• Dassault Systèmes continues to make significant progress on the 3DExperience vision they laid out 5 years ago. This strategy has seen them transform from a software vendor offering distinct solutions for a variety of functional areas to a company that leads with a strong business transformation message backed up by a platform of solutions. I dropped "PLM" from the title of last year's strategy review. I feel even better about that decision a year later. They now have a broad software suite brought to market as solutions tailored to support key initiatives in the vertical industries they serve. As times goes … [ read more ]

    Dassault Systèmes Strategy 2017+
  • The Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies ebook explains how smaller companies in the high technology industry find themselves stuck between full-featured Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems that feel out of reach and less capable solutions including cloud-based file sharing or very basic data management applications. They know they can’t afford the errors and inefficiency inherent to informal data and process management, but can’t afford a large time, resource, and financial investment to fix their problems. Unfortunately simple solutions like web file sharing, while very attractive, fall … [ read more ]

    Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies
  • The How-to Guide to Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD  shares best practices for moving from 2D to 3D. The guide shares the reasons you should consider going from 2D to 3D, common challenges to avoid, and benefits enjoyed by other companies who gone to 3D. The guide then shares advice to make your switch from 2D to 3D CAD a success. The recommendations were developed by analyzing the responses of Top Performing companies and comparing them to Average Performing companies.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting … [ read more ]

    Best Practices for Going from 2D to 3D CAD
  • The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration … [ read more ]

    Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)
  • What type of experiences prepare engineering students the best for "real world" industry work? What should new graduates know when they start their first job?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on the engineering skills gap. We are exploring questions such as, what types of things do you look for in a new graduate? How can engineering colleges and universities improve their curriculum to better prepare students for today's modern products?  What concerns do you have about the future engineering workforce?Developing the future workforce is critical to the … [ read more ]

    What Skills Do You Wish Engineering Graduates Had? (Survey Invite)

How Top Performers Implement, Operate, and Maintain PLM Integration (survey findings)


plm_integration_thumbHow Top Performers Implement, Operate, and Maintain PLM Integration – Best Practices for Integrating Product Lifecycle Management shares survey results detailing how Top Performers implement their PLM systems. The research uncovers integration challenges and best practices across the PLM Integration Lifecycle, recognizing that implementing integration is only the first step in the process.

Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration required).

For the full report, please visit our sponsor, Razorleaf (free of charge, registration required).

Table of Contents

  • plm-integration-lifecycle-frameworkExecutive Overview
  • The Business Value of Integrating PLM
  • When do Companies Begin Integrating?
  • Introducing the PLM Integration Lifecycle
  • Implementation Challenges
  • Operation Challenges
  • Maintenance Challenges
  • Business Impacts
  • Quantifying the Impact
  • Identifying the Top Performers
  • Top Performers Experience Fewer Negative Impacts
  • Top Performers Integrate More
  • Top Performers Integrate with More Advanced Tools
  • Top Performers Integrate with More Advanced Enterprise Applications
  • Top Performers Integrate More PLM Data
  • Top Performers Use More Advanced Integration Techniques
  • Focusing on the Future: The Impact of IoT on PLM Integration
  • Conclusion
  • Recommendations
  • About the Author
  • About the Research
  • Copyright Notice

Executive Overview

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) helps manufacturers in many ways ranging from operational efficiencies to top-line financial improvement. It improves business performance in multiple dimensions including increased revenue, reduced product cost, and decreased product development cost. But PLM is just one of many systems in the engineering and enterprise software ecosystems, and provides greater value when it shares data and connects workflows with other software. As reported in Product Lifecycle Management Beyond Managing CAD, “Top Performers are much more likely to integrate PLM with a host of other systems.”
We surveyed over 150 companies to understand their PLM integration strategy, processes, and technical enablers in order to understand how proper integration can extend PLM value. The findings indicate that the vast majority of manufacturers view PLM as “Strategic” or “Important.” It also finds that many believe that PLM integration will become even more strategic (and challenging) as IoT initiatives progress.

In order to understand how companies get the most business value from PLM integration, we identified manufacturers that were gaining the largest operational benefit from their PLM implementation, the Top Performers. These leaders achieve significantly better than average PLM business benefits. We analyzed what these companies do differently related to PLM integration in order to offer advice to poorer performing companies. The analysis determines that Top Performers in gaining the benefits from PLM:

  • strategy_by_performance_bandAre more likely to view PLM integration as strategic
  • Integrate PLM to more design tools and more enterprise applications
  • Integrate PLM to more advanced tools and applications
  • Are more able to implement, operate, and maintain PLM integration in an agile, cost-effective way
  • Experience fewer operational issues including:
    • Needing to look for data in multiple systems
    • Duplicate data entry
    • Data inconsistency across systems

We also discovered that these Top Performers take different approaches to integrating PLM, leveraging a variety of techniques but opting toward more advanced, maintainable techniques like a hub and spoke approach. Read on to find out more about PLM integration and what sets the Top Performers apart across the PLM Integration Lifecycle spanning integration implementation, operation, and maintenance.


PLM helps companies improve product innovation, product development, and engineering efficiency and helps enhance communication across the enterprise and the supply chain. Improving PLM integration helps companies achieve the benefits PLM has to offer, making it a highly strategic investment. The level of importance, along with the level of complexity, will only increase as companies move to smarter, more connected products and the IoT.

Top Performers, those that get the most benefits out of their PLM systems, are more likely to view PLM integration as strategic. They integrate more design tools and enterprise applications with PLM, and integrate PLM to more advanced tools and applications. They also integrate more data, including more information that spans the enterprise and the supply chain. The leads us to the conclusion that better PLM integration is simply good business.

Top Performers take different approaches to integrating PLM, employing a variety of tools but more likely including adaptable techniques like a hub and spoke approach that provides benefits across the PLM Integration Lifecycle. The result is that these Top Performing companies are more able to implement, operate, and maintain PLM integration in an agile, cost-effective way and experience less need to look for data in multiple systems, perform less duplicate data entry, and find less data inconsistency across systems.


Based on our experience and the research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:

  • Manufacturers should integrate PLM with a broader number of enterprise applications and design tools
  • Companies should integrate with more advanced systems, including those that extend beyond Engineering into the enterprise and the supply chain
  • Companies should use a variety of integration techniques depending on the specific solutions and connectivity methods available, leveraging more advanced approaches such as hub and spoke when practical to provide more agility across the PLM Integration Lifecycle
  • Manufacturers should consider outside expertise to fill the PLM integration knowledge gap
  • Companies should focus integration plans and efforts beyond the initial implementation to optimize across the entire PLM Integration Lifecycle


  1. To any of you that tried to download the full report before I added proper link to the Razorleaf side, please accept my apologies! We try to get it right for you, but sometimes we fall a bit short. It’s updated now.

  2. To get the most out of your IT systems you need them to work together. Product data comes in lots of different formats and are stored in anything from a pdf to a SQL database. In the long run we need to integrate anything from a simple word document, a complex SolidWorks assembly, to a database containing electrical connection data. The only way to do that is to totally abandon the idea of “a Single point of Truth”. The future will be to integrate data. In the same way as the world need to have an Internet of Things we need an Internet of Product Data (IoPD).
    Best regards
    Jeppe Sörensen

    • Thanks for sharing, there are some interesting parallels between IoT and product data – particularly the complexity and varied interrelationships between nodes.


Speak Your Mind