';

Webinar: Addressing Bottlenecks in Simulation

Michelle Boucher will share her recent research on Simulation Bottlenecks during a webinar on Thursday September 29 at 2:00 EDT. Digital Engineering's Kenneth Wong will moderate this webinar sponsored by Siemens Femap. This webinar will reveal: The top improvement areas you should focus on to get even … [ read more ]

Bottlenecks in Simulation

Top Five Five Factors for a Successful IIoT Implementation (live webcast)

Jim Brown will present his recent research on building versus buying IIoT infrastructure in the upcoming Top 5 Factors for a Successful Industrial IoT Implementation webcast on Engineering.com (sponsored by Autodesk). The webcast also features Autodesk's Head of IoT, Bryan Kester, sharing how IIoT can help improve … [ read more ]

iot_webcast_image

Survey: Composites for A&D

Are you in the aerospace and defense industry (A&D) or a supplier for A&D? Do you work with composites? If so, please share your experience with composites by participating in this research and completing the survey. We are exploring topics such as: what is the material make-up of your parts?Are … [ read more ]

Slideshow Graphic Template.pptx-1

Composite State of the Market (Survey Findings)

Tech-Clarity's research report, Composites State of the Market: Using Composites as a Competitive Advantage, examines survey findings on material trends and composites. Over 240 companies participated in the survey. The research finds that new materials are a significant source of product complexity. The research … [ read more ]

Composites

PLM Integration Survey Invitation

How do leading companies implement, operate, and support PLM integration? What value does integration bring them? Please share your thoughts in our short PLM Integration Survey. Tech-Clarity invites you to join a research study on best practices for PLM Integration.  If you have already completed the … [ read more ]

Slideshow Graphic Template.pptx-1
1
Mythbusting PLM is an Industry Affair – Or is It?
Share

What I learned this week … was a retrospective look at an article analyzing how industry-specific PLM application are. The review was in response to a comment on my post In Search of a Common PLM Definition. I had a little bit of fun with the review, and I thought I would share it here. In fairness to Oleg, I decided to use my “mythbusting” technique that I used on him earlier in the year in Mythbusing ERP-PLM Integration.

Responses and Reactions

Need to Document and Prioritize PLM Requirements (Confirmed) – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree, so let’s confirm that as a statement that holds up today.

Inegrating PLM to Manufacturing (Plausible) – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined in engineering / R&D (and PLM) into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing (DM) and Manufacturing Process Management (MPM) – most manufacturers are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or Manufacturing Operations Management (MOM). The opportunity is still compelling, but I thought we would be further ahead. Hats off to my old friends at Sequencia for being ahead of the curve.

Product Portfolio Management in PLM (Confirmed) – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true, and is a hot topic in product innovation and product development today.

My Bio (BUSTED, big time) – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). Yikes. Busted. Definately.

So that is a brief look at some old research with the benefits of hindsight, I hope you found it interesting. Who knew? I didn’t, if you did let us know about it. I look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut please).

NOTE: I use the “mythbusting” concept out of pure admiration and respect for such a brilliant concept, that helps kids (and adults) learn about how cool engineering can be while entertaining them.

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    That’s why I used the not-so-serious Jim Brown pic in our blog interview 😉

  2. Anonymous says:

    That’s why I used the not-so-serious Jim Brown pic in our blog interview 😉

  3. dorasmith says:

    That's why I used the not-so-serious Jim Brown pic in our blog interview 😉

Speak Your Mind

*