Read Kalypso founding partner George Young and Tech-Clarity President Jim Brown discuss their perspectives on enabling software for NPDI in Consumer Goods Technology’s 2014 Readers Choice Awards for New Product Development and Introduction Software.
- Executive Overview
- Lean IT Overhead
- Reuse
- Collaboration
- Enabling the Bigger Product Development Picture
- The Corporate Advantage
- The IT Advantage
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
- About the Research
Executive Overview
Manufacturers must remain vigilant about managing cost in today’s uncertain economic times. Lean IT organizations and budgets lead many to consider the benefits of rationalizing their software systems. One system that manufacturers should consider standardizing is Computer Aided Design (CAD). Even in the best of times, manufacturers should consider standardizing on a single CAD solution. Cost savings are attractive and are certainly attainable through consolidation. Beyond cost savings, though, are even greater strategic benefits. At the workgroup level, manufacturers can take advantage of better design collaboration and CAD model reuse. Broader benefits include the ability to share best practices across teams. The ability to unify product development processes and data across the enterprise is even more strategic. Common processes and centralized data are particularly advantageous as a part of a full system for product design and development that supports design, analysis, data management, product compliance, documentation, and other related innovation tools. At the highest level, standardizing CAD software offers corporate benefits. For example, a single CAD environment can enable a “design anywhere – build anywhere” strategy. This approach allows companies to rapidly adjust to market changes and resource shortages by offering the ability to transfer design or production to new facilities without concern for incompatible design data, tools, or processes. From the IT perspective, consolidation provides the ability to focus resources on a smaller number of solutions. This reduces workload and cost and allows IT to provide a higher level of business support with today’s lean organizations. Of course not all businesses have the opportunity to unify their CAD solutions due to customer and supplier constraints, but there are multiple advantages for those that can. [post_title] => Consolidating CAD - Benefits of a Unified CAD Strategy [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => consolidating-cad-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:27:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:27:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://tech-clarity.com/?p=3566 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 3501 [post_author] => 2 [post_date] => 2013-12-24 12:35:11 [post_date_gmt] => 2013-12-24 17:35:11 [post_content] =>



Executive Overview
Many things factor into the profitability of a product. Innovation, satisfying customer wishes, and product performance drive sales, command price premiums, and boost top-line results. These get a lot of attention and engineers focus passionately on the form, fit, and function of their designs. But engineers don’t have the ability to evaluate the product cost impacts of their decisions to drive profitability from the expense perspective. Too few companies include a thorough “design for cost” analysis in their product development process to optimize profits. Engineers must optimize cost and make design tradeoffs early in the lifecycle when there is still design flexibility. “You need to have the right concept early on,” advises the Manager of Cost Engineering for a major automotive OEM. “The leverage you have is much higher when you start.” It’s critical to get the cost right as early as possible, particularly for high-volume parts. Most engineers don’t have visibility to the impact their decisions have on cost. They can’t optimize cost with other design parameters because they don’t have the right information. Product Cost Management (PCM) processes and software enable manufactures to design for cost by providing early visibility to the cost implications of design decisions. PCM allows companies to simulate and evaluate different manufacturing scenarios to develop an ideal “should cost” model based on detailed knowledge of materials, manufacturing processes, and supply chain costs. PCM benefits go beyond design. Most sourcing efforts result in suboptimal pricing because they aren’t based on how much a part should cost. Predicting manufacturing and supply costs confidently helps companies negotiate better prices based on facts and enables transparent, open discussion with suppliers. “We tell suppliers we aren’t looking for a cost reduction,” explains the Manager of Design Costing and Analysis for an agricultural machinery producer. “We want to improve their process and decrease their work so they can reduce the cost. It’s critical to start the discussion this way.” Beyond savings from one-time negotiations, PCM helps educate suppliers on how to get closer to an ideal should cost model. This win-win approach sets up continuous improvement with vendors to improve prices without putting unrealistic pressure on suppliers to blindly reduce cost. In the end, PCM changes negotiations to a battle of knowledge versus a battle of will and drives more sustainable cost reduction over time. [post_title] => Product Cost Management - A Knowledge Based Approach to Optimizing Product Cost [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => pcm-wp [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:27:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:27:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://tech-clarity.com/?p=3491 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 3394 [post_author] => 2 [post_date] => 2013-10-28 12:15:36 [post_date_gmt] => 2013-10-28 16:15:36 [post_content] =>

