• Dassault Systèmes continues to make significant progress on the 3DExperience vision they laid out 5 years ago. This strategy has seen them transform from a software vendor offering distinct solutions for a variety of functional areas to a company that leads with a strong business transformation message backed up by a platform of solutions. I dropped "PLM" from the title of last year's strategy review. I feel even better about that decision a year later. They now have a broad software suite brought to market as solutions tailored to support key initiatives in the vertical industries they serve. As times goes … [ read more ]

    Dassault Systèmes Strategy 2017+
  • The Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies ebook explains how smaller companies in the high technology industry find themselves stuck between full-featured Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems that feel out of reach and less capable solutions including cloud-based file sharing or very basic data management applications. They know they can’t afford the errors and inefficiency inherent to informal data and process management, but can’t afford a large time, resource, and financial investment to fix their problems. Unfortunately simple solutions like web file sharing, while very attractive, fall … [ read more ]

    Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies
  • The How-to Guide to Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD  shares best practices for moving from 2D to 3D. The guide shares the reasons you should consider going from 2D to 3D, common challenges to avoid, and benefits enjoyed by other companies who gone to 3D. The guide then shares advice to make your switch from 2D to 3D CAD a success. The recommendations were developed by analyzing the responses of Top Performing companies and comparing them to Average Performing companies.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting … [ read more ]

    Best Practices for Going from 2D to 3D CAD
  • The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration … [ read more ]

    Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)
  • What type of experiences prepare engineering students the best for "real world" industry work? What should new graduates know when they start their first job?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on the engineering skills gap. We are exploring questions such as, what types of things do you look for in a new graduate? How can engineering colleges and universities improve their curriculum to better prepare students for today's modern products?  What concerns do you have about the future engineering workforce?Developing the future workforce is critical to the … [ read more ]

    What Skills Do You Wish Engineering Graduates Had? (Survey Invite)

Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)

Share

The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.

Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration required).

For the full report, please visit our sponsor Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA (free of charge, registration required).

Executive Overview

Quality management is critical to the success and profitability of a Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) company. According to Tech-Clarity research, Successful Products Begin and End with the Customer, over three-quarters of CPG Companies say higher quality is required to drive competitive differentiation. It’s also clearly important to deliver customer satisfaction, safety, regulatory compliance, corporate responsibility, and overall company profitability.

To better understand how they address this crucial need, we surveyed over 175 CPG companies and examined their quality management challenges, processes, organizational structure, technology use, and performance. We found that these businesses face significant quality management issues. We also discovered that they’re taking action. Specifically, about two-thirds of CPG companies are going beyond what’s currently required by adopting formal quality management processes and systems such as those used in the pharmaceutical and life sciences industry.

A key finding of the study is that while companies are able to avoid significant negative quality impacts relatively well, many suffer from excessive internal costs related to quality challenges. Based on these findings, we believe that CPG companies are mitigating quality risk through “brute force” quality management that adds significant operational cost. Top Performers, however, achieve better quality results at lower cost. How do they do this? The survey shows that they take different approaches to managing quality. Specifically, they are more likely to:

  • Take a more integrated approach to quality along geographic, organizational, and product lifecycle dimensions
  • Adopt a more digital approach to managing quality, relying less solely on paper and isolated electronic documents
  • Enable quality management with more automation and advanced technology, including automated data collection, analytics, and product documentation automation
  • Use more integrated solutions to manage quality and pursue a platform approach to quality solutions

Top Performers are able to simultaneously improve quality and maintain cost of quality. Others can learn from them to reduce errors, rework, and adverse events without incurring excess internal cost.

Table of Contents

  • Executive Overview
  • The Quality Imperative
  • Managing Quality Carries Enterprise-Level Challenges
  • Quality and Mistakes Avoided with Brute Force
  • What Sets Apart Top Performers in Quality?
  • Top Performers Take a More Integrated Approach to Quality
  • Top Performers Extend Data and Processes to More Functions
  • Top Performers Use More Automation, Advanced Technology
  • Top Performers Enable Quality Digitally
  • Top Performers Enable Quality with a Platform Approach
  • Conclusion
  • Recommendations
  • About the Author
  • About the Research
  • About the Sponsor

Conclusion

Quality Management is crucial for CPG companies, but they face significant challenges. Although CPG companies report they are relatively effective at preventing significant issues, they face excess Quality Management related costs.

Top Performers, on the other hand, are able to achieve better quality results from both quality and cost perspectives. They appear to have broken out of the paradigm of “better quality or lower cost, choose one.” They do this by taking a more holistic approach to quality, using more advanced tools like analytics, and leveraging more automation.

Beyond the individual tools they use to manage quality, Top Performers take a much more integrated approach to organization, processes, and systems. They are more likely to have integrated data and processes, integrated systems, and pursue a platform approach for Quality Management. Our conclusion is that an integrated, digital approach to Quality Management in the CPG industry drives better business results from both quality and cost perspectives.

Recommendations

Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:

  • Take a holistic view and approach to quality
  • Move away from brute force Quality Management practices
  • Adopt automation for more current, trusted data
  • Adopt advanced tools like analytics to improve quality
  • Move to a digital approach
  • Integrate quality systems
  • Leverage a platform of solutions to enable more holistic, integrated quality to improve quality without increasing cost, or reduce cost and maintain quality

 

Speak Your Mind

*