What software tools do engineers need to support product design? Which capabilities will help engineers develop products that are higher quality, more personalized, more innovative, and lower in ownership cost? These are challenging tasks to achieve that are further complicated due to increasing product complexity, engineering changes, and multiple engineering disciplines. However, with the correct…
- Executive Overview
- The Business Value of Investing in Engineering
- Support End-to-End Processes with an Integrated Solution
- Mechanical Design
- Electrical and Electronic Design
- Simulation
- Manufacturing
- Technical Publications
- Design Data Management
- Service Requirements
- Vendor Requirements
- Identify Unique Company Needs
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
- Acknowledgments
Executive Overview
Global competition, including low-cost providers, makes it hard to compete in today’s market. It is impossible to compete on price when competitors come from geographic regions with low employment costs. Consequently, companies must compete in other ways, such as with better, high quality products, more personalization, improved services, greater innovation, or lower cost of ownership. Achieving this requires improving efficiency, catching problems sooner, and making better decisions to lower product development costs and increase product quality. Consequently, teams must be agile enough to quickly respond to market shifts and customer demands. Products have to get to market as fast as possible to maximize the window of opportunity before low-cost providers can undercut prices with competing offerings.The Value of Digitalization
Efficiencies achieved through digitalization accelerate the development process and improve quality by creating a digital thread across the entire product development cycle. As a result, all information stays up to date, changes are propagated, and there is less risk of errors. However, it can be hard to know where to start, especially for a small or mid-size company. Smaller companies share many of the same challenges as larger companies, but lack the budget of a big OEM. The right software solution can help, but it must have the right capabilities, at an affordable price that will be manageable for a small company.Selecting the Right Solution
With so much to consider, how do you choose the right software solution to support your product life-cycle? This buyer’s guide serves as a guide to help you pick the right solution for your company. This guide covers requirements for a complete integrated product development suite. It has four major sections covering software functionality, service requirements, vendor attributes, and unique company considerations (Figure 1). Each section includes a checklist of key requirements to investigate when selecting software tools. This guide is not an all-encompassing requirements list. It provides a high-level overview.
While the amount of embedded software in today’s products is growing, for the purposes of this guide, it was not considered part of the scope.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:
- Create a digital thread across your development process with an end-to-end integrated product development suite
- Consider solutions that support mechanical design, electrical design, simulation, manufacturing, technical publications, and design data management.
- Ensure you have traceability across the entire lifecycle of your product
- Do not compromise on ease of use
- Support collaboration across the development lifecycle
- Work off a single high-fidelity model to support your digitalization strategy and create a single source of truth
- Ensure your solution will have the support behind it to make it a success at your company.
- Select a vendor who will be a good partner.
Table of Contents
- Reducing Non-Value-Added Time in CAD Design
- Engineers Don’t Have Time to Waste
- Time Waster 1 - Can’t Find and Reuse Data
- Time Waster 2 – Lost CAD Designs
- Time Waster 3 – Preparing Data for Others
- Time Waster 4 – Managing Complexity
- Time Waster 5 – Managing Change
- Conclusions and Next Steps
Engineers Don't Have Time to Waste
Too Much Spent Time on Non-Value-Added Data Management Product and product development complexity have increased while time-to-market goals have become more aggressive. The combination of these two trends puts a significant squeeze on the time available for engineers and designers to design and document their inventions. Unfortunately, companies waste an average of 15% of their engineers’ time on non-value-added data management tasks. Almost one-third of these companies spend over 25% of their engineers’ time this way. That’s one out of every four days wasted on data management efforts that could be better spent innovating. Design Data Management Maturity Relieves the Pressure What if companies could give that wasted time back to their technical personnel? That’s exactly what leading companies do. Our research shows that Top Performing companies – those that are better able to quickly and efficiently design high quality, innovative products – spend 25% less time on nonproductive data management tasks. What enables these companies to perform better than their competitors? These leaders are more likely to have adopted more mature data management capabilities1 and use more structured, collaborative data management solutions including Product Data Management (PDM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM). Let’s take a look at how these solutions help engineers avoid wasting precious design time by allowing them to control, access, and share design data.Conclusions and Next Steps
Avoid Time-Wasting Traps through Better Practices
The time-wasting events highlighted in this eBook are some of the most common issues we find in our research, but they are only a sample. The key to avoiding wasteful traps and gaining more productive design time is adopting mature design data management practices. With these better practices in place, companies are more likely to be able to meet their product development targets and win the CAD design challenge.
Put in Place the Right Design Data Management Technology
Mature design data management goes hand-in-hand with design data management technology. It’s essential for companies to control, access, and share CAD data effectively whether the system they choose is basic PDM or a more capable PLM system.
Get Started, Take Advantage of the Benefits
Companies that don’t have an effective PDM or PLM system in place are putting their design efficiency – and more – at risk. Rising complexity across product, product development, and other dimensions is increasing data management challenges, the potential for issues, and the need for design data management systems. Even for small teams, these systems provide structure and value that helps drive better design and business performance so companies can win at the CAD design game.
*This summary is an abbreviated version of the research and does not contain the full content. A link to download the full report is available above.
If you have difficulty obtaining a copy of the report, please contact us.
[post_title] => Avoid 5 CAD Design Time Wasters (eBook)
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => open
[ping_status] => open
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => cad-design-time-wasters
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:28:20
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:28:20
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://tech-clarity.com/?p=8874
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[2] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 8839
[post_author] => 2572
[post_date] => 2020-04-29 11:30:03
[post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-29 15:30:03
[post_content] =>
What does it take for toolmakers to be competitive? What can mold makers do to improve their business?
Tech-Clarity's eBook, Breaking the Mold: How Toolmakers Are Transforming Operations to Stay Competitive explores these questions. The business of mold making is tough. Firstly, there is the time consuming bidding process where you need to provide an accurate, yet competitively priced bid and a realistic delivery date. However, many factors impact engineering and manufacturing, such as the quality of the part design, ability to manage cooling, and varied machining requirements. Significant effort is required and even small errors can significantly compromise profit margins. Despite the time and effort, mold makers, according to our survey respondents, only win 52% of the jobs they quote.
After winning the bid, a litany of further challenges await. Poor part designs, bottlenecks, complexity, changes, and more create obstacles to every business’s goal, profitability. How can toolmakers transform their operations to become more competitive and boost profitability? To answer this question, Tech-Clarity surveyed over 370 mold makers. This report reveals the results and provides recommendations to improve your business.
Please enjoy the summary* below. For the full report, please visit our sponsor Siemens (registration required).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- What It Takes to Be Competitive
- Challenges that Hold Mold Makers Back
- Identifying Best Practices
- Strategies to Overcome the Challenges
- Challenges with the End-to-End Process
- Supporting the End-to-End Process
- Streamline Bidding
- Support Collaboration During Tool Design
- Ensure Quality by Verifying Manufacturability
- Optimize Cycle Time
- Automate Production Planning
- Support Quality Verification Processes
- Use an Integrated Solution
- Looking to the Future
- Recommendations and Conclusions
- About the Research
- Acknowledgments
What It Takes to Be Competitive
Objectives for Competitiveness
How can you become even more competitive? Where should you focus? The graph shows the top five areas. At a high level, it is about keeping customers happy.