Table of Contents
- Executive Overview
- The Business Value of PDM – Controlling Product Data
- The Business Value of PDM – Making Product Data Accessible
- The Business Value of PDM – Sharing Product Data
- Achieving Value Quickly with Preconfigured PDM
- Getting Started
- Taking Advantage of (and Extending) the Benefits
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
- About the Research
Executive Overview
Manufacturers today face challenging markets and an uncertain global economy. To survive they are trying to improve the speed of product development despite reduced headcount and budgets. One positive note is that many manufacturers are gaining significant value by implementing product data management (PDM) solutions. Tech-Clarity interviewed several small to midsize manufacturers (Table 1) to understand their experiences. Each of these companies implemented PDM for different business reasons, although several common themes were repeated. These themes are consistent with previous research on the topic, and include:- Control and secure product-related data
- Improve the ability to quickly find and reuse information
- Share product knowledge and collaborate with other departments
Company | Description |
Veeraja Industries | Total solutions provider of coolant filtration, chip removal and coolant management |
Flovel Energy | Fully integrated hydro power equipment supplier |
Weir Valves & Controls | End-to-end whole plant solutions to nuclear, fossil-fired and renewable power stations |


Table of Contents
- Executive Overview
- Understand the Sustainability Imperative
- Address Today’s Reality of Regulation
- Recognize the Breadth of Regulatory Demands
- Assess Your Sustainability Maturity
- Target a Level of Maturity Appropriate for your Industry
- Develop a Design for the Environment Strategy and Culture
- Understand Barriers to the Design for the Environment Process
- Adopt a Proven DFE Process
- Enable Design for the Environment with a Platform Approach
- Extend the Value of the Platform
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
Executive Overview
Today’s manufacturers face severe social and business sustainability pressure as the environmental impacts of industry become more visible and concerning to customers and investors. The spectrum of sustainability challenges is extensive, although manufacturers typically prioritize compliance with regulations focused on eliminating hazardous and restricted substances in products. These regulations put the business at tangible risk today, carrying the potential for market exclusion, fines, and brand damage. Addressing environmental compliance regulations is now a critical capability to maintain profitability in the manufacturing industry. “Environmental compliance is just good business,” explains Brian Martin, Senior Director of Corporate Product Environmental Compliance for electronics company Seagate. “It’s about making sure we can sell our products across the world without any impediments.” Despite the potential impacts to top and bottom line performance, today’s manufacturing companies are at very different levels of maturity with their sustainability practices. At a minimum, however, they must comply with a myriad of complex regulations including RoHS, REACH, and the Dodd-Frank Act governing conflict minerals. Addressing current environmental compliance regulations can be a time-consuming and expensive undertaking. Manufacturers need to approach sustainability with a proactive, holistic approach to get products right the first time if they hope to address compliance efficiently. This “design for the environment” (DFE) approach addresses product-oriented requirements early in design. It allows engineers to make sustainable choices based on timely feedback as the design evolves. This allows them to make optimal choices at the time materials and components are selected, before windows of opportunity close and make these decisions more costly and disruptive Better practices and enabling technology are the keys to effective and affordable DFE. An integrated, platform approach based on Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) meets sustainability demands at much lower cost. In fact, Tech-Clarity and Aberdeen research indicate that better compliance practices yield better results, yet actually cost less. The capabilities, data, and processes put in place for environmental regulatory compliance can also serve as the foundation for manufacturers to extend up the sustainability maturity curve by adding additional requirements including improved recyclability and reduced energy consumption. They can even go beyond sustainability to improve their ability to design for optimal cost, quality, supply chain risk, and more as the world economy and the business strategy dictate. [post_title] => PLM's Role in Enabling Design for Environment [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => plm-dfe [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:27:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:27:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://tech-clarity.com/?p=3372 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 3359 [post_author] => 2 [post_date] => 2013-10-16 09:47:24 [post_date_gmt] => 2013-10-16 13:47:24 [post_content] => [post_title] => Infographic - The Value of Product Data Management (PDM) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => pdm-infographic [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:27:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:27:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://tech-clarity.com/?p=3359 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 9 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 3339 [post_author] => 2 [post_date] => 2013-09-19 11:32:26 [post_date_gmt] => 2013-09-19 15:32:26 [post_content] =>

Table of Contents
- Executive Overview
- Why Innovate?
