results)
  • Medical Device companies have the opportunity to leverage digitalization and the digital enterprise to develop innovative products and bring them to market quickly. Watch this edition of Tech-Clarity TV to learn about the digitalization opportunity and stay tuned for the rest of the series detailing specific business improvement opportunities including: Digital design Digital design transfer Paperless manufacturing The video shares how medical device manufacturers are embracing digitalization and gaining significant benefits including faster time to market, increased quality, and improved … [ read more ]

    The Digitalization Opportunity for Medical Device Companies (video)

A New Product Portfolio Management Opportunity for Engineering-Centric Businesses

Share

A quick peek into some research on … how product portfolio management (PPM) can be more closely tied to engineering projects. The research, Issue in Focus: Product Portfolio Management in a PLM Strategy – Closing the Loop on Product Planning explores the connection between PLM and PPM for manufacturers that focus on intense engineering programs as opposed to high-volume products like consumer packaged goods (CPG). I look forward to your thoughts as I shake off the cobwebs from a summer that involved too little attention to blogging. But it was a good summer, and I hope you enjoyed yours (or your winter for those of you in the Southern Hemisphere).

The Research Findings

Most of the research I have read – and written– on PPM in the past has focused primarily on fast-moving consumer goods. Clearly, consumer goods companies live and die based on a steady stream of new and innovative products with extremely short product lifecycles. But what about companies that focus on engineering-centric products like aircraft? Or organizations like Sandia Labs, interviewed for the paper, a multi-program engineering and science laboratory? Don’t they have to manage and balance their engineering investments? Do they have any special needs?

The research starts by reporting that the basics of PPM still apply, companies need to focus on the following four fundamentals:

  • Select and Maximize Product Portfolio
  • Resource and Enable Pipeline
  • Execute and Manage Projects
  • Determine and Monitor Product Value

Beyond that, the research points out that PPM processes are often disconnected from other product development and engineering processes. The paper then asks the question “What additional value can be achieved through a tighter integration between PPM and PLM, and from closing the gap between product planning and the reality of the underlying design and development efforts?”  In fast-moving consumer goods, the R&D project is complete before production begins. The die has been cast from a portfolio perspective by the time the product is released. In more engineering-intense industries, however, program management is ongoing during the entire project and real knowledge can replace early assumptions. This is where the opportunity lies to close the loop between the engineering program and the portfolio, so portfolio assumptions can be monitored and updated as the engineering proceeds. This is also true for fast-moving goods during the R&D process, of course.

Implications for Manufacturers

So why is this important? PLM have grown, as discussed in my Four Dimensions of PLM Expansion. Many PLM initiatives now include portfolio management in their scope. Further, PLM vendors including Siemens PLM, PTC, Dassault Systemes, and others have added PPM to their product suites. Enterprise vendors SAP and Oracle also have PPM offerings in addition to PLM. Does this present an opportunity for tighter integration? The paper does more good at bringing up the question than answering it. The most important advice in the research is “…manufacturers shouldn’t integrate because they can, they should find the right areas of value to focus in across the four core PPM processes.” I believe the integration opportunities will vary by company, but the good news is that the door has now been opened and the potential is there.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on portfolio management, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective.

Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  2. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  3. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  4. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

  5. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting.

    It would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.

    Key solution requirements as I see them:
    – significantly reduce the product data input workload
    – live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members,
    – intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance)
    – intuitive documentation and distribution of decisions

  6. Product Portfolio Management would seem to be the crucial but somewhat intractable aspect of an innovation management platform. Many PLM users only run portfolio processes once a year spending sometimes hundreds of man hours in preparation of a product portfolio focused meeting. nnIt would seem that a successful PPM solution will need to not only provide intuitive analysis to support strategic portfolio decision making but more significantly reduce the data collection and load effort to the extent that portfolio reviews can go form a once or twice a year a event into a monthly or even weekly one.nnKey solution requirements as I see them:n- significantly reduce the product data input workloadn- live population of (proposal, project and SKU) members, n- intuitive analysis and goal setting (across and over time for markets, resources and finance) n- intuitive documentation and distribution of decisionsn

Speak Your Mind

*