Quality
Ensuring the quality of your molds and the resulting parts can help you stand out from other mold shops. It gives customers a reason to do business with you. High quality helps you earn their loyalty because they know they'll be able to rely on you. However, injection molding is so complex, it is hard to predict exactly what will happen, so having the right systems and processes in place will help you catch problems as early as possible to ensure quality.
Cost
Cost is also critical. If you can keep your costs low, you can afford to be price competitive without compromising your profit margins. However, as with quality, you need to catch potential problems as early as possible to avoid expensive mold rework. Efficiency will also help keep development costs down.
Speed
Efficiency also helps you meet delivery dates. Customers desire short lead times, so removing bottlenecks will help you win more bids. Shorter cycle times also help. Shaving just a couple of seconds off can save your customer tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. That’s certainly a reason for a customer to want to work with you!
Market Share and Cycle Time
The more customers you win over, the bigger your market share, which will boost your visibility and reputation to help you win even more business.
Conclusions
The Opportunity for Mold Makers Mold makers need to keep customers happy to stay competitive. Consequently, they need to ensure the quality of the mold, the parts it produces, manage costs, and meet delivery dates. Unfortunately, several challenges make meeting their objectives difficult. Global competition is fierce, skilled workers are hard to find, and margins continue to thin. To overcome this, Top Performing mold makers support an end-to-end process with better collaboration and improved hand-offs between the different phases of the group. When looking at the end-to-end process, most toolmakers struggle with process bottlenecks and managing changes. By creating a digital thread across the entire process, there is traceability across the complete life-cycle. Design details can then be reused from one phase to the next, saving time by avoiding duplication of efforts, improving quality by reducing risks for introducing human error, and saving costs by catching problems sooner.Recommendations
Recommendations and Next Steps
Based on this research and our experience, we recommend that Automotive companies:
- Streamline bidding
- Support collaboration during tool design
- Ensure quality by verifying manufacturability
- Optimize cycle time
- Automate production planning
- Support quality verification processes
- An integrated platform can help
Do your design tools hold product development back? With the pressures of global competition, and the never-ending struggle of bringing innovative, cost-effective products to market efficiently, a smooth product design process is paramount. Unfortunately, the vast majority of companies, 99%, report they experience design bottlenecks that hold them back, which consequently hurts their success and diminishes their profitability.
Tech-Clarity's research report, Empower Engineers with Cutting Edge Design Tools studied this further. The findings reveal an inherent deficiency in today’s design environments hurts collaboration across design teams, especially when they are geographically distributed or involve third-parties. On the other hand, modern infrastructures take advantage of the latest innovations to enable a smooth flow of information across locations and provide the competitive advantage businesses need to succeed.
By surveying 240 companies, Tech-Clarity has identified the primary sources of bottlenecks in the design process and their impacts on the company. A startling 99% reported that design bottlenecks can negatively affect the company in numerous ways, including delayed time-to-market, excess cost, and poor quality. This report explores these issues further and identifies how to solve the challenges associated with design bottlenecks.
Please enjoy the summary* below. For the full report, please visit our sponsor SOLIDWORKS (registration required).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- The Reality of Today’s Product Development Environment
- Understand Collaboration Needs
- Silos Create a Barrier to Collaboration
- Understand Bottlenecks
- Impact of Bottlenecks
- Explore Solutions to Overcome Bottlenecks
- Use Technology to Solve the Problem
- CAD on the Cloud
- Do Not Underestimate Security Concerns with Existing Infrastructure
- Conclusions
- Recommendations
- About the Research
- Acknowledgments
The Reality of Today’s Product Development Environment
Staying Competitive
To successfully develop competitive products, companies must focus on a variety of factors, especially product performance, innovation, and quality. Achieving this falls on the shoulders of engineers, but juggling so many different requirements makes the job tough. To achieve these goals, product development teams must be empowered to make the best design decisions efficiently. However, several factors stand in the way.
Limitations of Product Development Environments
To identify factors that slow down engineers, we asked survey respondents about the top challenges of today's design environments (see graph). Due to all the criteria engineers must think about, they need access to a lot of information. Unfortunately, poor integration across tools makes it hard to find what they need. It also means it’s hard to know about changes that impact other parts of the design. Plus, design information tends to be in a format that is not easy to share nor easy to understand, especially for staff with less technical knowledge. This limits opportunity because when more people provide input, you can explore more ideas. More ideas lead to superior innovation and improvements in usability, quality, and manufacturability. IT limitations also create challenges. It takes time to maintain all the different software tools. Also, hardware investments are costly.
These problems are so widespread, surprisingly, only 5% do not experience challenges with today's design environments. In other words, 95% of companies suffer from design environment challenges that lead to design bottlenecks and collaboration problems. Let's explore these challenges further to understand their impacts.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Next Steps
Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:
- Invest in product development to improve competitiveness and boost profitability.
- Understand how challenges in the design environment contribute to collaboration challenges and bottlenecks.
- Do not underestimate the business cost of collaboration challenges.
- Consider options that allow design data to be shared via a web browser and on any device as a way to improve collaboration.
- Consider a CAD solution on the cloud as a way to overcome design bottlenecks and improve collaboration.
- Do not underestimate security risks in your existing infrastructure. A cloud solution may offer greater security protection.
Webcast Announcement
The Cloud: 4 Takeaways from New Research The need to innovate quickly to better respond to market and customer needs is more important than ever. Tech-Clarity surveyed more than 300 companies that design and/or manufacture products across a wide range of industries to find out how the cloud can help manufacturers improve their product development to drive higher levels of profitability. In this webinar, you will learn how cloud-native tools enable companies to reduce time wastage and production delays caused by product development challenges. Tech-Clarity’s research lead and an Onshape co-founder will provide some commentary and expand on the more surprising results. [post_title] => Faster Product Development on the Cloud (webcast) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => open [ping_status] => open [post_password] => [post_name] => faster-product-development [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:27:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:27:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://tech-clarity.com/?p=8812 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 8776 [post_author] => 2572 [post_date] => 2020-04-21 11:30:19 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-21 15:30:19 [post_content] =>
How can a company better utilize engineers’ time?
Today's market is hyper competitive; it is hard to stand out. To be successful, companies must empower their engineering teams to focus on product innovation, quality, performance and cost. Balancing those key criteria is challenging enough, but made even more challenging as engineers report they waste a third of their time on non-value added work. Tech-Clarity’s How-To Guide: Avoid Non-Value Added Work For Engineers explores how to overcome this challenge. Based on a survey of nearly 250 manufacturers, the report reveals best practices for managing data, communicating engineering changes, and collaborating with internal and external members of the development team. Together, these practices will help engineers focus more of their effort on making products more competitive.
Please enjoy the summary* below. For the full report, please visit our sponsor Dassault Systèmes (registration required).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Identify Bottlenecks
- Assess Non-Value Added Time
- Business Value of Eliminating Non-Value Added Work
- Recognize the Time Required for Check-ins
- Outdated Information Impacts Engineering Changes
- The Impact of Outdated Information on Collaboration
- Identifying the Top Performers
- Technology As a Collaboration Solution
- Consider the Security Risks of Email
- The Benefits of Real-Time Data Updates
- Recommendations
- About the Research
Executive Overview
Engineering Is Key to Competitive Differentiation Today's market is so competitive; it is hard to stand out. To be successful companies must empower their engineering teams to differentiate products on innovation, quality, performance, and cost. While balancing all those criteria can be a challenge, it is made even harder as engineers report they waste a third of their time on non-value added work. Even worse, 20
% of their time is spent working with outdated information, leading to more wasted effort and rework. One way companies can improve this situation is to provide engineers with real-time access to design data, in the right context. The result should be increased engineering bandwidth so engineers can focus more effort on making products more competitive.
