• On Thursday, April 27 at 2:00 EDT, Michelle Boucher will share tips to improve the efficiency of simulation preprocessing.  During this webinar,  Shawn Wasserman, simulation editor at ENGINEERING.com, will join Michelle. This webinar will reveal: The top improvement areas you should focus on to get even more value from simulation Common challenges during the preprocessing phase Best practices to overcome those preprocessing challenges Case studies demonstrating the benefits of efficient preprocessing   Register for this live event.   … [ read more ]

    Webinar: Solving the Bottlenecks of Simulation Preprocessing
  • The Design Data Management Maturity Improves Profitability, Analyzing Best Practices for Managing Designs report shares fresh survey data and interviews. It updates our design data management research to cover new trends like using cloud file sharing applications to manage data. It also drills down on the topics of complexity and non-value added time spent managing design data, and shares metrics on the business improvements available from design data management best practices and technologies. Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report or title to download the full PDF (free of charge, no … [ read more ]

    Design Data Management Maturity Improves Profitability (survey report)
  • How should you improve access to service and parts information? Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned  in this new survey on managing product service and parts information. The survey explores ways to streamline parts information for service technicians and the associated benefits. We will explore questions such as: What are the biggest challenges you should focus on to improve the efficiency of service visits? What type of information would service technicians find most useful ? How can you improve the accuracy of service manuals? We would like to learn what you find hard and … [ read more ]

    Managing Product Service and Parts Information (Survey Invitation)
  • Tech-Clarity's Medical Devices Manufacturers Software Selection Guide helps manufacturers identify the right buying criteria for software solutions to support developing, producing, and servicing medical devices. This buyer's guide also takes into account unique needs for medical device companies including regulatory compliance and support for the FDA's Case for Quality. Tech-Clarity’s Buyer’s Guides go beyond software functionality to provide a framework of requirements that impact implementation success and long-term ROI, including: Software capabilities Implementation User adoption … [ read more ]

    Medical Devices Manufacturers Software Selection Guide
  • How do consumer packaged goods companies manage quality? Please share your thoughts in our short Quality Management Survey. Tech-Clarity invites you to join a research study on best practices in quality management.  If you've already completed the survey  –> please share with a colleague or you social media friends using the “Share/Save” buttons above. If you haven’t taken the survey  –> please: Take the survey now Complete the survey and receive a free copy of the final report. In addition,  25 eligible* respondents will win a $20 Amazon gift card. *See rules and … [ read more ]

    How do CPG Companies Manage Quality? (Survey Invitation)

Arena Solution’s PLM Vision 2014+

Share

What is Arena Solutions’ plan forarena-logo-horizontal PLM? From the early days as BOM.com to today, Arena has been a pureplay cloud PLM player. You could argue they had cloud PLM before cloud PLM was cool. They were a pioneer in the space, but where are they headed now?

This post is a part of my series on Strategic Visions of the Major PLM Vendors 2014+. The series took a bit of a break over the summer but please expect us to fill in a few gaps and then make some updates over the coming weeks.

History

bom_com_logoArena Solutions started with a simple premise, you should be able to share BOMs with contract manufacturers over the web. As the story was told to me by their original founder, it was born out of frustration in managing change and getting suppliers to make the right product revisions and prevent rework. That problem is still prevalent today in many manufacturers, whether they use third party production or not. The software has always more focused on the communications and coordination aspects of PLM than PDM / CAD data management.

The company has evolved over the years, but has always remained true to the cloud (ok, it was “software as a service” as a time because it was before anybody was calling SaaS “cloud software.” They were preaching the benefits of multi-tenant cloud solutions before most people knew what it meant. I hope the brief history helps.

NOTE: I found a “bom.com” logo, although I have no idea if that was the one they actually used. That was before I followed them. That was also long before kids started saying “that’s the bomb – dot – com” which still cracks me up. That’s probably only me, but who cares?

The Arena Solutions Strategy

Arena started as a supply chain-centric PLM solution with a lot of focus on small-to-midsized businesses (SMB). So the natural progression, one might think, would be to extend their CAD data management capabilities to compete with the mid-market offerings from Dassault Systemes, PTC, Siemens PLM, and others. After all, SMBs have issues there as well. Arena Solutions, however, hasn’t appeared compelled to create what others are offering. They have lots of traction in high-tech electronics companies that rely less on CAD and more on rapid, high quality communication with suppliers.  Over the years, Arena has listened to customers and stayed true to that. Not that they have haven’t supported CAD Data Management (they have), but they haven’t let that consume them.

So where do they go next? Steve Chalgren, VP Product Management & Strategy explained it this way, “We are building new products around the core solution, not just doing the same thing that others have done. We want to reinvent without adding complexity.” In fact, Arena Solutions has done something I don’t think any other PLM vendor has done – they have added Supply Chain solutions in addition to PLM. They haven’t gone out and created a supply chain planning (SCP) application with advanced planning algorithms to try to become Manugistics or i2, but they have extended to what some would argue is the greater value of PLM – getting outside of Engineering and the enterprise. Specifically, Arena has focused on:

  • Overview___Arena_SolutionsDemand Analysis
  • Projects
  • Compliance
  • Quality
  • Supplier Collaboration

This is in addition to the BOM Management, Item Management, Document Management, and Change Management that you would expect. In fact, one particularly interesting solutions is for sharing products with suppliers by creating and communicating a complete build package for suppliers based on the PDX format. Definitely a high-value activity and respects the fact that most manufacturers don’t let their suppliers fully “inside” their PLM system.

Is there really a market for “non-core” PLM solutions that focus more on the supply chain than Engineering? Arena Solutions’ results indicate there is. According to VP of Marketing Kent Kilmer, Arena has seen a large percentage of their growth from new products. That’s always a positive indicator of a strategy that resonates with customers. That’s what the future of Arena Solutions looks like to me, as always I am open to feedback and additional insight.

Related Posts

See other posts in our on PLM Strategies of the Major PLM Vendors 2015+ series:

Dassault Systèmes PLM Vision 2015+

Synergis Software PLM Vision 2015+

See more in our Strategic Visions of the Major PLM Vendors 2014+ series including:

Aras PLM Vision 2014+

Autodesk PLM Vision 2014+

Dassault Systèmes PLM Vision 2014+

Infor PLM Vision 2014+

Oracle’s Vision for Agile 2014+

PTC PLM Vision 2014+

Also, don’t miss our The Strategic Visions of CAD/CAE Vendors 2014+

Speak Your Mind

*