- Why Enable Innovation?
- The Five Myths about Innovation Management Software
- Myth 1 – Process and Software Will Stifle Innovation
- Myth 2 – Innovation Begins and Ends with an Idea
- Myth 3 – PPM is Only for New Products
- Myth 4 – Innovation Management Software Will Slow Us Down
- Myth 5 – We Don’t Have Time and Resources to Implement
- Getting Started, Practical First Steps
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
Executive Overview
Product innovation is critical to differentiate and remain competitive in today’s fast-paced, global markets. Bolstering innovation to a core competency helps manufacturers drive higher revenue, lower cost, and mitigate risk. So why is it so hard for companies to improve innovation performance and drive meaningful business value? Innovation management software helps drive this new business value. Enabling technology helps companies improve agility, productivity, and time to market by improving decision-making, visibility, and commercialization efficiency across the product lifecycle. “I am a huge proponent of tools that help innovation,” explains Erik Greenfield, Senior Director of Program Management at Immucor. “They are cost effective and help improve time to market.” The benefits available are compelling. As Tech-Clarity’s The ROI of Product Portfolio Management explains, the financial value comes from “a combination of increased revenue from higher sales volume and margin lift alongside reduced costs from better resource utilization, avoiding spending on low-value projects, and improved efficiency.” Despite the proven value of innovation management software, companies are often held back due to misconceptions. Tech-Clarity has identified five common myths that prevent or slow companies from using software technology to improve innovation performance:- Process and software will stifle innovation
- Innovation begins and ends with an idea
- Product portfolio management (PPM) is only for new products
- Innovation management software will slow us down
- We don’t have the time and resources to implement a system




- The Business Value of Effective Design Data Management
- Control, Access, and Share Design Data
- Avoid the Pitfalls of Unmanaged Data
- Leverage Existing Infrastructure to Centralize and Collaborate
- Pros of Managing Designs and Projects with SharePoint
- Cons of Managing Designs and Projects with SharePoint
- Explore SharePoint-based Design Management Solutions
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
Executive Overview
Tech-Clarity research shows that effectively managing design data offers tangible business value. It helps manufacturers grow their business, respond rapidly to market changes, and control cost to improve profitability. Data management does this by helping companies better control, access, and share their designs and related product information. Unfortunately, data management solutions have been out of reach for some companies due to cost and lack of IT resources, forcing them to rely on less effective approaches like storing data on shared drives and folders. These unmanaged approaches are risky and lead to inefficiency and errors, often relying on designers to follow confusing naming standards and file storage processes. One alternative to an unmanaged environment is to use a collaboration and document management platform such as Microsoft SharePoint to manage designs. This helps organize files and make information easier for designers to access. SharePoint is an attractive collaboration platform for manufacturers because it has a very low total cost of ownership (TCO), leverages existing investments, and requires very little user training. Although SharePoint offers some level of control and collaboration, it does not natively support the complexity of product development and engineering data. But SharePoint is more than a tool. It is designed as a development platform that can be extended for special needs like engineering. Software vendors with expertise in product development and engineering have taken advantage of this, extending SharePoint to handle the unique needs of managing CAD files and their complex relationships.









