• Tech-Clarity’s BOM Management Buyer’s Guide - Boost Performance with Digital BOMs provides criteria for manufacturers to evaluate software solutions to support their Bill of Material and product structure data and processes. Tech-Clarity’s Buyer’s Guides go beyond software functionality to provide a framework of requirements that impact implementation success and long-term ROI, including:Software requirements Implementation Integration User adoption Support Vendor characteristics / attributes Industry or unique business needsPlease enjoy the summary below, or click the report to … [ read more ]

    BOM Management Buyer’s Guide
  • This episode of Tech-Clarity TV explains how digital food and beverage companies improve agility, innovation, and productivity through better connectivity between R&D and the plant, streamlined production operations, and analytics.This video is part of a series of videos showing how digitalization can help food and beverage companies compete with innovative, digital industry competitors that are disrupting the status quo.The video series is sponsored by Siemens, a leader in digitalization for the food and beverage industry. For more information, see Tech-Clarity's series of guest posts on how … [ read more ]

    Producing Food and Beverages in the Digital Age (video)
  • How do chemical companies apply digital to the chem lab? Digitalization is streamlining the way companies innovate and bring products to market. Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown will share findings from his research on how chemical companies leverage the digital enterprise to improve efficiency and reduce cost while dealing with mounting regulatory and sustainability pressure.Register for the December 13 webcast (free of charge, registration required). Sponsored by Dassault Systemes BIOVIA. … [ read more ]

    Digitalizing the Chemical Lab (webcast)
  • This Tech-Clarity TV animation explains how companies can combat industry disruption from new, innovative companies and business models in the food and beverage industry by adopting the digital enterprise. It's no secret that companies like Amazon, Blue Apron, HelloFresh, and more are changing the way consumers and consumer packaged goods companies relate. This video shares how companies can become more innovative and agile to compete with these challengers through the value of digitalization, and provides an example of what a digital food and beverage company looks … [ read more ]

    Digitalization in the Food and Beverage Industry (Animation)
  • Join Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown in a lively discussion with Planview NPD Evangelist Carrie Nauyalis discussing how to effectively measure product innovation. The duo will discuss the pitfalls of measuring innovation based on prior performance, the top five measures companies can use to measure innovation capability, and what's needed to get started measuring innovation to improve outcomes.Register for the November 30th webcast now, sponsored by Planview (free of charge, registration required).  … [ read more ]

    Top 5 Metrics to Stop Measuring Innovation in the Rearview Mirror (webcast)

The Facts About Managing Product Data

Share

The Facts about Managing Product Data – The Real Story on PDM Value and Accessibility offers insights to help uncover the truth about managing product data. The research shares analysis of over 2,500 responses to a multi-national survey investigating the challenges, uses, and implementation experiences of companies that use CAD files. The analysis shows that Top Performers – those with better ability to develop products efficiently, design high quality products, develop products quickly, and meet design project / program cost targets – are more likely to use PDM. It also uncovers some interesting facts, for example that only 8% of manufacturers without PDM report that they don’t have problems managing data.

Given that so many that could benefit from PDM haven’t implemented it, the research reviews the barriers to PDM adoption. Specifically the report evaluates the belief that PDM has to take a lot of time and cost a lot of money to implement. The findings are intended to help companies make a facts-based decision on how PDM can help them improve their business by clearing up some common urban legends surrounding data management. For example, some say that companies that primarily use 2D CAD and office documents don’t benefit from PDM, which the data shows is simply not true.

Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report or title to download the full PDF (free of charge, no registration required).

For more information on managing product data please visit our sponsor, Autodesk, and their Data Management Microsite.

This paper has been translated into local languages thanks to our sponsor, Autodesk.

Note: For those that responded to the survey, we have selected 200 to receive an gift card as an incentive. We are in the process of distributing those.

