Webcast on Leveraging the Cloud in Engineering

Jim Brown joins Carl Smith of IMAGINiT as they discuss how to improve collaboration, time-to-market, and efficiency using the cloud in Engineering. Register for the webcast (free of charge, registration required).     … [ read more ]


Product Data Integration Humor / Interview on PLM Customization with Stan Przybylinski

We take a silly look at solving the problem of fragmented product data and processes with a mythical integration product called FlōSēl. Then we get down to business with Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown and CIMdata's Stan Przybylinski discussing the reasons people customize their PLM systems, the potential downfalls … [ read more ]


How Much PDM is Right for You? (animated video)

This short, animated Tech-Clarity TV episode explores the different Product Data Management options available to manufacturers. It explains that value of full-featured PDM as a step beyond CAD File Management and a stepping stone toward PLM for more advanced capabilities as … [ read more ]


Materials Innovation Survey

How are leading companies enabling their teams to be more innovative? How are they taking advantage of the latest material advancements? Please share your experience. We are conducting new research on product innovation. This survey is targeted at those who either develop new materials or look to use new … [ read more ]


PLM Beyond Managing CAD

Product Lifecycle Management Beyond Managing CAD, The Business Value of PLM shares survey results exploring the value of PLM beyond managing design files such as CAD. While the research finds that most Top Performers manage CAD in PLM, they also do a lot more. The research shows that Top Performers - the ones … [ read more ]


Tech4PD Debate on Social Tech in Product Development and Beam me Up Chad!


The latest edition of Tech4PD shares Tech-Clarity’s view that social techniques are ready for prime time in product development. Chad Jackson of Lifecycle Insights contends that it will take time, in particular because social capabilities are more likely to be adopted in formal business processes. I fundamentally disagree and believe that the low-hanging fruit is in ad-hoc processes where product developers and engineers need to share information. The beauty is, you get to decide who won the debate. Watch Tech4PD and then vote here. You can also read some lively discussion between Chad and yours truly.

And speaking of winning debates, the loser of this round has to get a temporary Tech4PD tattoo. But Chad last our previous debate on who has to enable simulation drive design. So in this episode, you see the consequence of that debate – Chad presenting at a conference in a Star Trek uniform. Priceless. That makes brushing my teeth with wasabi after losing the first debate all worthwhile.


  1. […] Tech4PD Debate on Social Tech in Product Development and Beam … […]

Speak Your Mind