Table of Contents
- Executive Overview
- Adapt or Die: The Change Imperative
- The Constancy of Change
- Challenges Managing Change in the Factory
- Business Impacts Encountered during Factory Change
- Identifying the Top Performers
- Top Performers Demonstrate Advantages in Adaptability
- Top Performers Adhere to more Formal Change Processes
- Best Practices followed by the Top Performers
- Top Performers Demonstrate better Operational Capabilities
- Top Performer Software Capabilities
- Top Performer Software Enablers
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
- About the Research
Executive Overview
Manufacturers must adapt quickly to compete in today’s fast-moving, competitive, global markets. They must be agile to take advantage of opportunities and sidestep competitive threats. They have to be able to confidently implement quality, efficiency, and cost improvements resulting from Lean Manufacturing initiatives. There are a multitude of business drivers that demand change in the factory, ranging from tactical “tweaks” to strategic, market-facing overhauls like introducing new products or product lines. Unfortunately, the old adage that “change is hard” is very true in the factory. Manufacturers face numerous challenges adapting to change. These difficulties result in significant, negative business impacts, including:- Project impacts including cost overruns, unplanned labor, and missed due dates
- Outcome-related impacts including poor product quality and low productivity
- Top Performers are much better at understanding the full scope and impact of changes during the planning phase. To achieve this, they leverage processes and technologies that allow them to determine the impact of planned changes, simulate changes before they are implemented, and use some emerging capabilities including reality capture and electronically visualizing changes in the context of the existing factory
- Top Performers communicate and collaborate more effectively, sharing processes and information across departments. They accomplish this through organizational approaches such as cross-functional teams and change control boards (CCB), processes to share status and information, and technologies that provide online collaboration and a central repository for manufacturing and project information including BIM, PLM, and project management
- Top performers adhere to more formal processes, including formal change management processes, six sigma for change, and formal requirements and impact analysis


Table of Contents
- Introducing the Issue
- A New Addition to the Enterprise Ecosystem for Manufacturers
- Leverage a Product Analytics Platform
- Develop Requirements
- Access Product Data
- Collect and Manage Supply Chain Data
- Analyze and Compare to Targets
- Optimize Designs and Tradeoffs
- Validate and Document Results
- Monitor for Risk
- Applying the Product Analytics Framework
- Apply Analytics to Mitigate Supply Risk
- Manage Commercial Risk
- Measure Attainment of Technical Targets
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
Introducing the Issue
What do product weight, environmental compliance, part obsolescence, and product cost have in common? These, among other product attributes, are important factors that impact the revenue and profitability of a product. In addition:- They result from a series of design decisions including component, material, and supplier choices
- They are very difficult to change late in the design process
- Designers rarely have the right data to make optimal choices (or even understand the impact of their decisions) to influence them during design
Conclusion
Product Analytics is becoming an important competency for today’s manufacturers. Effective and timely product analytics helps manufactures design products right the first time, hit their targets, and mitigate risk. Following the product analytics framework of processes offers manufacturers the opportunity to transition design validation from an ineffective, expensive, ad-hoc approach to a proactive, enterprise methodology. It helps designers make tradeoffs and optimize design decisions when they are most flexible and can make the most positive impact.Recommendations
Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:- Manage product requirements centrally and net out requirements, recognizing that many will compete and require tradeoffs
- Analyze the impact of design choices in the context of the BOM by leveraging product data – configurations, BOMs, components – as it is developed
- Provide feedback during design, before it is too late and while flexibility is at its highest
- Validate against requirements and generate product documentation with efficiency and confidence, supporting audits and inquiries
- Extend compliance processes to support supply risk, commercial risk, and attainment of technical targets in a consistent, cohesive methodology
- Monitor adherence to requirements over the lifecycle of products as designs and requirements change
- Leverage a platform approach to product analytics to enable efficient, consistent processes integrated around shared data
- A repeatable reference architecture for innovation
