• Dassault Systèmes continues to make significant progress on the 3DExperience vision they laid out 5 years ago. This strategy has seen them transform from a software vendor offering distinct solutions for a variety of functional areas to a company that leads with a strong business transformation message backed up by a platform of solutions. I dropped "PLM" from the title of last year's strategy review. I feel even better about that decision a year later. They now have a broad software suite brought to market as solutions tailored to support key initiatives in the vertical industries they serve. As times goes … [ read more ]

    Dassault Systèmes Strategy 2017+
  • The Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies ebook explains how smaller companies in the high technology industry find themselves stuck between full-featured Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems that feel out of reach and less capable solutions including cloud-based file sharing or very basic data management applications. They know they can’t afford the errors and inefficiency inherent to informal data and process management, but can’t afford a large time, resource, and financial investment to fix their problems. Unfortunately simple solutions like web file sharing, while very attractive, fall … [ read more ]

    Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies
  • The How-to Guide to Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD  shares best practices for moving from 2D to 3D. The guide shares the reasons you should consider going from 2D to 3D, common challenges to avoid, and benefits enjoyed by other companies who gone to 3D. The guide then shares advice to make your switch from 2D to 3D CAD a success. The recommendations were developed by analyzing the responses of Top Performing companies and comparing them to Average Performing companies.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting … [ read more ]

    Best Practices for Going from 2D to 3D CAD
  • The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration … [ read more ]

    Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)
  • What type of experiences prepare engineering students the best for "real world" industry work? What should new graduates know when they start their first job?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on the engineering skills gap. We are exploring questions such as, what types of things do you look for in a new graduate? How can engineering colleges and universities improve their curriculum to better prepare students for today's modern products?  What concerns do you have about the future engineering workforce?Developing the future workforce is critical to the … [ read more ]

    What Skills Do You Wish Engineering Graduates Had? (Survey Invite)

Tech-Clarity TV: Environmental Compliance and the Product Lifecycle

Share

Hear Jim Brown share his views on … efficiently and effectively meeting product environmental compliance demands using PLM software. This episode shares some interesting findings from Tech-Clarity’s Understanding Product Development Tradeoffs: Designing Products for Sustainability, Cost, and Compliance.

This is the latest edition of Tech-Clarity TV, let us know what you think.

The topics included in this episode include:

  • Continued regulatory pressure from multiple sources
  • Top 10 environmental regulations faced by global manufacturer
  • Common negative business impacts from difficulty designing products for compliance, cost, and sustainability (including time to market and missed shipments)
  • Increasing frequency (trend data) of these damaging business impacts
  • Framework for environmental product compliance that shows the steps and capabilities required to design for compliance
  • Discussion of how PLM meets the Tech-Clarity Compliance Framework

Let us know what you think. Do you agree? Disagree? Have a great example to share? Please see the related post, download the report, or review more free research and white papers about PDM, PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Jim, how exactly is PLM helping in the compliance and sustainability muddle? There should be a live link to a global compliance tracker (is there one?)that keeps itself updated on developments. PLM will only bring in this feed and reconcile it with the BOM. For something like RoHS and REACH this makes sense since it is related to material compositions and hence impacting all items of the BOM. But what about product level compliance? Does PLM own a clear enough product definition such that an automatic comparison with above ‘compliance tracker’ can be done? 

    • I guess it depends on what kind of compliance you are talking about. Compliance is a big topic. I was really addressing environmental compliance which, as you point out, has a lot to do with material composition. Sustainability extends from there, and has to do with materials as well as manufacturing processes, energy, water usage, emissions, etc.  I do think PLM is a very good place to address environmental compliance and I have seen this work successfully at quite a few companies.

      But does PLM have a rich enough model of the product to provide everything? Probably not without some work. For example how many companies have all of their supplier parts and substitutes in their BOM? That may need some work to support compliance. And how many have a full manufactured BOM in PLM at all, versus a subset from an engineering perspective. And if we are moving beyond BOM to a bill or process (BOP) fewer companies are ready in their PLM system. But I propose they are more ready there than in other systems like ERP. For one thing, the information comes to late because you need to make the tradeoffs between compliance, performance, cost, and a host of other things as early in design as possible or the windows of opportunity start to close.

      I hope I helped with your question, if not let me know what kind of compliance issues you are talking about. It might turn out that PLM is not the right place at all, it certainly doesn’t solve all compliance problems!

      Thanks for commenting,
      Jim

      • Hi Jim. As always thanks for the propmpt response. What I meant by compliance was about the finished product like a UL or EN compliance at the product level. Lets take EMI EMC for example. It has to do with design rather than the materials.  Now, the factors that come into the picture could also include market based inputs like compliance for a particular global region. Currently its a difficult enough task to identify the regulations that apply to product. The question is how do you identify this early enough so that the designers can make use of the information?

        As always its a pleasure to read your posts
        Thanks
        Shyam

        • Shyam,
          I think you “jinxed” me by thanking for my fast response, I was really slow at replying this time. Sorry! Thank you for the continued discussion, those kinds of regulations are not as easy to analyze in an automated way, to my knowledge.

          You bring up some very interesting points.