Determining Best Practices
To determine best practices for accessing design information, Tech-Clarity analyzed survey responses from nearly 250 manufacturers to understand how they manage data, communicate engineering changes, and collaborate with both internal and external members of the development team.
The research shows that companies who are most successful, Top Performers, are nearly 2-times more likely to maintain up-to-date models. PDM/PLM makes these real-time updates possible.
What Can You Learn from This Research?
This report explores best practices for streamlining access to design data in real-time. It also exposes some challenges manufacturers should be aware of as they strive to maintain a competitive edge in today's complex and cutthroat environment. The report also reveals how manufacturers can plan for a design environment that will prepare them for long-term competitiveness.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Next Steps Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:- Understand how engineers spend their time and improve processes to minimize time wasted on non-value added work
- Consider solutions such as PLM or PDM to centralize design information and support change management and collaboration
- Evaluate options to design in the context of the assembly to improve collaboration and understand the impact of changes
- Consider real-time updates to keep CAD data up-to-date while minimizing or eliminating check-in times
- Establish means for secure, real-time collaboration with third parties to minimize delays in getting updated CAD data from them
What should you think about when selecting a software solution to support the development of medical devices while considering the Case for Quality and the EU MDR?
Tech-Clarity’s Medical Device Manufacturers' Software Selection Guide helps manufacturers identify the right buying criteria for software solutions to support developing, producing, and servicing medical devices. The guide also includes additional considerations for utilizing the Internet of Things (IoT) and other technological advancements such as augmented reality (AR) and 3D printing. Unique needs for medical device companies are also taken into account in the buyer’s guide, including regulatory compliance and support for the FDA’s Case for Quality and the European Union Medical Design Regulation (EU MDR).
Tech-Clarity’s Buyer’s Guides go beyond software functionality to provide a framework of requirements that impact implementation success and long-term ROI, including:
- Software capabilities
- Implementation
- User adoption
- Support
- Vendor characteristics / attributes
- Unique business needs
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Executive Overview
- Identify Your Challenges
- Transition from Document Centric to Product Centric
- Consider the Complete Lifecycle
- Manage the Product
- Manage Requirements (Customer Needs to Regulatory)
- Support Product Development for Hardware
- Support Software Development
- Enable Smart and Connected Products
- Ensure Regulatory Compliance
- Support Quality Management
- Plan for Manufacturing
- Control Suppliers
- Plan for Service
- Assess Implementation Requirements
- Consider Vendor Attributes
- Identify Specific Needs for your Company
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
- About the Research
- Acknowledgments
Executive Overview
The Opportunity for Medical Device Companies It’s an interesting time for medical device companies. Initiatives such as the FDA’s Case for Quality and new regulations like the European Union Medical Design Regulation (EU MDR) are shifting the traditional focus of regulatory compliance from a documentation driven approach to one that requires a greater focus on device quality and effectiveness. As discussed in Tech-Clarity’s Preparing for EU MDR – Product Submissions: A Sustainable Approach, while the changes may be challenging in the short term, in the end they can also create opportunity through more efficient processes that result in better devices and improved patient outcomes. In many cases, medical device companies will need to adopt new approaches. These new approaches may be an adjustment, but medical device companies that implement the right technology to support these new methods should find themselves at an advantage. The challenge is figuring out which technology to select. Let’s start with the fundamental goal for medical device companies. They are in the business of making people’s lives better. As Joel Hembrock, Senior Designer and CAD Administrator at Medtronic says, “Our patients are the people who benefit from our products. Restoring life is our main focus. [We want] to be giving people their lives back, restoring their health, allowing them to actually live again and not have their disease or any other ailment keep them from being able to live.” Technology advancements have opened up new and exciting opportunities that have the potential to further this mission. On top of this, an aging Baby Boomer population will create additional demand for medical devices. Consequently, the industry should see significant growth. In fact, the Evaluate MedTech World Preview 2018, Outlook to 2024 [1] report forecasts a 5.6% growth rate every year for the next five years. There Are Challenges to Overcome However, it will be the companies who can overcome the unique challenges in the industry who will be best positioned to take advantage of this growth. With lives at stake, patient safety is of the utmost importance. As such, the industry faces heavy regulations. Compliance is so critical that if medical device companies do not adhere to FDA, EU and other worldwide standards and regulations, they will not be profitable. However, so much time, effort, and cost go into compliance documentation; it takes resources away from innovating and ensuring high quality products. As a result, it is harder to take advantage of opportunities that will boost profitability. On the other hand, medical device companies who adopt practices focused on high quality devices can expect greater patient satisfaction, improved competitiveness, and higher profits. In fact, McKinsey estimates that firms who embrace quality focused best practices can increase profits by 3% to 4% of revenues. They predict the revenue increase alone could be a $3.5 billion opportunity for the industry [2] and this doesn’t even factor in the profitability improvements of avoiding costly quality issues. Unfortunately, for the industry, quality has been getting worse, not better. The FDA’s Medical Device Recall Report FY 2003 to FY 2012 found that recalls nearly doubled over the decade, showing a striking 97% increase in the number of recalls. Since 2012, the Stericycle Recall Index has continued to track regular increases on a quarterly basis in medical device recalls seeing a 39% increase in just four years from 2013 to 2017 [3]. To reverse this trend, medical device companies should adopt new approaches that enable a greater focus on quality. Shift from Document Centric to Product Centric One way to achieve this is by shifting from a document centric process to one that is product centric. This shift enables more focus on high quality, innovative products that meet patient needs. The good news is that this is possible with investments in the right software solutions. Software solutions can reduce manual, time intensive reporting processes to a push of a button. Rather than structuring processes around documentation, software solutions can allow you to focus on developing the right products and services that will meet patient needs. For these reasons, some medical device manufacturers integrate quality processes into their core product lifecycle management activities. By integrating quality processes throughout the product design and delivery lifecycle, companies can improve efficiency. With this approach, instead of wasting efforts searching for compliance supporting documentation and reporting, companies can use that valuable time for quality and innovation. The result will be higher profitability. Enabling Outcome-Based Healthcare Other changes in the medical device industry come from recent trends such as the transition to outcome-based healthcare in the US. In some cases, to be compensated, medical professionals must show positive patient outcomes. A way to accomplish this is to take advantage of innovation enabled by the Internet of Things (IoT). For example, IoT combined with software capabilities can be used to meet requirements for Unique Device Identifiers (UDIs) that will provide new levels of traceability and communication to demonstrate device effectiveness. The right software solution must be in place to effectively manage it. While UDIs present one possible use case for IoT, the potential opportunities for IoT go even further. IoT and other technological advancements such as augmented reality (AR) and 3D printing, create new opportunities for profitable new business models by enabling services that align with customer and patient needs. However, companies stuck following traditional document centric workflows may struggle to find the bandwidth to innovate with these new technologies. Meanwhile, competitors who can devote the resources to innovation will be well positioned to capture a leading market position. This situation makes it an ideal time to invest in a software platform that enables a product centric approach for the entire lifecycle of your device. Plan for the Right Software Platform As you evaluate your current needs, think through how your business needs may evolve due to the impact of technological advances in medical devices. For