Tech-Clarity

Making the value of technology clear

  • Published Research
    • eBooks
    • White Papers
    • Survey Results
    • Buyer’s Guides
    • Infographics
  • Research Invitations
    • Survey Invitations
    • Assessments
  • Presentations & Videos
    • Webinars
    • Live Presentations
    • Tech-Clarity TV
    • Virtual Events
  • Insights & Activity
    • In the News
    • Insights
    • Expert Interviews
  • About
    • Team Tech-Clarity
    • Jim Brown
    • Michelle Boucher
    • Julie Fraser
    • Rick Franzosa
    • Howie Markson
    • Arvind Krishnan
  • Search
  • Search
  • Date

Engineering Software Market Research Results from COFES 2010

Jim Brown - May 5, 2010

Share

A quick peek into some research on … the market for CAD, CAE, PLM, and other engineering software for 2010. 2009 was a very difficult year, no surprise. But what does 2010 look like? When will the market recover to pre-recession levels? Those are the questions we asked in a research study conducted between Tech-Clarity (me), Cyon Research, and Design Insight. Here is a synopsis of the research I presented at COFES in April.

Note: Please understand that I am not a financial analyst, and that this research is based on survey data that indicates the sentiment and beliefs of those buying, selling, and otherwise participating in the engineering software market. In other words, there is no financial investment advice here.

The Research Findings – History

The results from the 2009 engineering software market study were difficult to look at. Unfortunately, they were a pretty good reflection of the situation. Most people felt that it would be at least 2-3 years before the market recovered. More telling, however, was that the execs at the companies that buy the software said the recovery were more pessimistic than the execs at the companies the sell the software. That was a disturbing finding. We also discussed the implications for smaller vendors (specialty vendors and startups) and the projection was not pretty. So what really happened? And how do companies in the engineering software market feel today?

The Research Findings – View in 2010

The market is clearly recovering. While last year I had to start with a quote from Dilbert to lighten everybody up, this year I quotes Fed Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke saying the economy started growing again in the 3rd quarter of 2009, and the economy was finally starting to create jobs. There was no surprise or sigh of relief in the room, everybody already knew this. Since that time, Dassault Systemes, PTC, and Siemens PLM have reported good news (quarterly results and/or big deals) compared to last year (among others).  My FABWA (financial analysis by walking around) at the conference told me that smaller companies are feeling the recovery as well. People are buying engineering software again (please insert a choir of angels here).

What did the over 400 survey participants have to say? Here are the highlights:

  • The predictions from last year for 2010 were relatively accurate, 59% of of respondents said their business suffered “severe” or “moderate” negative impact in 2009 (compared to a prediction of 55%) – Mythbuster approved!
  • The projections for 2010 are better, but don’t indicate we are out of the woods yet. 23% still expect moderate negative impact in 2010. But only 8% predict severe negative impact, and 20% expect a positive impact. We’ll take that over 2009 for sure!
  • The channels including VARs (value added resellers) and consultants were hurt the most. Over 1/2 experienced severe negative impact. This was worse than predicted, even though the expectations were not very positive.
  • Suite vendors including those with multiple engineering software solutions, enterprise software vendors (like SAP and Oracle), and infrastructure providers (like Microsoft) faired the best. Only 20% experienced severe negative impact.
  • The channels are the least optimistic for a positive impact in 2010 (only 9%), while the suite vendors are the most optimistic (36%)
  • Our predictions for smaller vendors were mixed, with larger vendors expecting more failures in their smaller competitors. While it was a tough year, the majority of the companies respondents had direct experience with fell into the “struggle but survive” category. The smaller vendors predicted this, and good for them. Of course there have been consolidations and failures, and as one participant commented “100% of the startups I was following failed to start“

So the obvious question is what comes next? Well, for  me it as another cup of coffee and a decision that this post is getting too long. So look for a part 2 with the future view shortly.

Implications for Manufacturers

So what does this all mean to the people using engineering software to make a living? The good news is that your business is likely recovering as well. The bad news, is that you are probably running very lean. But from this research (and related research by Cyon Research presented by Brad Holtz) you are also likely to be buying engineering software to help. I am sure that is good news to many that have had strategic programs put on hold due to economic uncertainty. Things are starting to move forward again.