          – Before you can comply, you need to know what you need to comply with. I have a framework that addresses environmental compliance, but as I mention in this post () there are many other regulations. Know what the regulations are, where they apply, and how they are actually enforced has got to be step #1 to compliance. Or this link shows a more humorous example of unexpected regulatory issues. http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/compliance-wakeup-manufacturers/

          2 – Once you know what you need to comply with, you need product data. I think we agree that PLM is a great source of information

          3 – Then, you need to be able to analyze for compliance. For environmental compliance, a lot of progress has been made: http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/environmental-product-compliance-sustainable/, although there is no relief in sight for regulatory pressures: http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2011/survey-sustainability/.

          But for something like UL compliance, there are a couple of issues. The first is that I am not aware of any tools that can automatically review CAD designs and find UL problems. They may exist, but I don’t know of them. The second is that the designs need to be certified by a 3rd party. In this case, I have seen some great examples of people submitting electronic designs to regulators (FAA, for example) to electronically certify designs. The collaboration and visualization capabilities in PLM can really help there.

          Another part of the issue is storing third party (or internal) testing results. Here it makes total sense to link test results rest of the product design by including them in PLM. More to come on linking requirements to testing in an upcoming report, by the way.

          Then there are the other parts of the compliance framework including correcting any issues found, documenting compliance, and then closing the loop back to design. PLM can help here too.

          But what tools exist for other compliance checking? It sounds like UL listing, for example, would be a great CAD add-on to check designs for panel gaps, etc. Does anybody know of one? Or examples for other compliance issues?

          Thanks!
          Jim

  2. Jim, how exactly is PLM helping in the compliance and sustainability muddle? There should be a live link to a global compliance tracker (is there one?)that keeps itself updated on developments. PLM will only bring in this feed and reconcile it with the BOM. For something like RoHS and REACH this makes sense since it is related to material compositions and hence impacting all items of the BOM. But what about product level compliance? Does PLM own a clear enough product definition such that an automatic comparison with above ‘compliance tracker’ can be done? 

    • I guess it depends on what kind of compliance you are talking about. Compliance is a big topic. I was really addressing environmental compliance which, as you point out, has a lot to do with material composition. Sustainability extends from there, and has to do with materials as well as manufacturing processes, energy, water usage, emissions, etc.  I do think PLM is a very good place to address environmental compliance and I have seen this work successfully at quite a few companies.

      But does PLM have a rich enough model of the product to provide everything? Probably not without some work. For example how many companies have all of their supplier parts and substitutes in their BOM? That may need some work to support compliance. And how many have a full manufactured BOM in PLM at all, versus a subset from an engineering perspective. And if we are moving beyond BOM to a bill or process (BOP) fewer companies are ready in their PLM system. But I propose they are more ready there than in other systems like ERP. For one thing, the information comes to late because you need to make the tradeoffs between compliance, performance, cost, and a host of other things as early in design as possible or the windows of opportunity start to close.

      I hope I helped with your question, if not let me know what kind of compliance issues you are talking about. It might turn out that PLM is not the right place at all, it certainly doesn’t solve all compliance problems!

      Thanks for commenting,
      Jim

      • Hi Jim. As always thanks for the propmpt response. What I meant by compliance was about the finished product like a UL or EN compliance at the product level. Lets take EMI EMC for example. It has to do with design rather than the materials.  Now, the factors that come into the picture could also include market based inputs like compliance for a particular global region. Currently its a difficult enough task to identify the regulations that apply to product. The question is how do you identify this early enough so that the designers can make use of the information?

        As always its a pleasure to read your posts
        Thanks
        Shyam

        • Shyam,
          I think you “jinxed” me by thanking for my fast response, I was really slow at replying this time. Sorry! Thank you for the continued discussion, those kinds of regulations are not as easy to analyze in an automated way, to my knowledge.

          You bring up some very interesting points.

          – Before you can comply, you need to know what you need to comply with. I have a framework that addresses environmental compliance, but as I mention in this post () there are many other regulations. Know what the regulations are, where they apply, and how they are actually enforced has got to be step #1 to compliance. Or this link shows a more humorous example of unexpected regulatory issues. http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/compliance-wakeup-manufacturers/

          2 – Once you know what you need to comply with, you need product data. I think we agree that PLM is a great source of information

          3 – Then, you need to be able to analyze for compliance. For environmental compliance, a lot of progress has been made: http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2009/environmental-product-compliance-sustainable/, although there is no relief in sight for regulatory pressures: http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2011/survey-sustainability/.

          But for something like UL compliance, there are a couple of issues. The first is that I am not aware of any tools that can automatically review CAD designs and find UL problems. They may exist, but I don’t know of them. The second is that the designs need to be certified by a 3rd party. In this case, I have seen some great examples of people submitting electronic designs to regulators (FAA, for example) to electronically certify designs. The collaboration and visualization capabilities in PLM can really help there.

          Another part of the issue is storing third party (or internal) testing results. Here it makes total sense to link test results rest of the product design by including them in PLM. More to come on linking requirements to testing in an upcoming report, by the way.

          Then there are the other parts of the compliance framework including correcting any issues found, documenting compliance, and then closing the loop back to design. PLM can help here too.

          But what tools exist for other compliance checking? It sounds like UL listing, for example, would be a great CAD add-on to check designs for panel gaps, etc. Does anybody know of one? Or examples for other compliance issues?

          Thanks!
          Jim

Speak Your Mind

*