example, designing for connectivity may require new approaches to design. You will now need to consider things like sensors, ecosystems, and new IT development roles that will play a critical part of product development. Ensure your software platform will be able to meet both current and future needs as your product portfolio evolves. While you consider investments in software solutions, leverage existing systems that are working well. The new solution should use a platform that will leverage and extend the investments made in existing solutions, such as Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) if you are happy with them. However, the platform should support traceability across all systems to support compliance reporting and so that documentation can be updated once after changes without worrying about conflicting documentation that will put compliance at risk. Learn More By Downloading the Buyer's Guide With so much to consider, how do you select the right software technology to support the lifecycle of your devices? This buyer’s guide will serve as guidance to help you choose the right solution for your company. This guide consists of four major sections covering software tool functionality required for medical device companies, implementation requirements, vendor attributes, and unique company considerations (Figure 1). Each section includes a checklist of key requirements to investigate when selecting software tools. This guide is not an all-encompassing requirements list. It provides a high-level overview. [1] “Evaluate MedTech World Preview 2018, Outlook to 2024,” Evaluate, September 2018 (http://www.evaluate.com/thought-leadership/medtech/evaluatemedtech-world-preview-2018-outlook-2024). [2] Ted Fuhr, Katy George, Janice Pai, “The Business Case for Medical Device Quality,” McKinsey Center for Government, McKinsey & Company, October 2013 [3] “Number of Medical Device Recalls in the U.S. from 2013 to 2017,” Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/618125/medical-device-recalls-in-the-us-by-number/
Conclusion
The Cost of Poor Quality Medical device companies looking to improve profitability should shift their focus from a document centric process to a product centric process that will enable them to concentrate on quality. The cost of poor quality can be significant. In fact, McKinsey estimates that non-routine quality events cost the industry up to $5 billion. On the other hand, companies that focus on high quality enjoy a significant advantage with a potential increase in profits of 3% to 4% of revenues, according to McKinsey. The FDA has also concluded that a greater focus on quality is required. For example, they have found recalls have increased by 97%, with design errors being the leading cause. With the Case for Quality initiative, quality should become an area of heightened focus, which a product centric approach supports. Unfortunately, making this shift, while still meeting regulatory requirements is hard. However, with the right technology, companies can make it much easier. The Right Solution The right solution should consider all aspects of the product lifecycle from requirements, through design, testing, manufacturing, and service. It should streamline the regulatory process and automate as much as possible. With traceability across the lifecycle and all deliverables, it will be much easier to provide regulatory compliance documentation. That traceability should also extend to suppliers. The right software solution can make it much easier to bring the right, high quality medical device to market, providing a competitive advantage. This will also support the additional data requirements of the EU MDR for product submissions. When making such a significant investment, you should also anticipate how your requirements will evolve to remain competitive in the future. Technological advancements such as IoT, AR, and 3D printing create opportunities for very profitable new business models that can increase the quality of patient care considerably. Features such as predictive and remote service offer flexibility around downtime to minimize the impact on patient health. These technologies can help medical device companies advance their mission of making people’s lives better.Recommendations
Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:- Identify the top challenges your company needs to solve when bringing medical devices to market.
- Consider a solution that can support the entire lifecycle of your product, from patient needs and requirements to, design, test, manufacturing, and service.
- Look at solutions that will support the Case for Quality. A product centric approach and an integrated PLM and Quality Management System can help keep the focus on quality throughout the entire lifecycle and will also make it easier to comply with the EU MDR.
- Use a vendor who is familiar with medical device regulatory requirements and has the technology to reduce the manual effort required to comply with regulations.
- Ensure you can manage the device and all associated documents, design details, and changes while having traceability across everything.
- Support requirements with a solution that will work across all disciplines and has traceability across all stages and deliverables to support changes and compliance.
- Empower each team member including design, quality, procurement, manufacturing, and service with tools that work for them, while still ensuring a single source of truth for product information.
- Support quality management with traceability from requirements to test and reporting tools to ensure monitoring of trends that impact quality.
- Ensure tight controls on suppliers so as not to put compliance at risk.
- Select a solution that will support manufacturing so that you produce devices as designed and meet regulatory requirements.
- Think about medical device service requirements and use a solution that will support current and future service models such as predictive and remote service.
- Select a vendor who can integrate with your existing solutions while implementing new solutions where needed.
- Consider future needs for potential revenue streams and future needs for technologies such as IoT, 3D printing, and Augmented Reality.
How can the cloud help manufacturers improve product development to drive higher levels of profitability? Tech-Clarity surveyed over 300 companies about cloud product development to find out.
The Cloud Improves Product Development Speed and Collaboration
Researchers discovered that product development speed drives profitability, but that today’s status quo hampers time to market because product development resources waste too much time on non-value-added activities. On the other hand, companies that use the cloud for product development find it easier to collaborate, waste less time, and are less likely to report missing due dates due to product development challenges. Please enjoy the summary* below. Access the full eBook from our sponsor, Onshape (registration required).Table of Contents
- Profitability Demands Product Development Velocity
- Companies are Wasting too Much Development Time
- Wasted Time Leads to Costly Errors and Delays
- Increased Reliance on Others will Increase Wasted Time
- Benchmarking Product Development Performance
- The Cloud Enhances Product Development
- The Cloud Fuels Collaboration
- Cloud Benefits for Product Development
- Conclusions
- About the Research
- Acknowledgments
Profitability Demands Product Development Velocity
The Need for Speed Let’s start with the business in mind. Product development is critical to a profitable manufacturing company. Manufacturers must innovate quickly to respond to market and customer needs. Responding companies confirm this, with over one-half selecting product development speed as a driver of their business success and profitability over the next three years, making it the most prevalent factor.
Design Necessities
Cost, quality, and performance are also commonly reported drivers. Our product development research, however, consistently shows that these are market necessities and not necessarily differentiators. Our experience shows that most companies choose to delay product delivery to satisfy quality and performance goals, sacrificing due dates, market speed, and associated leadership opportunities.
Companies are Wasting too Much Development Time
Non-Valued-Added Activities Lose Precious Time
Although time is critical, product developers spend a significant amount of time waiting for others and working on non-value-added activities. Survey respondents report waiting for data, waiting for others to finish designs, and the ever-present challenge of finding the data they need to do their jobs. Beyond that, they report losing time attending non-productive meetings.
Technical Resources Waste One-Half of their Time
The amount of wasted time is significant. Respondents report that technical resources such as designers and engineers only spend about 47% of their time directly on product innovation, product development, and engineering. Manufacturers can’t afford this when time is so crucial to profitability. Just imagine the benefits of eliminating these challenges and the impact it would have on product development speed.
Conclusions
Key Findings
Companies need to move fast in product development in order to drive profitability, but currently waste too much time on non-value-added product development activities and suffer from delays. Many of the challenges that hamper product development speed relate to waiting for others. Unfortunately, reliance on others – both internally and externally - is both highly valuable and growing.