And hopefully your critical vendors either survived the downturn or were acquired by a company that will support you well. The vendor shakeout is probably not entirely over, but if your vendor made it through 2009 they have proven they have some resilience and should have a much easier time going forward.

So that was a quick peek into some recent research on the engineering software market, I hope you found it interesting. Does the research reflect your experiences? Do you see it differently? Let us know what it looks like from your perspective. Please feel free to review more free research and white papers about PLM and other enterprise software for manufacturers from Tech-Clarity.

Related Posts

  • Embracing Cloud Engineering Software and Data (webcast)
    Cloud Engineering Software

    How ready are manufacturers and AEC companies to embrace the cloud in engineering? AMC Bridge's…

  • Improving Performance Engineering (webcast)
    Performance Engineering Maturity

    Heavy equipment is becoming more connected, autonomous, smart, and electrified. Given the increased complexity, how…

  • Modernizing Manufacturing Engineering (survey invitation)
    Supply chain resilience

    How are leading companies modernizing manufacturing engineering? Tech-Clarity is conducting a research study on the…

Filed Under: Research Rap Tagged With: Consultants, Market Research, VAR, PLM, CAD, Engineering Software, CAE, Vendor, Forecast, Channels

Comments

  1. Anonymous says

    November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  2. Anonymous says

    November 30, -0001 at 12:00 am

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  3. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 10:38 am

    Great post, Jim.

    For the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.

    Mark

    • jim_techclarity says

      May 5, 2010 at 10:52 am

      Great question Mark.

      The 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.

      The 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.

      The 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.

      Thanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!

      Best,
      Jim

  4. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  5. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  6. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  7. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  8. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  9. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  10. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  11. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  12. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  13. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  14. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  15. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  16. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  17. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  18. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  19. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  20. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  21. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  22. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  23. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  24. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  25. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  26. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  27. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  28. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  29. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  30. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  31. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  32. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    Great post, Jim.nnFor the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn’t quite clear how/when the data was collected.nnMark

  33. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  34. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  35. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  36. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  37. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  38. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  39. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  40. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  41. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  42. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  43. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  44. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  45. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  46. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  47. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  48. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  49. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  50. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  51. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  52. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  53. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  54. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  55. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  56. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  57. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  58. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  59. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  60. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  61. jim_techclarity says

    May 5, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Great question Mark.rnrnThe 2009 (projected) data came from last year’s survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.rnrnThe 2009 (actual) data came from this year’s survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.rnrnThe 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.rnrnThanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!rnrnBest,rnJim

  62. burhop says

    May 5, 2010 at 11:38 am

    Great post, Jim.

    For the first image, was this from two different surveys, one before 2009 and one after? I wasn't quite clear how/when the data was collected.

    Mark

    • jim_techclarity says

      May 5, 2010 at 11:52 am

      Great question Mark.

      The 2009 (projected) data came from last year's survey. It represents what companies last year believed the impact of the economy would be on their business.

      The 2009 (actual) data came from this year's survey. The data was gathered in March, 2010. It reflects what actually happened to their business last year.

      The 2010 (projected) is asking what companies today believe the impact will be on this calendar year.

      Thanks for the opportunity to explain, you are probably not the only one that will have that question!

      Best,
      Jim

Trackbacks

  1. The Future of Engineering Software - Strategies for 2010+ | Clarity on PLM says:
    May 11, 2010 at 10:51 am

    […] and other engineering software in 2010. Last week I posted the first part of my research for COFES, Engineering Market Research Results from COFES 2010. Last week I reviewed how 2009 predictions played out and what the survey participants expect from […]

Join our community to receive our newsletter and survey invitations.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Copyright © 2012-2025 – Tech-Clarity, Inc.

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Date

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Copyright © 2012-2025 – Tech-Clarity, Inc.

Receive our Latest Research

Subscribe to Tech-Clarity to be notified about new research results and survey opportunities.

Join our community to receive our newsletter and survey invitations.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.