Table of Contents

  • Executive Overview
  • Benefits of Effective Data Management
  • Design Challenges and Impacts
  • Identifying the Top Performers
  • Evaluating Data Management Approaches
  • So Why Doesn’t Everyone Use PDM?
  • The “We Don’t Use 3D” Myth
  • The PDM Time and Cost Misconception
  • The “We’re too Small for PDM” Myth
  • Misconception that PDM is “All or Nothing”
  • The Fallacy that “PDM is Only for Managing CAD Files”
  • PDM is “Just an Engineering Tool”
  • Conclusion
  • Recommendations
  • About the Author
  • About the Research

Executive Overview

Product Data Management (PDM) helps companies improve the way they control, access, and share critical, product-related files and information. But perhaps more important than what PDM does, are the benefits that PDM delivers. The Tech-Clarity report The Business Value of Product Data Management explains that companies gain strategic business benefits from PDM including improved time to market, better product quality, increased innovation, improved efficiency, reduced product cost, and more. Further, our Best Practices for Managing Design Data survey concludes that operational PDM improvements “lead to better product profitability and business performance.”

The value of PDM is really not disputed. But not everyone is managing data. Why? There are many reasons cited, but it’s not what you might think. It’s not because companies don’t need it. In fact, the study results show that only 8% of companies not using PDM say it’s because they don’t have any problems related to data management.

So what stops people from implementing such an important tool? Too often, people don’t know the truth about PDM. For example, this research finds that about one quarter without PDM don’t understand PDM benefits (24%) and/or don’t know what PDM is (21%). There are other misconceptions as well. For example, some believe that companies that primarily use 2D CAD and office documents don’t benefit from PDM, which is simply not true.

There is also a lot of misinformation about who should use PDM and how hard it is to implement. While PDM can take a lot of time and money to implement, it doesn’t have to. Others believe that only larger companies can benefit from PDM, or that it is only valuable inside of engineering. Clearly there are a lot of myths to address with facts.

PDM-Implementation-Cost-Time

To get the real story and prompt a practical discussion, Tech-Clarity surveyed over 2,500 companies about their experiences managing data. It’s time for companies to stop believing the urban legends about PDM and get the facts so they can start improving their businesses. After all, the alternative is unmanaged (or manually managed) data, which is inefficient at best and risky at worse. As The Basics of Managing CAD explains, “Some recognize the shortcomings and risks of a manual (data) management approach, while others are one mistake away from learning the hard way.”

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Hello!
    Thanks for your servey!

    Could you clarify please some data of the The Facts About Managing Product Data?

    In the Evaluating Data Management Approaches section (page 8) you say that “The data shows that Top
    Performers are 37% more likely to use PDM” but if am not mistaken according to the grapth the percent is 11.

    Top perfomance is 41% – Others 30% = 11.

    do you comment, please.

    Best regards,
    Pavel

  2. Pavel,
    Thank you for your reading the report. The percentages can be confusing. The key is that we are comparing the percentages to each other, not comparing the numbers absolutely.

    Here is a straightforward example:

    John picks red candy 10% of the time.
    Amy picks red candy 20% of the time.

    How much more likely is Amy to pick red candy than John? The answer is not 20% – 10% = 10%. That actually answers a different question. How much more often does Amy pick red candy.

    The answer is that she is 100% more likely to pick red candy as John is. (20% – 10%) / 10% = 100%.
    Another way to state it is that she is twice as likely to pick red cady.

    I apologize if this seems simplistic, sometimes I find these kind of examples help set things straight in my own mind.

    When we benchmark, we try to look at the ratio / gap between what different performance bands do. For example, if 20% of Top Performers do something (like use Simulation tools) and 10% of Others do it, that leads us to believe that while not many of them do it, it appears to make a difference. On the other hand, if 90% of Top Performers do something (like use CAD) and 80% of Others do it, that is probably not as differentiating. Even though both show 10% more frequent usage, the ratio between the two is very different (twice as likely for one, and only 12.5% more likely for the other, calculated as (90% – 80%) / 80% = 12.5%).

    I think both sets of calculations are meaningful, but we try to focus on the differences between performance bands.

    I apologize if that was a long answer to a short question, I thought the explanation might be helpful for this (and other) surveys.

    Best,
    Jim

Speak Your Mind

*