• The Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies ebook explains how smaller companies in the high technology industry find themselves stuck between full-featured Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems that feel out of reach and less capable solutions including cloud-based file sharing or very basic data management applications. They know they can’t afford the errors and inefficiency inherent to informal data and process management, but can’t afford a large time, resource, and financial investment to fix their problems. Unfortunately simple solutions like web file sharing, while very attractive, fall … [ read more ]

    Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies
  • The How-to Guide to Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD  shares best practices for moving from 2D to 3D. The guide shares the reasons you should consider going from 2D to 3D, common challenges to avoid, and benefits enjoyed by other companies who gone to 3D. The guide then shares advice to make your switch from 2D to 3D CAD a success. The recommendations were developed by analyzing the responses of Top Performing companies and comparing them to Average Performing companies.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting … [ read more ]

    Best Practices for Going from 2D to 3D CAD
  • The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration … [ read more ]

    Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)
  • What type of experiences prepare engineering students the best for "real world" industry work? What should new graduates know when they start their first job?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on the engineering skills gap. We are exploring questions such as, what types of things do you look for in a new graduate? How can engineering colleges and universities improve their curriculum to better prepare students for today's modern products?  What concerns do you have about the future engineering workforce?Developing the future workforce is critical to the … [ read more ]

    What Skills Do You Wish Engineering Graduates Had? (Survey Invite)
  • This infographic shares the importance of developing a cohesive digital thread when developing formulated products in the consumer packaged goods industry. The digital thread should be driven by customer requirements and incorporate the recipe / formulation, specifications, packaging design, compliance information, claims, cautions, ingredients, labeling, artwork, and more to provide a full view of the product and it's design history. An effective CPG Digital Thread relies on an integrated Product Innovation Platform to connect product data from early in the front end of innovation through development, … [ read more ]

    The CPG Digital Thread (infographic)

Dassault Systemes’ 3DExperience Forum was an Experience!


I spoke with Dassault Systemes‘ execs and their customers earlier this week about everything from business strategies, the state of the manufacturing industry, and PLM market dynamics to implementation experiences at the first 3DEXPERIENCE Forum. I am fortunate to have been invited to hear firsthand two highly important aspects of a software vendor’s future:

  • The vendor’s strategy to understand how they plan to succeed in the market
  • Their customers’ perspective to judge how they are doing with their current installed base

Talking Strategy

The first thing to know is that Dassault is transitioning from “PLM” to “3DExperience.” There was a lot of discussion about how the evolution of product innovation leads to product experiences. The point is that the customer’s appreciation and value perceived from a product includes more than the physical product. In fact, we heard a great keynote from Joe Pine who authored The Experience Economy. He gave great examples that aligned remarkably well with Dassault’s strategy. My favorite example was a gumball machine with the long spiral, where the product is really entertainment as much as (or more than) the candy. He also discussed how this applied to companies like REI and Tesla Motors, who we heard from later in the session (along with Oracle Team USA). My favorite quote is below:

DS explained how their evolution has a company has taken them through transitions including 3D Design -> 3D-DMU -> 3D-PLM -> 3DEXPERIENCE. What is clear about the strategy is that Dassault Systemes is expanding the definition of PLM beyond PLM. They are now addressing new capabilities outside of the core PLM suite to provide more value to customers and open up new markets. Their PLM suite is becoming a “3DExperience Platform.” Clearly there is a lot of marketing going on, but there is real strategy behind it. DS is going bigger than PLM. It’s interesting to note that during this process that in addition the always charismatic CEO Bernard Charles we heard quite a bit from the fiery Monica Menghini, who was clearly instrumental in defining the “3DExperience” strategy.

You will hear the new term floating “3D Experiences” around a lot from Dassault. Actually their are two more terms you may hear,  “Social Industry Experiences” and “Engineered Business Experiences” but I  took away that they are effectively different names for the same thing. Dassault teams are looking at specific business processes across their product lines (or “Brands” as DS likes to call them) to focus on what their customers in specific vertical markets need to do in order to get a job done. The best definition I heard came via twitter from Monica Schnitger quoting DS VP Stéphane Declée:

The key thing to understand is that “experiences” are processes that span products and are tuned to solve specific, strategic business challenges in targeted vertical industries. The first demonstrated was “Winning Program” for the aerospace industry. This included new and existing software capabilities. The next day we saw “High Touch Body & Soul” experience for the high-tech/electronics industry. This appeared to be more of a demonstration of how existing DS tools can be applied in a compelling way to get a new consumer electronics product to the market rapidly. This cross-brand thinking targeted toward specific industry issues will add a lot of value to companies facing these challenges.