Top Performers, however, are more likely to use cloud systems for product development and are better able to collaborate and waste less time than Others. Both Top Performers and companies that use the cloud report much easier collaboration, both internally and more importantly externally. The bottom line is that companies that use the cloud waste less time and are less likely to miss due dates, driving the product development speed that leads to business success and company profitability.
*This summary is an abbreviated version of the research and does not contain the full content. A link to download the full report is available above.
If you have difficulty obtaining a copy of the report, please contact us using the "Contact" link below.
[post_title] => Accelerating Product Development with the Cloud (eBook)
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => open
[ping_status] => open
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => cloud-product-development
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:28:19
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:28:19
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://tech-clarity.com/?p=8723
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[8] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 8712
[post_author] => 2
[post_date] => 2020-04-14 10:12:42
[post_date_gmt] => 2020-04-14 14:12:42
[post_content] =>
How do your product innovation processes stack up against your competitors? Against top innovators? What practical steps can you take to improve it? Watch this webcast to understand how to benchmark your digital innovation maturity.
Benchmark Your Digital Innovation Maturity
This webcast shares definitions and details about the four pillars of digital innovation maturity:- Digital Twin
- Digital Thread
- Digital Manufacturing
- Digital Innovation Platform
Webcast Announcement
Leading manufacturers are embracing the digital thread to streamline product development and create digital continuity across the product lifecycle. The digital thread is a strategic initiative that provides significant, measurable benefits including, increased engineering efficiency, improved quality, faster time to market, enhanced innovation, and better compliance. The backbone of the digital thread is enterprise PLM. PLM is a key digital enabler according to a recent Tech-Clarity survey, finding that top performing companies are 73% more likely to use PLM to support the digital thread. Join our panel interview hosted by Jim Brown, President of Tech-Clarity and Jeff Zemsky, Senior Director of Product Management, PTC. The panel will share recent survey results on PLM and the digital thread and discuss how to select the right PLM solution to meet digital thread objectives. The webcast covers:- The strategic value of the digital thread
- How to create digital continuity across the product lifecycle
- Key requirements of a supporting solution
- Special considerations for Engineering, Manufacturing, Quality, Service, and IT
- Other requirements critical to achieving digital thread value' is supposed
*This summary is an abbreviated version of the research and does not contain the full content. A link to download the full infographic is available above.
If you have difficulty obtaining a copy of the report, please contact us using the "Contact" link below.
[post_title] => Avoid Wasting Design Time (infographic)
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => open
[ping_status] => open
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => wasting-design-time-infographic
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:26:09
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:26:09
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://tech-clarity.com/?p=8684
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[11] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 8674
[post_author] => 2
[post_date] => 2020-03-27 09:15:38
[post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-27 13:15:38
[post_content] =>
How can manufacturers improve their product innovation processes to outperform their competition? Jim Brown shares his perspective on digital transformation for innovation and invites manufacturers to take a free digital innovation assessment in his guest post on the Siemens Thought Leadership Blog.
Top Innovators have Digitally Transformed Innovation
Product innovation requires inspiration and a conducive culture to flourish. It is also heavily reliant on effective product design, development, and engineering practices. Turning an idea into a profitable product takes a coordinated effort supported by the right processes and tools. Our research shows that top innovators – those companies that outperform their competitors in revenue growth, profit margin expansion, and product portfolio freshness – have digitalized their product innovation process. These companies have embraced digitalization across four pillars:- Digital Twin
- Digital Thread
- Digital Manufacturing
- Digital Innovation Platform
Read More
Please click the synopsis below to read the full guest post on digital transformation for innovation including:- The four pillars of digital innovation
- How to understand your digital innovation maturity
- How to benchmark your maturity and get customized recommendations
- An invitation to take the assessment to benchmark your company
- Next steps
- Benefits of better IT/OT convergence, which are many and proven
- How current technologies can support this convergence at every stage of data:
- Gathering data effectively
- Putting IT and OT data into context
- Gaining consistent access
- Increasing visibility into performance
- Practical questions to ask to explore your next steps toward IT/OT convergence
TABLE OF CONTENTS*
- Opportunities for Better Plastic Parts
- How Do You Stay Competitive
- Common Design Challenges
- The Impact of Manufacturing Defects
- Where to Focus to Improve Part and Mold Design
- The Needs of Part and Mold Designers
- Conclusions
- Recommendations
- About the Research
- Acknowledgements
Opportunities for Better Plastic Parts
Lower the Cost of Quality
What’s the cost of poor-quality plastic parts? Tech-Clarity research finds that part quality is critical to product success, yet manufacturing defects in plastic parts is one of the top issues that negatively impacts product competitiveness. Unfortunately, it is hard to avoid manufacturing defects as 96% of surveyed manufacturers report finding them during mold trials. The cost is quite high as manufacturers find
that correcting these defects during the mold trial adds 26% to the total cost of the mold. Imagine if you could lower some of that cost by making better decisions during design to avoid those issues before the mold trial?
This research study, based on a survey of 265 manufacturers, examines common challenges with plastic part and mold design, their impacts, and how to overcome them. The research reveals five best practices to help you ensure your plastic parts will be produced as designed.
How Do You Stay Competitive?
Getting Ahead
What's most important to winning your customer’s business? It doesn't matter if you are designing plastic parts or the mold; companies indicate quality, cost, and reliability are most important (see lower graph). Unfortunately, if you don't meet these objectives, not only will you fail to win new business, but the final product will be less competitive.
What Hurts Competitiveness?
If you can't produce plastic parts as designed, the entire product will be less successful. Companies rate manufacturing defects as the top issue to negatively impact competitiveness. Defects can range from cosmetic problems such as flow lines or burn marks to more severe issues that hurt the structural integrity. These problems ultimately gives customers the impression that the product suffers from poor quality.
Other resulting issues include market delays and excess cost. Problems found during the mold trial will contribute to both of these issues as the troubleshooting, reworking of the mold, or part design changes consume both time and budget. During that time, a competitor may beat you to market, or you may have a reduced window of opportunity to collect revenue. Excess costs either cut into profitability or dictate a less competitive price.
Improve Design
These problems reflect poorly on the entire product. Even an exceptional design will not realize its full market potential if the plastic parts give the impression the product is inferior. It’s critical to properly design plastic parts and ensure the mold produces them as designed.
Recommendations
Recommendations and Next Steps Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:- Facilitate collaboration between part and mold designers. Mold designers can provide insight to optimize the part design for injection molding, and part designers can clarify part requirements for the mold designer.
- Use technology to supplement experience. Modern software tools contain many automated features that will guide designers.
- Support design for manufacturability with injection molding simulation. Injection molding simulation will catch many manufacturing defects during design so that you can correct them early on, reducing the number of problems found during the mold trial.
- Use injection molding simulation early and regularly. The earlier you use injection molding simulation during part design, the more you can optimize the part for injection molding, so there is less risk of manufacturing defects, and the mold design can optimize cycle time.
- Integrate injection molding simulation and design. An integrated solution streamlines the process of preparing the design model for analysis, reducing a barrier to simulation.
