• Jim Brown joins Autodesk's Michael Vesperman during this Engineering Live panel discussion moderated by Janine Mooney, Editor in Chief at Advantage Business Media. Jim and Michael share insights from recent survey results and customer experience in an interactive discussion on NPDI.  They share NPD best practices and technology including 7 things that Top Performers in NPDI do differently than the rest. Register for the May 17 event now! … [ read more ]

    Beating the Competition with New Product Development and Introduction (webcast)
  • On Thursday, April 27 at 2:00 EDT, Michelle Boucher will share tips to improve the efficiency of simulation preprocessing.  During this webinar,  Shawn Wasserman, simulation editor at ENGINEERING.com, will join Michelle. This webinar will reveal: The top improvement areas you should focus on to get even more value from simulation Common challenges during the preprocessing phase Best practices to overcome those preprocessing challenges Case studies demonstrating the benefits of efficient preprocessing   Register for this live event.   … [ read more ]

    Webinar: Solving the Bottlenecks of Simulation Preprocessing
  • The Design Data Management Maturity Improves Profitability, Analyzing Best Practices for Managing Designs report shares fresh survey data and interviews. It updates our design data management research to cover new trends like using cloud file sharing applications to manage data. It also drills down on the topics of complexity and non-value added time spent managing design data, and shares metrics on the business improvements available from design data management best practices and technologies. Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report or title to download the full PDF (free of charge, no … [ read more ]

    Design Data Management Maturity Improves Profitability (survey report)
  • How should you improve access to service and parts information? Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned  in this new survey on managing product service and parts information. The survey explores ways to streamline parts information for service technicians and the associated benefits. We will explore questions such as: What are the biggest challenges you should focus on to improve the efficiency of service visits? What type of information would service technicians find most useful ? How can you improve the accuracy of service manuals? We would like to learn what you find hard and … [ read more ]

    Managing Product Service and Parts Information (Survey Invitation)
  • Tech-Clarity's Medical Devices Manufacturers Software Selection Guide helps manufacturers identify the right buying criteria for software solutions to support developing, producing, and servicing medical devices. This buyer's guide also takes into account unique needs for medical device companies including regulatory compliance and support for the FDA's Case for Quality. Tech-Clarity’s Buyer’s Guides go beyond software functionality to provide a framework of requirements that impact implementation success and long-term ROI, including: Software capabilities Implementation User adoption … [ read more ]

    Medical Devices Manufacturers Software Selection Guide

Tech-Clarity TV – CAD-PLM Integration

Share

This episode of Tech-Clarity TV  looks at the future of product design software (CAD) and product development environments (PLM) and how they should work together. The video is based on our Integrating Product Design and Development report that shares how a well-integrated CAD-PLM continuum helps improve engineering and product development performance.

Please see our sponsor Dassault Systemes for more information on this topic and a discussion of how their products meet these needs (free of charge, registration required).

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. Hi Jim, I posted some text earlier today but it disappeared into the ether when I tried to post it to this discussion…if you have a copy at your end please feel free to add it to the conversation. Allan

    • Allan,
      I don’t see it on my end, sorry. Thanks for sharing your views, if you have time to try again I would appreciate it. Before you hit post please copy it and if it doesn’t go through shoot it to me in an email. So sorry it didn’t work, not sure what might have happened.
      Best,
      Jim

  2. Hi Jim, interesting points.

    You speak about the future of engineering design in context and in real time (multiple users). Firstly, it’s only fair to note that CoCreate (now PTC) had this facility back in the days, and ImpactXoft had similar, albeit via totally different mechanisms…and these products were available in the 90s. The challenge with simultaneous engineering (let’s call it that shall we?) is that one can’t count on synchronicity being the answer at all times. Life’s not that simple unfortunately. I suggest that changing behavior (the people) and company workflows will be among the largest obstacles to achieving your vision, not necessarily the technologies in use.

    (FYI…Gian Paulo Bassi, CTO of Dassault’s SolidWorks was one of the team at ImpactXoft. Bot Autodesk and Dassault acquired the use of code and patents in the mid nougties and I’m sure there will be parts of their legacy somewhere in Inventor and CATIA and/or other products…. From a conceptual point of view ImpactXoft allowed for both synchronous and asynchronous design collaboration with obfuscation where necessary to protect IP. A really interesting proposition, but one that unfortunately didn’t make the muster.)

    Of course the true nature of the beast is (in many cases) multi-domain; with software, electronics, hydraulics and pneumatics as/where appropriate. That means that a true in-context view of the ‘system’ will need to be one that is conducted within the product in it’s complete (maybe even in-use) instance. For the avoidance of doubt, I do believe that this is (probably) feasible, but not yet practical (and/or elegant). Standards will be a key enabler in making this all happen. No one company has the appetite or competence to deliver all that users will need to make this happen, and customers are much more wary these days of vendors who harbor proprietary ambitions. If your readers are interested, have a look at the FMI (Functional Mock-up Interface) initiative. This or it’s evolution will most likely be one of the enablers that helps move the (multi-domain) industry forward. https://www.fmi-standard.org/

    My two penneth worth is… what we think of now as ‘state of the art’ (I’ve so wanted to use that old phrase again!) in CAD/CAM/PLM will indeed morph, and the vision you mention will be a party to this…but bigger changes are afoot!

    Thoughts on a post card please 🙂

Speak Your Mind

*