• Dassault Systèmes continues to make significant progress on the 3DExperience vision they laid out 5 years ago. This strategy has seen them transform from a software vendor offering distinct solutions for a variety of functional areas to a company that leads with a strong business transformation message backed up by a platform of solutions. I dropped "PLM" from the title of last year's strategy review. I feel even better about that decision a year later. They now have a broad software suite brought to market as solutions tailored to support key initiatives in the vertical industries they serve. As times goes … [ read more ]

    Dassault Systèmes Strategy 2017+
  • The Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies ebook explains how smaller companies in the high technology industry find themselves stuck between full-featured Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems that feel out of reach and less capable solutions including cloud-based file sharing or very basic data management applications. They know they can’t afford the errors and inefficiency inherent to informal data and process management, but can’t afford a large time, resource, and financial investment to fix their problems. Unfortunately simple solutions like web file sharing, while very attractive, fall … [ read more ]

    Finding PLM to Fit Mid-Sized High-Tech Companies
  • The How-to Guide to Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD  shares best practices for moving from 2D to 3D. The guide shares the reasons you should consider going from 2D to 3D, common challenges to avoid, and benefits enjoyed by other companies who gone to 3D. The guide then shares advice to make your switch from 2D to 3D CAD a success. The recommendations were developed by analyzing the responses of Top Performing companies and comparing them to Average Performing companies.This eBook is one in a series of three:Transitioning from 2D CAD to 3D CAD Migrating from 3D CAD to a new 3D CAD Adopting … [ read more ]

    Best Practices for Going from 2D to 3D CAD
  • The Reducing Cost of Quality in CPG report shares perspectives from a survey of over 175 CPG companies to determine how Top Performers manage consumer packaged goods quality. The research finds that these leading companies are able to achieve better quality results with lower internal costs. The report analyzes their processes, organizational structures, and enabling technology to determine how they can get better quality results without placing a financial burden on the business.Please enjoy the summary below, or click the report to download a PDF overview (free of charge, no registration … [ read more ]

    Reducing Cost of Quality for Consumer Packaged Goods (survey report)
  • What type of experiences prepare engineering students the best for "real world" industry work? What should new graduates know when they start their first job?Please share your experience, thoughts, and lessons learned in this new survey on the engineering skills gap. We are exploring questions such as, what types of things do you look for in a new graduate? How can engineering colleges and universities improve their curriculum to better prepare students for today's modern products?  What concerns do you have about the future engineering workforce?Developing the future workforce is critical to the … [ read more ]

    What Skills Do You Wish Engineering Graduates Had? (Survey Invite)

Strategies of the Major PLM Vendors 2015+

Share

Last year we embarked on our first ever roundup of PLM vendors’ strategic directions. Well, we didn’t get as far as we wanted beyond the more prominent vendors, but we’re back at it for 2015! The market is anything but stagnant. In fact, I think the strategies of the “big guys” are about as different as I’ve ever seen them. We’ll refresh the major vendors and try to hit some of the more niche vendors that we missed last year, particularly for smaller manufacturers (a common request).

Also, don’t miss Michelle Boucher’s The Strategic Visions of CAD/CAE Vendors 2014+ that covers design tools in a bit more granularity. She will be updating her views along the way as well.

Note: Please see our update to this post Strategies of the PLM Vendors 2016+.

 

The Source of our Perspective

We are fortunate to have a unique perspective on the enterprise and engineering software industries. We get to speak with vendor executives, product managers, developers, and others that make the decisions on the future of their products and product lines. Sometimes these are open meetings that include the press and customers, but often times we are briefed in confidence. Of course we can’t share any confidential information or we would never be invited back, but it does help us gain a broader perspective.

Beyond what the vendors are saying, we get to speak with their users . These are the R&D, Engineering, Program Management, Product Development, IT leaders, and executive teams that use the software. This helps ground what happens in PowerPoint with what is happening in the real world. We and also have strong relationships with consulting firms that are intimately involved in implementations.

Our view, however, is just one of many. The last series generated some great discussions both on our site and in the “blogosphere.” Please share your views!

The PLM Market in 2015+

So what’s happening at the highest level? There are few interesting things that I’m paying attention to for PLM:

  • Smaller, simpler approaches to PDM and PLM (including cloud solutions) are emerging and gaining some traction
  • The larger vendors are expanding. I always talk about “The Four Dimensions of PLM Expansion” as 1) To more people, 2) Covering a richer view of the product, 3) Enabling more processes, and 4) Supporting further up and down the product lifecycle. But what I am talking about includes expanding beyond PLM (or at least today’s definition of PLM).
  • More integration and expansion of suites (along the traditional four dimensions)
  • Industry specialization

Coverage

Companies I plan to cover in this series include:

  • Others – this is a vibrant market with lots of solutions, including some interesting new players. Here is a thumbnail of a few. Some you might argue are not really “PLM” vendors. I am sure I will miss some and won’t provide enough detail on any here, but here is a quick recap. Some of the names might surprise you. Stay tuned.
  • Categories not Planned in This Series – (sorry!)
    • Process-specific PLM players
    • Product Portfolio Management (PPM) specialists
    • Design tool (CAD, CAM, etc.) specialists without PLM offerings – but see
    • Simulation (CAE) specialists without PLM offerings
    • Requirements Management (RM) specialists
    • Configuration Management (CM) specialists
    • MRO / SLM specialists
    • ALM specialists
    • Business that focus primarily on AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) versus product engineering and manufacturing

Feedback

OK, who did I miss? Who should I prioritize? What do I need to know?

Related Posts

The Strategic Visions of CAD/CAE Vendors 2014+

 

SPEAK YOUR MIND

  1. In PLM Market 2015 report, why didn’t you include GT Nexus. I heard they are expanding their Logistic offering to include PLM end to end process. What have you heard?
    Also, I expected to see TradeStone. Why was this company not on your list?

    Thanks,

    • I haven’t been briefed on any plans by GT Nexus in the PLM space. I certainly would be open to it, do you know who would be the right person to contact. We haven’t published much on the industry specialist PLM vendors like Tradestone. I would like to, but it’s just been a bandwidth issue!

      Thanks for your comments,
      Jim

Speak Your Mind

*