- How BID Group developed a solid digital transformation strategy for service verse building an in-house solution
- The importance of listening to customers and how to best incorporate those insights into a solution to guarantee added value
- The value of their production health module and how this improves customer satisfaction
- The unique benefits that are passed on to customers to improve mill efficiency and profitability
Table of Contents
- Choosing the Right PLM
- Introducing the Buyer’s Guide
- The Digital Thread Imperative
- What to Look for to Streamline Engineering
- What to Look for to Create Digital Continuity
- Digital Thread Business Value
- Considerations by Role – Engineering
- Considerations by Role – Manufacturing
- Considerations by Role – Quality
- Considerations by Role – IT
- Considerations by Role – Service
- PLM is the Digital Thread Backbone
- Special Considerations – Emerging Technologies
- Special Considerations – Industry Requirements
- Implementation Considerations
- Vendor Considerations
- Conclusions and Next Steps
- About the Research
- Acknowledgments
Introducing the PLM for Digital Thread Buyer's Guide
Digital Thread and PLM Survey Highlights A recent survey of over 250 manufacturers and engineering firms highlights the strategic value of the digital thread and the vital role that PLM plays to achieving their objectives. In fact, over three-quarters of manufacturers view the digital thread as either important or critical to achieving their business strategy. Structure of this Guide This buyer’s guide analyzes the strategic value of the digital thread and then shares the things companies should consider when choosing a supporting solution. The guide shares functional requirements needed to streamline engineering and create digital continuity across the product lifecycle. It also shares some critical things to look for by key roles in the manufacturing enterprise. The guide then goes beyond functional considerations to identify special considerations, vendor requirements, and important factors to ensure successful implantation and adoption.
The Digital Thread Imperative
Business Strategies Demand a Cohesive Digital Thread Over three-quarters of companies say that the digital thread is either important or critical to achieving their business strategy. Surveyed companies report a variety of important goals for their digital thread initiative (see chart). The range of goals highlights the many potential digital thread benefits. While definitions vary, there are two primary values of the digital thread; streamlined engineering and digital continuity.
Streamlined Engineering
The digital thread streamlines design by allowing product development teams to share and reuse design data across the stages of innovation. Design continuity along the digital thread allows designers to add their design information to a cohesive design model, directly incorporating and extending design data from prior steps.
Digital Continuity
The digital thread ties product information, decisions, and history together in a structured, integrated way that captures product innovation and knowledge throughout the product lifecycle. It establishes traceability from early in the front end of innovation through development, manufacturing, service, and field operation.
Conclusions and Next Steps
Invest in the Digital Thread
Invest in the digital thread to streamline engineering and create digital continuity. Top Performers are 2.6 times as likely to view the digital thread as critical to supporting their business strategy.
Extend the Thread across the Lifecycle
Adopt a comprehensive scope that incorporates cross-departmental data. Top Performers are more likely to include manufacturing, quality, and service plans in the scope of their digital thread, and enrich it with actual data from the IoT.
Leverage PLM as the Digital Manufacturing Backbone
Adopt PLM to support the digital thread. Top Performing companies are 2.4 times as likely to view PLM as critical to supporting the digital thread and are much more likely to use PLM to support the digital thread.
Enjoy the Benefits
The digital thread provides significant, measurable benefits including, increased engineering efficiency, improved quality, faster time to market, enhanced innovation, and better compliance. Top Performers gain even higher benefits than others. For example, these more successful product developers enable their technical resources to spend 27% more time, on average, on value-added activities than their poorer performing counterparts.
*This summary is an abbreviated version of the research and does not contain the full content. A link to download the full report is available above.
If you have difficulty obtaining a copy of the report, please contact us using the "Contact" link below.
[post_title] => Choosing PLM for Digital Thread Initiatives (buyer's guide)
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => open
[ping_status] => open
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => plm-for-digital-thread
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-11-14 22:28:01
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 03:28:01
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://tech-clarity.com/?p=8609
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
[16] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 8595
[post_author] => 2
[post_date] => 2020-03-05 16:01:43
[post_date_gmt] => 2020-03-05 21:01:43
[post_content] =>
What should manufacturers look for in a solution to digitalize and transform service through IoT remote monitoring? What can they do to change the relationship they have with their products and customers to increase business value for themselves and those using their products?
Join this interactive webcast, How to Select the Right Digital Transformation Solution, to hear Tech-Clarity's Jim Brown and PTC's Jon Kadane discuss IoT remote monitoring goals, value, and adoption requirements. Jim will discuss perspectives from his recent Service Transformation by Monitoring Customer Equipment eBook and Jon will share related experience working with customers.
Register for the PTC sponsored webcast replay now (registration required).
Synopsis
Julie Fraser here, and if you came in through Iyno Advisors, let me explain why I’m so excited to be part of Tech-Clarity now.
- Focus on making the business value of technology clear
- Greater visibility in the market and more activity on the website
- Better capabilities to conduct original research
- Broader focus on the full lifecycle of manufacturing enterprise software needs from concept, engineering and planning through manufacturing and service
- Video and other multi-media approaches as well as papers and webcasts
- An amazing team with deep expertise and values I share
Is your company prepared to respond to the critical business issues facing the high-tech industry? What key issues must your business prepare for in this fast paced high-tech market?
Tech-Clarity’s Solving High-Tech’s Top Six Critical Business Issues eBook identifies the top six critical business issues that high-tech companies should address. This will help them respond to market disruption and to stay relevant. As new technologies such as 5G, artificial intelligence, machine learning, quantum computing, and others create opportunities for innovation, there is even more pressure on development teams. The pace of innovation is so fast, high-tech development teams cannot afford to be hindered by process bottlenecks.. This eBook provides recommendations and guidance to enable greater agility to help high-tech companies stay competitive.
Please enjoy the summary* below. For the full report, please visit our sponsor SOLIDWORKS (registration required).
TABLE OF CONTENTS*
- Opportunities and Threats for High-Tech Companies
- The Speed of Innovation in High-Tech
- High-Tech Business Drivers
- Product Challenges Facing High-Tech
- How to Address the 6 Business Issues
- 1. Take Cost Out
- 2. Avoid Quality Problems
- 3. Enable Higher Productivity and Operational Agility
- 4. Facilitate Innovation
- 5. Ensure Performance and Reliability
- 6. Comply with Environmental and Regulatory Requirements
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgement
The Speed of Innovation in High-Tech
Technology Is Disruptive
Imagine all the ways technology has impacted our lives. It can be mind-boggling. Just think, how many high-tech products do you rely on every day that didn’t even exist not so long ago? Can you imagine life without the internet, smart phones, or a GPS? Not only are those relatively newer technologies commonplace, they’ve led to numerous other high-tech businesses, many of which have been disruptive.
It Is Hard to Stay Relevant
It is hard to believe today’s high school students don’t remember a world without the iPhone or have no concept of waiting to develop film after a family vacation. At the same time, some of today’s hottest products will eventually meet the same fate as the Walkman and VHS player, products we could not live without in the 80s, but are completely irrelevant today. In the high-tech industry, if you are unable to rapidly respond to today’s critical business issues, you risk becoming tomorrow’s Palm, the first company to produce personal digital assistants (PDAs), but it did too little, too late to maintain its market share. Interestingly, a study conducted by Innosight projects that nearly 50% of the current S&P 500 will be replaced over the next decade. Consequently, high-tech companies should take the right steps now to avoid that fate.
