';

Better PLM Integration Drives Better Business Performance (Webcast)

Tech-Clarity analyst Jim Brown joins Razorleaf's Director of Integrations and Development Derek Neiding to share the results of a recent study on PLM integration. The webcast will highlight the strategies, processes, and technologies Top Performers use to integrate PLM with design tools and other enterprise … [ read more ]

tech_clarity_plm_integration_webinar

Product Data Management Survey (Invitation)

How do leading companies manage product data and keep their design processes efficient? Please share your thoughts in our short Design Data Management Survey. Tech-Clarity invites you to join a research study on best practices in data management.  If you've already completed the survey  –> please … [ read more ]

New CAD Survey Invite

New CAD Survey (Invitation)

Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned  in this new CAD survey. Have you migrated from 2D to 3D? Switched from one 3D CAD tool for another? Have you considered getting even more from your 3D models with model based design? Or have you stuck with the same approach? Do you work with … [ read more ]

New CAD Survey Invite

NPDI Survey (Invitation)

How do leading companies develop and launch successful new products? Please share your thoughts in our short New Product Development and Introduction Survey. Tech-Clarity invites you to join a research study on best practices in NPDI.  If you've already completed the survey  –> please share with a … [ read more ]

New CAD Survey Invite

Successful Products Start and End with Your Customer (infographic)

Tech-Clarity's Infographic, Successful Products Start and End with Your Customer  provides guidance to CPG companies. By embedding your customer in the middle of your product life cycle, your products will be more successful. The infographic, shows that by capturing insights obtained during the shopping … [ read more ]

CPG Successful Products
1

Software Intensive Product Survey says More Software in Products means More Problems

Share

A quick peek into some research on how manufacturers can achieve the positive business benefits of software-intensive products without suffering the common, negative challenges and business impacts resulting from increased product development complexity. The report, Tech-Clarity Perspective: Developing Software-Intensive Product: Addressing the Innovation-Complexity Conundrum, highlights the results of a survey of over 100 manufacturers to help companies address this conundrum. The survey results are clear – companies are not backing away from the trend of putting more software in their products – so designers have to address the challenge or suffer poor quality, inefficiency, and other drains on profitability. In addition, the report shares the perspectives of tier 1 automotive supplier Continental and in-car location and navigation provider TomTom on how they address the complexity of developing software.

Note: See press release from PTC announcing the report here, along with a link to download the report from their site

The Research Findings

Where should I start? This is a very rich report, and definitely worth a read. Let me summarize by sharing some of the most common benefits and negative impacts companies experience when developing software-intensive products. The benefits were relatively well covered in the post and underlying paper Mechatronics: Driving Product Innovation with Embedded Software, although this report gives more detail. A quick summary of the benefits includes top-line drivers like improving product capabilities, “smarter” and more innovative products, and tailoring products to customers or markets. But software also drives complexity that leads to challenges (detailed in the report) and significant, negative business impacts quality issues, time to market delays, waste from rework, high product development costs and poor software development efficiency (see Figure). Notice that the percentages add up to well over 100%, meaning that companies are experiencing combinations of these issues that erode the profitability benefits of software-intensive products.

So what can be one about this? I wouldn’t be doing my job if I didn’t point out what can be done to combat the complexity and take advantage of the benefits. Analyzing the organizational, business process, and technology enablers in place at responding companies and comparing it to the negative impacts they encounter leads to some interesting conclusions. In specific, data shows that companies with the following characteristics reported fewer significant, negative impacts when engineering products that include electrical, mechanical, and software components:

  • Unified or integrated teams for electrical, mechanical, software engineering
  • Use of systems modeling
  • Unified or integrated solutions for designing software-intensive products
  • Use of formal data / lifecycle management solutions (ALM and/or PLM)

Implications for Manufacturers

The survey results show a clear trend over the last five years and into the next five – software will continue to play a growing role in today’s (and tomorrow’s) products. The report asked four different perspectives on the trend of software in products, sometimes called “embedded software” although frequently it is not embedded on chips as the term originally implied. The survey results clearly show that, as the report states: “The majority of companies significantly increased the amount of software, the importance of software, and the innovation driven by software in their products over the last five years – and plan to increase these further over the next five years.” Responding manufacturers also increased the ratio of software engineers to other engineers and plan to continue that trend. In fact, André Radon, VP IT Competence Center Engineering Applications for Continental explains in the report that “We are actually a software company. The majority of our engineers are software engineers.”

What does all this mean? The stakes are high in terms of the benefits available and the potential negative impacts. As Tech-Clarity’s earlier report, Issue in Focus: Systems and Software Driven Innovation: Complexity and Opportunity in the Mechatronic Era, concludes, “Software driven innovation is the new frontier of competition, helping companies drive more rapid innovation and creating opportunity due to the increased flexibility and agility of software-based products.” The survey results support that conclusion, making addressing this conundrum a top priority for future competitiveness.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on developing software-intensive products, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective. Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

Speak Your Mind

*