Talking to Customers

To be honest, a solid majority of customers don’t listen to strategies like this and don’t care. It’s sad, but true. Perhaps for their jobs it’s also practical. All they want to know is how it impacts them. They listen to hear if any of the products they know and love are being replaced or discontinued. It reminds me a lot of the Far Side (thanks for years of laughs Scott Larson, you are a genious) about what we say to dogs and what they hear. Very selective, to say the least. (I resisted pasting Bernard’s picture on the cartoon, I don’t think he would appreciate it). Others recognize that the health of their software suite provider plays a big role in the success of their own business. Your fate is tied to the fate of your enterprise software suppliers. That being said, many of the people that attended didn’t have much of an opinion on the “Experiences” ideas. There were exceptions, but for now let’s focus on what matters to most customers – products.

But What about Products?

So what about products? There were countless sessions discussing the future of Enovia, Catia, Delmia, Simulia, , 3DSwym, 3DVIA, Netvibes, SolidWorks and more. I was particularly interested in the presentations on systems engineering and co-simulation that really showed Dassault is investing in the things their customers are struggling with, maybe even before most customers are ready to adopt the solution.There is far too much for me to have heard at the event, and too much to share here.

A Final Note: DS Losing Focus on PLM? (Not)

I have heard some noise from people about Dassault moving into new markets and losing their focus on PLM. It is true that Dassault is looking beyond the current PLM market for growth. They are not doing this instead of focusing on PLM, they are doing it in addition to focusing on PLM. DS is broadening their portfolio to new markets (they acquired the leading software company in the mining industry, Gemcom) and added new capabilities that existing customers can use beyond PLM (they also acquired Netvibes). I suspect that those that recognize that the long-term health of their software vendor is an important thing for their own business applaud these moves. They are adjacent, non-competing products. So please look for new product information coming from DS, I don’t think you will see them losing focus on the PLM market. In the press conference lunch Bernard even told us he still expects the “PLM” term to go forward as the market standard.

So that’s what I hear from Bernard Charlès and the Dassault Systemes team, I hope you found it useful. What do you think? What else should I have asked them?

NOTE: Corrected “Perfect Program” to “Winning Program” and “Social Business Experience” to “Social Industry Experience”


  1. Saw 3DS in Stuttgart recently and going to the European 3D Experience in a week.

    This “experience” idea looks like a moniker to label the underlying platform that will tie together their applications and make integration of “everything” you want to do easier.

    The “experience part is forward looking in a way since combining design, visualization, and simulation can lead to creating “3D Experiences”. 3DS also wants to take this concept to the broader public – not sure if that will work, but they are going to try.

    I agree with this the conclusion about focus. The product teams will stay focused on the products, customers and their needs. The platform will be the way they dish it up to the client.

    • Thanks Tom, well stated. I agree that “experience” is a platform. They are also defining “experiences” on top of them. The term means different things in different places, perhaps. But the idea that design, visualization, and simulation help define product (experience) offerings is probably the clearest next step to extend existing PLM capabilities. Thanks for sharing your experience with experience. 🙂

      • Hey, it is a French company after all – they will have a unique perspective / nomenclature. But to their credit, they recognized the convergence of interactive simulation & visualization and how that relates to design and engineering. Investigating how a design behaves – i.e. simulating and visualizing it, is an “experience”.

        The possibility to do this in the future was apparent some time ago to people working on the computing and graphics side of the equation. But it takes the base application to pull it all together and make that a reality.

        At the moment, CATIA Live Rendering really puts interactive visualization on the designer’s desktop. If Dassault successfully links the interactive simulated behavior of the design to CATIA Live Rendering in this new platform, then they’ll be starting to cross the line into experience.

  2. Jim: good summary of the concepts of where DS seems to be heading. The company is a master at painting a picture far beyond where that are today. Hear anything specific about SolidWorks and its direction?

    • Ray,
      SolidsWorks wasn’t specifically called out in much of the keynote and “experience” discussion, but was clearly mentioned as continuing to be strategic to DS. They did mention standardization of platforms and interoperability – SW was mentioned there. I think they save a lot of the SW information for SolidWorks World.
      All the best,

  3. I agree with Raymond about the DS picture far beyond. Must DS listen to their customer experiences or customers listen to DS e?. In my opinion DS must be present in any customer and be part Active in our Value Chain. Then we will can share the DS point of view . Would change DS the sales bussiness experience?

    thanks Jim.


Speak Your Mind