What I learned this week … was that we could use a good, common PLM definition and scope, but we will not get one.
The discussion (a lot of discussion in multiple forums, actually) came from my post SAP, Too Much or Too Little Credit for PLM Efforts and another called Who Will Disrupt Entrenched PLM Vendors? Chris Williams pointed out on a LinkedIn thread that he felt maybe the confusion was due to a lack of understanding of what PLM really is, and asked for a common definition. My response? Not so much.
A Not-so-Common Defintion
Chris asked the million dollar question. But PLM is not one thing. While ERP has matured to a more common footprint across the vendors, the scope of PLM from each of the vendors differs. I define PLM as “processes and software used to improve product innovation, product development, and engineering performance.” That is (by definition, not by fault) very broad. There is no one “PLM” definition. The vision of the vendors shows consoliation over time, but today they are very different. Siemens includes MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul) for A&D. Dassault Systemes has spent much more effort in “lifelike simulation.” PTC includes development of product documentation. Then, there are the applications that don’t come as a part of the suite, which makes each implementation different. Aras includes APQP and quality. They are all different.
Implications for Manufacturers
The lack of a common definition is also why putting in PLM without a strategy is a quagmire waiting to happen. But a common defintion won’t help. While there are standard processes in PLM, they are not as common as in ERP. There are examples of common processes, such as Stage-Gate processes for new product development (NPD) or CMII for change management. But product innovation and product development are not as standardized processes as accounting, as an example. It is not the lack of common PLM system definition at the root of this, it is the lack of common PLM processes. And as much as companies like Invention Machine are putting process orientation into innovation, it will still not be as standardized as ERP functions like human resource management.
So, manufacturers really need to think about what problems they want to solve before implementing PLM. You can’t just install the software and expect any benefits (beyond maybe simple data management). This is what I call the PLM Program, a strategy and vision for PLM that you accomplish in small, incremental steps.
So those are my thoughts on a common PLM defintion, don’t hold your breath waiting for it. I hope you found it interesting. Do you have a better one? I didn’t, if you do let us know about it.
That, by the way, is one of the reasons it is very hard for ERP to simply build another module and call it PLM. That is why SAP has a long program to develop PLM (which will be yet another variation on the PLM theme, different from the others).
Jim, thanks for the thoughtful perspective. I think you hit the nail on the head. I continue my mantra when working with firms large and small that they need to identify which problems they need to fix before engaging PLM technologies. Even then, companies seem averse to considering the L in PLM, that is, the “life-cycle”. Depending upon the mindset of internal “champions”, “life-cycle” can be anything from Engineering to Release to Manufacturing. In reality, in my opinion, “life-cycle” goes from ideation to EOL. Assuming that, then one must consider “rules” management, in addition to processes and technologies (and the human factor, of course). When ending the life of a product, there are many rules dealing with materials management, manufacturing capacity, service management, etc. that might impact processes in prior stages and gates. Just a thought.
Mike,
It sounds like you are doing your clients a great service considering the problems they need to fix, and focusing across the lifecycle.
You make an excellent point about rules. In most of the people-process-technology conversations I have been replacing “technology” with “data” But business logic can rules can fit underneath processes and software is a great way to enforce them and esnure they are applied consistently. I may need to rethink the way I think about it. Do you see rules as process, technology, or both?
Thanks for the feedback.
Jim, thanks for the thoughtful perspective. I think you hit the nail on the head. I continue my mantra when working with firms large and small that they need to identify which problems they need to fix before engaging PLM technologies. Even then, companies seem averse to considering the L in PLM, that is, the “life-cycle”. Depending upon the mindset of internal “champions”, “life-cycle” can be anything from Engineering to Release to Manufacturing. In reality, in my opinion, “life-cycle” goes from ideation to EOL. Assuming that, then one must consider “rules” management, in addition to processes and technologies (and the human factor, of course). When ending the life of a product, there are many rules dealing with materials management, manufacturing capacity, service management, etc. that might impact processes in prior stages and gates. Just a thought.
Mike,
It sounds like you are doing your clients a great service considering the problems they need to fix, and focusing across the lifecycle.
You make an excellent point about rules. In most of the people-process-technology conversations I have been replacing “technology” with “data” But business logic can rules can fit underneath processes and software is a great way to enforce them and esnure they are applied consistently. I may need to rethink the way I think about it. Do you see rules as process, technology, or both?
Thanks for the feedback.
Yes, finally this is one of pretty clear blog regards PLM and I absolutely agree that there is NO ONE PLM Definition. IMHO, good news for all PLM vendors as today whatever is called PLM product :-).
PLM is not tool even it’s not platform or software it’s more the startegy in product design&innovation process and it depends what kind of business we want to address. It will be different for automotive, Food&Beverage or EHT (just to mention a few of them) and even the data model is different. Of course there are the rules which are common like “good” Data Management or Concurrent Engineering.
Also another view on PLM is whether company has R&D department or not then PLM customer will put the stress on different parts of PLM mosaic and again this is just example.
Sometimes I’m puzzled by reading some blogs where is put in contrast CAD vs PLM or PDM vs PLM and hereat both are integral part of PLM.
Thereby I’m not saying that any tool without CAD or PDM is not PLM related but for me it’s hardly to accept this confront.
vlna,
Thank you for your comment. Your post reminded me of an article I wrote a long time ago titled “PLM is an Industry Affair, or Is it?” http://tech-clarity.com/documents/PLM_Is_An_Industry_Affair.pdf
The point was that many part of PLM are highly dependent on industry, while there are also more general areas. Your response caused me to want to go back and read it. That is on my “to do” list. I wonder what your thoughts are?
Jim
Best,
Jim
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:
1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.
2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).
3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.
4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut).