Implement Solutions for Today’s Critical Business Issues
The number of companies expected to fail highlights that too many companies rely on their current success. They avoid putting solutions in place for today’s critical business issues. Unfortunately, old approaches that helped you get by in the past, may no longer be enough. The significant competitive pressure leaves little room for missteps, so it is critical that you address these important issues to position your company to win.
Product Challenges Facing High-Tech
The Unique Challenges for High-Tech To address these business issues, there are several challenges high-tech companies must consider to succeed. The difficulties arise from unique design trends in the high-tech industry. Miniaturization One key design trend is miniaturization. While electronics get smaller and smaller, more innovative features and function must be packed into those tiny packages. Miniaturization leads to greater complexity and very dense packaging. The situation is only going to get harder as Tech-Clarity research3 finds that 56% of high-tech companies continue to feel pressure to incorporate even more software and electronics into their products over the next five years. Increased density brings with it more challenges as engineers have to manage heat. With heat being a leading cause of electronics failure, cooling solutions become a critical design requirement. Smarter and More Connected Products
Another key trend is that products are becoming smarter and more connected. Product intelligence requires more engineering disciplines, making collaboration across the team critical, especially to overcome the inherent silos within engineering disciplines.
Ignoring this trend is not an option as 50% of high-tech companies report they will lose market share if they don't make their products smarter, and 50% also say they will lose revenue. Further, high-tech companies also feel pressure to make products connected. As can be seen in the graph, 57% of high-tech companies say it is a competitive response which means it is a trend they can not ignore because their competitors are already looking at connectivity. However, while connectivity will make them more competitive, it adds to the complexity and extends the need for excellent collaboration
Conclusions
It is a very exciting time for the high-tech industry. Companies have lots of opportunities to innovate with options such as smart and connected products. At the same time, the market moves at a rapid pace. Plus design trends such as miniaturization create unique challenges for high-tech companies. By supporting excellent collaboration with an integrated ECAD/MCAD design environment, companies can overcome many challenges. To address the top critical business issues facing the industry, high-tech companies should focus on the following:- Take cost out
- Avoid quality problems
- Enable Higher Productivity and Operational Agility
- Facilitate Innovation
- Ensure Performance and Reliability
- Comply with Environmental and Regulatory Requirements
Tech-Clarity is pleased to announce that we are expanding our research team and extending our coverage to manufacturing operations software! Industry veteran and long-time research analyst Julie Fraser joins Tech-Clarity as Vice President of Research, Manufacturing Software. Julie brings with her a wealth of depth in manufacturing, scheduling, quality, maintenance, and smart manufacturing. Please visit Julie's bio page for more on her background.
As a team, we look forward to expanding and deepening our coverage of software across the manufacturing lifecycle. New technologies are emerging and existing technologies are converging, allowing manufacturers to digitally transform their business. Leading manufacturers are eliminating the gaps between product innovation, product development, engineering, manufacturing, and service. Today's leading software vendors are expanding their product portfolios to support this trend, developing comprehensive solution portfolios across the product lifecycle. Product Innovation Platforms offering CAD, CAE, PDM, and PLM are aligning and integrating much more closely with manufacturing operations solutions including MES / MOM, QMS, and more. "This is a strategic move," explains Jim Brown, President and Founder of Tech-Clarity. "As manufacturers integrate engineering and manufacturing operations, it's important for us to cover a broader perspective of the manufacturing and engineering systems landscape. Julie brings great experience and credibility, we are excited to have such a proven analyst join our team to help continue our mission of making the value of technology clear.”
Julie’s research focus will include smart manufacturing, Industry 4.0, manufacturing, quality, maintenance, scheduling, and related technologies. Please follow Julie on Twitter and join our mailing list to read Julie’s research.
For more information or to schedule a briefing please feel free to contact us.
[post_title] => Tech-Clarity adds Manufacturing Software Analyst Julie Fraser
[post_excerpt] =>
[post_status] => publish
[comment_status] => open
[ping_status] => open
[post_password] =>
[post_name] => fraser-joins
[to_ping] =>
[pinged] =>
[post_modified] => 2022-11-15 09:57:33
[post_modified_gmt] => 2022-11-15 14:57:33
[post_content_filtered] =>
[post_parent] => 0
[guid] => https://tech-clarity.com/?p=8548
[menu_order] => 0
[post_type] => post
[post_mime_type] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[filter] => raw
)
)
[post_count] => 20
[current_post] => -1
[before_loop] => 1
[in_the_loop] =>
[post] => WP_Post Object
(
[ID] => 8848
[post_author] => 2572
[post_date] => 2020-05-05 11:30:06
[post_date_gmt] => 2020-05-05 15:30:06
[post_content] =>
What software tools do engineers need to support product design? Which capabilities will help engineers develop products that are higher quality, more personalized, more innovative, and lower in ownership cost?
These are challenging tasks to achieve that are further complicated due to increasing product complexity, engineering changes, and multiple engineering disciplines. However, with the correct software solution, the challenges can be surmounted during product design. Tech-Clarity's Buyer's Guide for Engineers: How to Select Essential Tools for Product Design can do just that by providing guidance to help you choose the right solution for your company.
This guide is a starting point for tackling those challenges. It provides a high-level overview of requirements for a complete, integrated product design suite. Tech-Clarity’s buyer’s guides look beyond software requirements to the other elements that help companies get value from their solutions. Consequently, it includes criteria for implementation, adoption, service, and vendor selection. Further, each section contains a checklist to support your software evaluation efforts.
Please enjoy the summary* below. For the full eBook, please visit our sponsor Siemens (registration required).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Executive Overview
- The Business Value of Investing in Engineering
- Support End-to-End Processes with an Integrated Solution
- Mechanical Design
- Electrical and Electronic Design
- Simulation
- Manufacturing
- Technical Publications
- Design Data Management
- Service Requirements
- Vendor Requirements
- Identify Unique Company Needs
- Conclusion
- Recommendations
- About the Author
- Acknowledgments
Executive Overview
Global competition, including low-cost providers, makes it hard to compete in today’s market. It is impossible to compete on price when competitors come from geographic regions with low employment costs. Consequently, companies must compete in other ways, such as with better, high quality products, more personalization, improved services, greater innovation, or lower cost of ownership. Achieving this requires improving efficiency, catching problems sooner, and making better decisions to lower product development costs and increase product quality. Consequently, teams must be agile enough to quickly respond to market shifts and customer demands. Products have to get to market as fast as possible to maximize the window of opportunity before low-cost providers can undercut prices with competing offerings.The Value of Digitalization
Efficiencies achieved through digitalization accelerate the development process and improve quality by creating a digital thread across the entire product development cycle. As a result, all information stays up to date, changes are propagated, and there is less risk of errors. However, it can be hard to know where to start, especially for a small or mid-size company. Smaller companies share many of the same challenges as larger companies, but lack the budget of a big OEM. The right software solution can help, but it must have the right capabilities, at an affordable price that will be manageable for a small company.Selecting the Right Solution
With so much to consider, how do you choose the right software solution to support your product life-cycle? This buyer’s guide serves as a guide to help you pick the right solution for your company. This guide covers requirements for a complete integrated product development suite. It has four major sections covering software functionality, service requirements, vendor attributes, and unique company considerations (Figure 1). Each section includes a checklist of key requirements to investigate when selecting software tools. This guide is not an all-encompassing requirements list. It provides a high-level overview.