- In introduction to the five sub-process for innovation - Envision, Engage, Evolve, Evaluate, Execute
- A compilation of best practice processes and technologies to effectively implement an innovation strategy
- Lessons learned from Microsoft's own innovation efforts
- A case study sharing Ericsson's successful innovation management efforts
- A reference guide to Microsoft technology and implementation partners focused on innovation management
- 3M
- Avanade
- Capgemini
- Ericsson
- Business Strategy Innovation
- Microsoft
- Pcubed
- PTC
- Quantum PM
- Siemens PLM
- Sopheon
- Tech-Clarity
- UMT
- United Healthcare
- Wolters Kluwer


- Software functionality
- Implementation
- User adoption
- Support
- Vendor characteristics / attributes
- Special needs for smaller or larger companies
- Industry needs
Table of Contents
- Introducing the PDM Buyer’s Guide
- The Product Data Management Imperative
- Analyze PDM Capabilities
- Service Requirements
- Consider Vendor Requirements
- Identify Unique Company Needs
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
Introducing the PDM Buyer's Guide
Product Data Management (PDM) is an important tool to help manufacturers overcome the complexities of designing, developing, producing, and supporting today’s products. Manual and ad-hoc approaches such as shared folders, FTP, Dropbox, and hard drives are simply not good solutions to manage critical, complex product information. These approaches may work for very small organizations, but quickly falter as organizations grow and people need to share information outside of a few core engineers. These techniques also fail to manage data relationships and complex file structures common to 3D CAD systems. PDM systems are purpose-built to address these issues. PDM is a structured, collaborative solution that helps manufacturers control, access, and share crucial product data. Selecting the right PDM system for your business has a large impact on productivity, product success, and profitability. The PDM Buyer’s Guide is a reference tool to guide you on what to look for when selecting a PDM system for your company. The guide is composed of four sections covering software functionality, service requirements, vendor attributes, and special company considerations (Figure 1). Each of these sections includes a checklist with key requirements to investigate when selecting PDM software. The guide focuses on common requirements that form the foundation of PDM for manufacturers:- Getting files under control so people can find the right revision with confidence
- Making sure concurrent updates don’t overwrite each other to avoid “the last save wins” syndrome
- Making information available outside of engineering
- Ensuring Intellectual Property (IP) is captured and accessible regardless of who stored it
- Getting away from complicated shared drive structures that lead to errors
- Making sure people don’t manufacture or purchase against the wrong drawing
- Provide “one version of the truth” versus multiple copies of designs






Table of Contents
- Executive Overview
- Understanding the Old ERP Trap
- Living with the Implications of the Old ERP Trap
- Cloud Overcomes the Financial Obstacles to Better Systems
- Cloud Breaks the IT Resource Barriers
- Cloud Keeps you Out of the Old ERP Trap
- Understand Myths and Realities of Cloud
- Take Advantage of Better Information and Decision-Making
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
Executive Overview
Tech-Clarity recently evaluated the benefits, requirements, and considerations of cloud-based enterprise software for manufacturers. Two recent reports, Assessing the Cloud PLM Opportunity and Integrating Cloud PLM, discussed the potential value of transitioning to cloud solutions. They also addressed a number of important factors manufacturers should examine before making the transition. This report extends those findings to help manufacturers determine if cloud ERP can help solve a far-too-common problem, companies stuck running insufficient, outdated manufacturing systems. Manufacturing appears to be on the verge of a rebirth and a period of opportunity not seen in our industry for many years. Unfortunately, most companies will not be able to take full advantage of this macroeconomic trend because they are stuck in one of two dead-end situations - the “Old ERP Trap” or the “No ERP Trap.” In these scenarios companies are bound to either legacy ERP applications running on outdated infrastructure or a hodgepodge of homegrown and/or informal systems. There are multiple disadvantages to running these antiquated systems. The primary reason identified by this research was not technical in nature. Manufactures will simply not be able to take full advantage of the economic revival without improving their ability to rapidly identify opportunities and adapt their business. Cloud ERP offers a potential new path to modernize manufacturing systems and helps companies overcome financial and resource barriers to change. But many manufacturers are concerned about the potential pitfalls of cloud-based solutions. Most of the concerns, as the previous reports discusses, are unfounded and easily mitigated. In fact, interviews for this report indicate that despite concerns, cloud