• Five Ways Shape Search Drives Business Value shares the shortcomings of traditional search methodologies and how geometric search can complement them to drive new business value. The report includes some basics about shape search, five tangible ways it can improve business performance, and an example of how to calculate the ROI of a shape search investment.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report or title to view the full PDF courtesy of our sponsor Siemens PLM (free of charge, no registration required).For more information, please visit the Siemens PLM Community blog to read the Shape … [ read more ]

    Five Ways Shape Search Drives Business Value (eBook)
  • Jim Brown contributed a guest post to the Siemens PLM Community blog discussing how R&D in the food and beverage industry can step up to the digital age to combat smaller, innovative companies that embrace the digital enterprise. This is the first of several posts that drill down on Surviving the New Competitive Landscape in Food and Beverage, a post that shares three ways that consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies can start their digitalization journey and discusses how that can help them avoid industry disruption.The first opportunity we're looking into is how the digital enterprise can improve … [ read more ]

    R&D Enters the Digital Age (guest post)
  • Please join Tech-Clarity's Michelle Boucher, Mark Turner from Alcon Labs, and Swapan Jha from PTC on Tuesday September 12, 2017 for a discussion on the right software solution for medical device engineering. The discussion will feature an interactive discussion between the panelists coving topics such as:Challenges facing medical device manufacturers. Why to consider the complete product lifecycle with respect to:Managing product and requirements. Transitioning from document to product centric approaches. Enabling smart and connected products.The best selection criteria for … [ read more ]

    Selecting the Right PLM Software for Medical Device Engineering (webcast)
  • Jim Brown contributed a guest post to the Siemens PLM Community blog discussing the opportunity for food and beverage companies to leverage digitalization and the digital enterprise to combat market disruption from new, innovate companies that are challenging current industry leaders. The post offers several ways that consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies can get started on their digital journey, achieve tangible business value, and combat challengers like Blue Apron and Amazon Fresh that are disrupting the status quo.The full post, Surviving the New Competitive Landscape in Food and Beverage, can be … [ read more ]

    Digitalization in Food and Beverage (guest post)
  • Dassault Systèmes continues to make significant progress on the 3DExperience vision they laid out 5 years ago. This strategy has seen them transform from a software vendor offering distinct solutions for a variety of functional areas to a company that leads with a strong business transformation message backed up by a platform of solutions. I dropped "PLM" from the title of last year's strategy review. I feel even better about that decision a year later. They now have a broad software suite brought to market as solutions tailored to support key initiatives in the vertical industries they serve. As times goes … [ read more ]

    Dassault Systèmes Strategy 2017+

Solving PLM Process Problems with Kenesto

Share

I had the chance to talk with the team at Kenesto to understand how their new product helps companies improve product development and product lifecycle management challenges through process automation. I also wrote about them in an upcoming article about alternative solutions that solve PLM problems. They are an interesting company with some strong credentials in both PLM and process automation, and they are bringing a unique solution to market. They are bringing a unique solution to market, challenging the traditional solutions by offering something valuable yet less complex.

What do they Do?

Kenesto helps companies automate business processes. For example, if a company needs to send a document like an engineering change order (ECO) to several people for input and/or approval, they could use Kenesto to route the communication to the right people and make sure that it progresses in the right order. They can also attach information (like an ECO form) to the process. Making sure that everybody is on the same page and acting on the process as they should be keeps things moving efficiently and hopefully prevents things from falling in between the cracks. Or more likely, falling into an overloaded inbox. Most of these communications today are via e-mail, which quickly becomes a mess when people start to forward/reply and there are suddenly multiple threads and instances of the original communication. Instead, their is one central process, and e-mail is used only for notification when it is time to act.

Kenesto solves some of the challenges caused by e-mail, but also aims to keep things simple. Unlike some of the more rigid, pre-defined process automation tools, Kenesto was design to make it very easy to implement ad-hoc processes. As the team explained, the solution is built on the premise that people know the process or define one as they go. This contrasts with solutions where processes are effectively programmed (and/or rules-based) that are built to enforce compliance with a specific process. They did mention, however, that you can predefine processes if you like, which certainly makes a lot of sense.

What do they Offer

So what is Kenesto? That is an interesting question. The website has a clear statement, “Business process automation for manufacturers.” In a discussion on Kenesto in Engineering Matters, Kenesto CEO Mike Payne disagreed with me when I said Kenesto is a BPMS. He pointed out Gartner’s definition of a BPMS to explain why the solution is not one. It is true, Kenesto does not fit that model. If I recall my history correctly, BPMS started with some really great workflow / business process automation concepts before it exploded and was assimilated into enterprise integration architecture vendors. So I will go on record saying Kenesto is not a BPMS by that definition, far from it. To me, though, it was what BPMS was meant to be before it became middleware. I guess I am not so concerned about what “bucket” to put it into. Analysts and software vendors often spend a lot of energy worrying about what category a solution fits in, and admittedly there are some practical considerations. But more importantly, I would rather focus on what it does.

Kenesto manages the flow of work and information between concerned parties. Call it what you want. The important things to realize from my perspective are:

  • Product development / product lifecycle management involve lots of people, and they need to communicate. Kenesto does that.
  • That communication benefits from the ability to share information with the group. Kenesto does that through attachments (and some level of data, that I still need to understand a bit better).
  • The communication benefits from having a status and named participants, with knowledge of what has been done and who is due to act. Kenesto does that.
  • The communication should span corporate boundaries and be easy to include new people. Cloud solutions like Kenesto offer that.
  • The company benefits from having an audit trail of that communication. Kenesto does that.
  • There is value in master data management / product data management where you have “one version of the truth” that is revision controlled so everybody always accesses the current information. From what I can see, Kenesto isn’t designed to do that.
  • BPMS systems went from a simple concept to being highly technical, structured, complex systems. From what I can see, Kenesto doesn’t do that either.

So what is Kenesto?

It is Kenesto.  😉

OK, I am an analyst so I have to try to make some category comparisons or I have to turn in my analyst card. Chad’s article is titled “A New Take on PLM” and I have heard others say similar things. I have heard whispers that Kenesto will add more data management capabilities, although at this time they have chosen not to integrate with lower level systems like PDM. Is this part of a new approach that separates PLM and PDM into separate layers and solutions, similar to what Autodesk is doing with their PLM 360 cloud PLM solution? Is it in fact the beginnings of a cloud PLM solution? My take is that many companies could use it to solve PLM problems in a simple way, and that might be enough for them. Or if they have a PDM system in place, they could use this to drive their processes. Even if they have PLM, this kind of communication / process automation tool can add value. The bottom line is that Kenesto is bringing process automation and manufacturing / PLM expertise together to solve some problems in a new and interesting way, and there is a place for it in many of today’s manufacturing companies.

So that’s what I hear from Kenesto, I hope you found it useful. What do you think? What else should I have asked them?

Speak Your Mind

*