I look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
Jim,
1- yes, I agree
2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult task
3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed
4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you mean
Vladimir
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Jim,
Thank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.
In detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.
Also I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.
And at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Vladimir,
Excellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.
I formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!
http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/
Jim
Jim,
OK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt 🙂
Thanks
Vladimir
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
Yes, finally this is one of pretty clear blog regards PLM and I absolutely agree that there is NO ONE PLM Definition. IMHO, good news for all PLM vendors as today whatever is called PLM product :-).
PLM is not tool even it's not platform or software it's more the startegy in product design&innovation process and it depends what kind of business we want to address. It will be different for automotive, Food&Beverage or EHT (just to mention a few of them) and even the data model is different. Of course there are the rules which are common like “good” Data Management or Concurrent Engineering.
Also another view on PLM is whether company has R&D department or not then PLM customer will put the stress on different parts of PLM mosaic and again this is just example.
Sometimes I'm puzzled by reading some blogs where is put in contrast CAD vs PLM or PDM vs PLM and hereat both are integral part of PLM.
Thereby I'm not saying that any tool without CAD or PDM is not PLM related but for me it's hardly to accept this confront.
vlna,
Thank you for your comment. Your post reminded me of an article I wrote a long time ago titled “PLM is an Industry Affair, or Is it?” http://tech-clarity.com/documents/PLM_Is_An_Ind…
The point was that many part of PLM are highly dependent on industry, while there are also more general areas. Your response caused me to want to go back and read it. That is on my “to do” list. I wonder what your thoughts are?
Jim
Best,
Jim
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:
1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.
2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren't as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn't come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).
3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.
4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut).
I look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
Jim,
1- yes, I agree
2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult task
3- I think I've answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed
4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you mean
Vladimir
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Jim,
Thank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it's still very valid what's in this article.
In detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.
Also I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.
And at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it's not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.
Best Regards,
Vladimir
Vladimir,
Excellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don't 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.
I formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn't revisited that article for over five year!
http://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-i…
Jim
Jim,
OK, I understand but then it's pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It's fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don't put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt 🙂
Thanks
Vladimir
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it's also PLM 🙂 I'm kidding
vlna,rnThank you for your comment. Your post reminded me of an article I wrote a long time ago titled “PLM is an Industry Affair, or Is it?” http://tech-clarity.com/documents/PLM_Is_An_Industry_Affair.pdfrnrnThe point was that many part of PLM are highly dependent on industry, while there are also more general areas. Your response caused me to want to go back and read it. That is on my “to do” list. I wonder what your thoughts are?rnrnJimrnrnBest,rnJim
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
OK, I had the chance to review my article, and here are a few reactions:rnrn1 – I start by saying companies should document and prioritize requirements. I believe that holds as true today as ever. And I think that you might agree based on your comment.rn2 – I use “technology transfer” as an example of a very industry-specific part of PLM. For those that aren’t as familiar with the term, it is effectively translating the product as defined into PLM into a product that can be produced, up to and including instructions for automated plant equipment. This is an area that really hasn’t come to be in most PLM solutions. The example holds trues as industry specific, but despite efforts in Digital Manufacturing and Manufacturing Process Management – we are still not yet integrating PLM to plant solutions like Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) or MOM (Manufacturing Operations Management).rn3 – I use Product Portfolio Management as an example for a general solution. I think this one still stands true.rn4 – Most importantly, what was I thinking with that bio picture? I think I thought it made me look like a serious analyst. Instead, I just look like I have a stomach ache (and seriously need a haircut). rnrnI look forward to additional commentary (although not on the picture, the glasses, or the haircut)
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
If PLM does not include CAD, what do we call it? CPC?
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Jim,rnThank you for the link. Definitely, I share the ideas in your article. I think, in generally, it’s still very valid what’s in this article.rnIn detail I would be even more strict on answering your basic question in exordium of article and prefer the first answer i.e definite “Yes”.rnAlso I agree that there are some common areas like mentioned PPM (Product Portfolio Mngmt) but IMHO first you need to have impemented solid object mngmt framework or Data Mngmt if you like and then you can start to think of implementation these additional functionalities.rnAnd at last I like this @fatal flaws” mention and I would say it’s not only industry specific but also by way (process) how company does the business in terms of supply chain, product configuration etc.rnBest Regards,rnVladimir
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Vladimir,rnExcellent point about processes versus industries. I would absolutely agree. I don’t 100% agree that you need data management in first, because I think you can start with portfolios and projects versus product data. There certainly are some things that require PDM as a base, but PPM is not one of them. It might make an interesting precedent diagram.rnrnI formalized my reply and turned it into a post. Thanks for your question, I hadn’t revisited that article for over five year!rnrnhttp://tech-clarity.com/clarityonplm/2010/plm-industry-affair/rnrnJim
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
Jim,rn1- yes, I agreern2- also agree and I see this as one of quite difficult taskrn3- I think I’ve answered and commented this (PPM) in my previous post and generally agreed rn4 – this one is funny as I was not able to find any mention regarding “big picture” but probably I know what you meanrnVladimir
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
By “Bio Picture” I meant my “biographical picture” – just the picture of me at the end. Just poking a little fun at myself.
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Jim,rnOK, I understand but then it’s pure Project (maybe Programme) Management and then is valid my example from my first post and I will paraphrase it : It’s fine if Project Mngmt is part of PLM but don’t put label PLM for pure Project (Programme) Managemnt :-)rnThanksrnVladimirrnrn
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
Oh I see now I was just very quick and mixed “bio” and “big” ….
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding
… just to complete it and this is my issue when I read some notes or blogs about PLM and I will overstate: MS Office Project it’s also PLM 🙂 I’m kidding