ERP results in a better, lower risk implementation than most companies could support inhouse, offering web class performance and reliability. “People think they have better control and security with onsite software, but based on what I’ve seen that’s not the case,” observes Randy Copperman, VP Support Services for piezoelectric ceramics manufacturer Channeltech. “It’s not our business to build big data centers and protect information, someone else will do that better than I ever will. That’s the whole concept of outsourcing, that’s what the cloud vendors do.” Clearly there are some important factors to keep in mind. Not all cloud vendors are created equal. It’s important to evaluate the cloud ERP vendors’ capabilities for backup, recovery, support, performance, reliability, and security. Industry certifications such as SSAE 16 Type 2 are a good place to start. Most companies will find that their concerns are quickly alleviated and that cloud providers offer a higher level of service than they could provide internally. Once the misunderstandings about “going to the cloud” are clarified, cloud ERP offers a new path to modernizing systems that is worth serious consideration. [post_title] => Modernizing Manufacturing Systems with the Cloud [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => cloud-erp [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:27:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:27:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => http://tech-clarity.com/?p=3171 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 1 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 3164 [post_author] => 2 [post_date] => 2013-05-13 08:03:24 [post_date_gmt] => 2013-05-13 12:03:24 [post_content] => Hear Jim Brown discuss the myths and realities of Cloud ERP and how cloud-based systems can help manufacturers get out of the Old ERP Trap. Hear how cloud ERP helps overcome financial and IT resource constraints that keep companies stuck on outdated ERP systems that don't provide the information they need to make good, timely business decisions. Sponsored by Plex Systems.

All Results for "All"
Consolidating CAD – Benefits of a Unified CAD Strategy
Tech-Clarity Insight – Consolidating CAD – The Benefits of a Unified CAD Strategy offers insight into the strategic value companies can achieve by standardizing on a single CAD package. The report explains how to calculate an ROI for CAD consolidation based on direct cost savings. Perhaps more importantly, the research identifies a number of strategic…
Desktop Engineering Views on CAD Consolidation Research
Tony Lockwood of Desktop Engineering shared his thoughts on Tech-Clarity’s Consolidating Design Software, Extending Value Beyond 3D CAD Consolidation. I like his description of “working in a multi-CAD environment with multiple disconnected tools and multiple money pits bleeding you dry at every junction of your process.” Read the short article by Tony on Desktop Engineering.
Product Cost Management – A Knowledge Based Approach to Optimizing Product Cost
Product Cost Management – A Knowledge Based Approach to Optimizing Product Cost explains how manufacturers can design products for optimal cost in order to improve profitability. The research shares interviews with three industrial manufacturers on the way they work with their supply chains to reduce cost using an analytical, fact-based methodology to drive out unnecessary…
The Business Value of Product Data Management
The Business Value of Product Data Management – Achieving Rapid and Extendable Benefits with Preconfigured PDM shares the perspectives of three small to midsize manufacturers on the value they receive from PDM software. The report also offers Tech-Clarity’s views on the business value of PDM and explains how preconfigured PDM solutions can help companies gain…
PLM’s Role in Enabling Design for Environment
Tech-Clarity Insight – PLM’s Role in Enabling Design for Environment discusses the tremendous challenges manufacturers face from sustainability demands and regulations. The report discusses how companies can adopt a strategy and culture that helps them address sustainability and compliance needs early in design and how PLM software provides a platform of capabilities that can be…
Top 5 Misconceptions about Innovation Management Software
Tech-Clarity Insight – Top 5 Misconceptions about Innovation Management Software – Busting Myths to Improve Innovation, Time to Market, and Profitability discusses common misconceptions related to innovation, ideation, portfolio management, and project management software suites. These myths cause confusion and prevent companies from moving forward with important process improvements that innovation management software enables. Please…
Managing Design Data with SharePoint
Tech-Clarity Insight – Managing Design Data with SharePoint – Improving Product Design and Development using Low Overhead Collaboration Infrastructure explains how general document management and collaboration infrastructure can be extended to manage product designs. The report reviews the business benefits of controlling, accessing, and sharing design data and the challenges manufacturers face in unmanaged environments….