While the amount of embedded software in today’s products is growing, for the purposes of this guide, it was not considered part of the scope.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on industry experience and research for this report, Tech-Clarity offers the following recommendations:
- Create a digital thread across your development process with an end-to-end integrated product development suite
- Consider solutions that support mechanical design, electrical design, simulation, manufacturing, technical publications, and design data management.
- Ensure you have traceability across the entire lifecycle of your product
- Do not compromise on ease of use
- Support collaboration across the development lifecycle
- Work off a single high-fidelity model to support your digitalization strategy and create a single source of truth
- Ensure your solution will have the support behind it to make it a success at your company.
- Select a vendor who will be a good partner.
All Results for "All"
Avoid 5 CAD Design Time Wasters (eBook)
How can companies improve data management to avoid the five most common CAD design time wasters and win the engineering productivity challenge? Improving design data management maturity, enabled by PDM and PLM solutions, helps reduce non-value-added time and increase engineering productivity. Please enjoy the summary* below. Please visit our sponsor Siemens for the full research (registration…
Breaking the Mold: How Toolmakers Are Transforming Operations
What does it take for toolmakers to be competitive? What can mold makers do to improve their business? Tech-Clarity’s eBook, Breaking the Mold: How Toolmakers Are Transforming Operations to Stay Competitive explores these questions. The business of mold making is tough. Firstly, there is the time consuming bidding process where you need to provide an accurate,…
Empower Engineers with Cutting-Edge Design Tools
Do your design tools hold product development back? With the pressures of global competition, and the never-ending struggle of bringing innovative, cost-effective products to market efficiently, a smooth product design process is paramount. Unfortunately, the vast majority of companies, 99%, report they experience design bottlenecks that hold them back, which consequently hurts their success and…
Faster Product Development on the Cloud (webcast)
How can companies achieve faster product development and higher profitability using the cloud? Join Jim Brown on an exciting webcast as he shares four key takeaways from his recent survey of over 300 companies. Jim will be joined by an Onshape founder who will share how Onshape customers take advantage of the cloud to improve…
How-To Guide: Avoid Non-Value Added Work for Engineers
How can a company better utilize engineers’ time? Today’s market is hyper competitive; it is hard to stand out. To be successful, companies must empower their engineering teams to focus on product innovation, quality, performance and cost. Balancing those key criteria is challenging enough, but made even more challenging as engineers report they waste a…
Medical Device Manufacturers’ Software Selection Guide
What should you think about when selecting a software solution to support the development of medical devices while considering the Case for Quality and the EU MDR? Tech-Clarity’s Medical Device Manufacturers’ Software Selection Guide helps manufacturers identify the right buying criteria for software solutions to support developing, producing, and servicing medical devices. The guide also…
Accelerating Product Development with the Cloud (eBook)
How can the cloud help manufacturers improve product development to drive higher levels of profitability? Tech-Clarity surveyed over 300 companies about cloud product development to find out. The Cloud Improves Product Development Speed and Collaboration Researchers discovered that product development speed drives profitability, but that today’s status quo hampers time to market because product development…
Benchmark Your Innovation Processes and Systems (webcast)
How do your product innovation processes stack up against your competitors? Against top innovators? What practical steps can you take to improve it? Watch this webcast to understand how to benchmark your digital innovation maturity. Benchmark Your Digital Innovation Maturity This webcast shares definitions and details about the four pillars of digital innovation maturity: Digital…
Selecting PLM for the Digital Thread (webcast)
Why are manufacturers pursuing the digital thread? What is the right PLM system to support a digital thread initiative? Jim Brown joins PTC‘s Jeff Zemsky to share results from Tech-Clarity’s recent survey on PLM and the Digital Thread. Jim and Jeff discuss the goals and benefits of the digital thread, followed by requirements to ensure…
Avoid Wasting Design Time (infographic)
How can engineers avoid wasting precious design time on non-value-added data management tasks? Take a look at our new infographic Avoiding Time Wasters in CAD Design to see a graphical representation of our research. The “CAD Design Challenge” turns design into a board game that highlights key time wasters in design and the best practices…
Digital Transformation for Innovation (guest post)
How can manufacturers improve their product innovation processes to outperform their competition? Jim Brown shares his perspective on digital transformation for innovation and invites manufacturers to take a free digital innovation assessment in his guest post on the Siemens Thought Leadership Blog. Top Innovators have Digitally Transformed Innovation Product innovation requires inspiration and a conducive…
Practical Approaches to IT/OT Convergence (guest post)
How can plants leverage all of their data more effectively? One foundation is for IT and OT to converge. But that does not have to be far in the future. My guest blog Practical Approaches to IT/OT Convergence discusses why and how to tear down the wall between manufacturing engineering and their operational technology (OT)…
Designing and Molding Better Plastic Parts
What’s the cost of poor-quality plastic parts? How can you avoid that cost? Findings from Tech-Clarity’s eBook, How-to Guide for Designing and Molding Better Plastic Parts reveal that 96% of surveyed manufacturers report finding manufacturing defects during mold trials. Highlighting why that’s so painful, manufacturers report that correcting these defects during the mold trial adds…
Digital Transformation at BID Group using IoT (webcast)
How has one of the largest integrated suppliers to the wood processing industry used the IoT to digitally transform their business and deliver new revenue? Learn how BID Group has improved throughput and performance for their customers by remotely monitoring their equipment through the IoT. Join this interactive IndustryWeek webcast, How BID Group Delivers New…
Choosing PLM for Digital Thread Initiatives (buyer’s guide)
How can PLM enable manufacturers to streamline engineering and create digital continuity with a cohesive digital thread? What should they look for in a PLM system to support their digital thread initiative? Our new eBook, Choosing the Right Enterprise PLM to Support the Digital Thread, shares survey results analyzing the value of the digital thread…
Selecting a Solution for IoT Remote Monitoring (webcast)
What should manufacturers look for in a solution to digitalize and transform service through IoT remote monitoring? What can they do to change the relationship they have with their products and customers to increase business value for themselves and those using their products? Join this interactive webcast, How to Select the Right Digital Transformation Solution,…
Welcome to Tech-Clarity from Julie Fraser
Julie Fraser here, and if you came in through Iyno Advisors, let me explain why I’m so excited to be part of Tech-Clarity now. Focus on making the business value of technology clear Greater visibility in the market and more activity on the website Better capabilities to conduct original research Broader focus on the full…
Solving High-Tech’s Top 6 Critical Business Issues
Is your company prepared to respond to the critical business issues facing the high-tech industry? What key issues must your business prepare for in this fast paced high-tech market? Tech-Clarity’s Solving High-Tech’s Top Six Critical Business Issues eBook identifies the top six critical business issues that high-tech companies should address. This will help them respond…
Tech-Clarity adds Manufacturing Software Analyst Julie Fraser
Tech-Clarity is pleased to announce that we are expanding our research team and extending our coverage to manufacturing operations software! Industry veteran and long-time research analyst Julie Fraser joins Tech-Clarity as Vice President of Research, Manufacturing Software. Julie brings with her a wealth of depth in manufacturing, scheduling, quality, maintenance, and smart manufacturing. Please visit…