Webcast – Separating Innovation Fact from Fiction
Tech-Clarity’s Jim Brown will present his views on product innovation and innovation management software on the Separating Fact from Fiction to Power Product Innovation webcast. Jim will join Carrie Nauyalis of Planview to share findings from his upcoming Top 5 Misconceptions about Innovation Management Software report and Carrie’s provocative views on companies that “fake innovation.”…
Tech-Clarity Change Survey Covered in Machine Design
Elisabeth Eitel of Machine Design covered Tech-Clarity’s Best Practices for Factory Adaptability report. Hear her views on the results in Machine Design article Survey results: Manufacturers tell how they implement change.
Best Practices for Factory Adaptability
Tech-Clarity Perspective: Best Practices for Factory Adaptability – Top Performers Implement Change Faster and More Confidently shares survey results from over 250 manufacturers examining how they implement change in their factories. The study reviews the practices of the “top performers,” those that implement change more effectively in their plants, to determine best practice processes and…
Designing Products for Performance, Risk, and Compliance
Issue in Focus: Designing Products for Performance, Risk, and Compliance – Leveraging Product Analytics to Optimize Design Decisions and Tradeoffs shares the importance of proactively providing designers with insight into the many impacts of their design decisions. Product analytics is critical to help companies design and develop products with optimal cost, compliance, weight, performance, and…
Take a Survey on PLM’s Role in Product Development and Innovation
Tech-Clarity and Kalypso are looking for product-oriented companies to share their views on how Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) helps them with their new product development and product innovation performance. People willing to take between 5 to 10 minutes to take the survey will be given a free copy of the resulting report. Please share your…
Microsoft’s Innovation Management Framework White Paper and IM Consortium
Tech-Clarity would like to announce participation as a charter member and advisor of Microsoft’s Innovation Management Consortium and the release of a new white paper from Microsoft sharing the Microsoft Innovation Management Framework. The paper announces the consortium and shares a wealth of information and experience from Microsoft and other consortium members, including: A repeatable…
PDM (Product Data Management) Buyer’s Guide
PDM Buyer’s Guide – Ensuring Maximum Value from Product Data Management is an educational tool to help manufacturers evaluate and select the right data management solution to improve design, product development, and engineering performance. PDM helps companies control, access, and share information. This guide offers advice and requirements related to: Software functionality Implementation User adoption Support…
Webcast on Improving Design Management
Jim Brown will present his views on getting design data under control to improve time to market and design project cycle times. He will discuss how to use data management to simplify engineering efforts, reduce complexity, and prevent errors from incorrect revisions. He will also touch on the benefits of using a visually-oriented approach to…
7 Tips to Speed Time to Market
Jim Brown of Tech-Clarity published an article, 7 Tips to Speed Time to Market, on Innovation Management as a part of the Planview Learning Series. In the article, Jim overview some recent research on time to market and identifies a number of time-proven methods that help get products to market faster. You can also download…
Modernizing Manufacturing Systems with the Cloud
Tech-Clarity Insight: Modernizing Manufacturing Systems with the Cloud – Leveraging Cloud ERP to Improve Systems and Business Performance shares insights from three manufacturers and Tech-Clarity’s research into cloud enterprise systems to assess the cloud opportunity for ERP. The report discusses how the cloud ERP business model helps overcome financial and IT resource contraints that keep manufacturers…
Cloud ERP Myths, Realities, and the Old ERP Trap
Hear Jim Brown discuss the myths and realities of Cloud ERP and how cloud-based systems can help manufacturers get out of the Old ERP Trap. Hear how cloud ERP helps overcome financial and IT resource constraints that keep companies stuck on outdated ERP systems that don’t provide the information they need to make good, timely business decisions….